Report
dewberry-group-v-dewberry-engineers-pet
109 authorities checked
How this report was built
AI inference calls
0
Citations parsed
109
Sources queried
2
Cornell LII, CourtListener
Source texts retrieved
90
Quotes checked
187
145 matched in source text
Verification runs deterministically against authoritative public databases. Your brief is not sent to OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or any other third-party model.
Click any citation below to see how we verified it, the matched source, and a per-quote breakdown.
§Authorities
|
1 Agency for International Development v. Alliance for Open Society International, Inc., 591 U.S. 430 (2020) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 3 of 3 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Agency for Int'l Development v. Alliance for Open Society”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“foreign affiliates”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“possess[ed] no rights under the First Amendment”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“the corporate veil”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
2 Ambler v. Whipple, 87 U.S. (20 Wall.) 546 (1874) flagged
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
0 of 1 located
Why we flagged this
- At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Ambler v. Whipple”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“in trust for the benefit”
Not found in the cited opinion. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.
3 American Rice, Inc. v. Producers Rice Mill, Inc., 518 F.3d 321 (5th Cir. 2008) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “American Rice, Inc. v. Producers Rice Mill, Inc”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
4 AMG Capital Management, LLC v. FTC, 593 U.S. 67 (2021) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “AMG Capital Management, LLC v. FTC”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
5 Amusement Corp. of America v. Mattson, 138 F.2d 693 (5th Cir. 1943) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Amusement Corp. v. Mattson”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
6 Anderson v. Abbott, 321 U.S. 349 (1944) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 2 of 2 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Anderson v. Abbott”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“Limited liability is the rule not the exception,”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“and on that assumption large undertakings are rested, vast enterprises are launched, and huge sums of capital attracted.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
7 Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Solimino, 501 U.S. 104 (1991) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Solimino”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“take[s]it as given that Congress has legislated with an expectation that the principle will apply.”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
8 B&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Industries, Inc., 575 U.S. 138 (2015) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 2 of 2 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “B&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Industries, Inc”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“federal law does not create trademarks,”
Found word-for-word in the opinion. Brief signaled: “(citation omitted)”.
“'important legal rights and benefits'”
Found word-for-word in the opinion. Brief signaled: “(citation omitted)”.
9 Bank of United States v. Deveaux, 9 U.S. (5 Cranch) 61 (1809) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Bank of the United States v. Deveaux”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
10 Page(s) Bartenwerfer v. Buckley, 598 U.S. 69 (2023) flagged
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
1 of 2 located
Why we flagged this
- At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Bartenwerfer v. Buckley”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“No statute pursues a single policy at all costs,”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“are not free to rewrite [a]statute *** as if it did.”
Not found in the cited opinion. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.
11 Bittner v. United States, 598 U.S. 85 (2023) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Bittner v. United States”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
12 Brady v. Daly, 175 U.S. 148 (1899) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Brady v. Daly”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“many cases [in which] it would be quite difficult to prove the exact amount of damages.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
13 Brown v. Swann, 35 U.S. (10 Pet.) 497 (1836) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Brown v. Swann”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“not assist to enforce at all.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
14 Burnet v. Clark, 287 U.S. 410 (1932) flagged
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
1 of 2 located
Why we flagged this
- At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Burnet v. Clark”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“defendant's profits,”
Not found in the cited opinion. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.
“in no sense c[ould] the corporation be regarded as his alter ego, or agent”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
15 Cedric Kushner Promotions, Ltd. v. King, 533 U.S. 158 (2001) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Cedric Kushner Promotions, Ltd. v. King”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
16 Comcast Corp. v. National Ass'n of African American-Owned Media, 589 U.S. 327 (2020) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Comcast Corp. v. National Assn. of African-American Owned Media”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“the backdrop of the common law.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
17 Coupe v. Royer, 155 U.S. 565 (1895) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Coupe v. Royer”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“actually received by the defendant.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
18 Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 539 U.S. 23 (2003) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“in accordance with [its] common-law foundations.”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
19 Dole Food Co. v. Patrickson, 538 U.S. 468 (2003) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 4 of 4 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Dole Food Co. v. Patrickson”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“rare exception”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“the general rules regarding corporate formalities”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“[t]he properties of two corporations are distinct,”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“the same shareholders own or control both.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
20 Edmondson v. Velvet Lifestyles, LLC, 43 F.4th 1153 (11th Cir. 2022) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Jaime Faith Edmondson v. Velvet Lifestyles, LLC”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
21 Page(s) Egbert v. Boule, 596 U.S. 482 (2022) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Egbert v. Boule”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
22 Elizabeth v. Pavement Co., 97 U.S. 126 (1878) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 4 of 4 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Elizabeth v. Pavement Co”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“has realized no profit from the use of the invention”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“cannot be called upon to respond for profits”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“the contractors and not the city realized”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“made no profit at all,”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
23 Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Navarro, 584 U.S. 79 (2018) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Navarro”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
24 First National City v. Cuba, 462 U.S. 611 (1983) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “First National City Bank v. Banco Para El Comercio Exterior De Cuba”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
25 Fischer v. United States, 144 S. Ct. 2176 (2024) brief quality flagged
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 3 of 3 located
Brief-quality observations
- A case named 'Joseph W. Fischer, Petitioner v. United States' exists in CourtListener at [{'volume': '603', 'reporter': 'U.S.', 'page': '480'}] (scotus, 2024), but the brief's citation does not match.
How we matched this
The brief's reporter triple is independently confirmed by leagle.com's volume index, and CourtListener's docket index identifies the same case.
Quotes attributed to this authority
“text in context,”
Found word-for-word in the opinion. Brief signaled: “(citation omitted)”.
“particularized legislation”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“is the superior one.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
26 Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co., 386 U.S. 714 (1967) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 5 of 5 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“meticulously detailed the remedies available to a plaintiff who proves that his valid trademark has been infringed.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“compensatory recovery measured by the profits that accrued to the defendant by virtue of his infringement.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“the 'circumstances of the case.'”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“prescribe[s]intricate remedies,”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
“the general equity power 'to do equity in a particular situation'”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
27 Getty Petroleum Corp. v. Bartco Petroleum Corp., 858 F.2d 103 (2d Cir. 1988) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Getty Petroleum Corp. v. Bartco Petroleum Corp”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
28 Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Co. v. Knudson, 534 U.S. 204 (2002) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 3 of 3 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance v. Knudson”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“the limitations upon [their] availability that equity typically imposes.”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
“contain[s] the limitations upon [the remedy's] availability that equity typically imposes.”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
“[V]ague notions of a statute's 'basic purpose'”
Found word-for-word in the opinion. Brief signaled: “(citation omitted)”.
29 Grupo Mexicano de Desarrollo S.A. v. Alliance Bond Fund, Inc., 527 U.S. 308 (1999) flagged
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
7 of 10 located
Why we flagged this
- At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Grupo Mexicano De Desarrollo, S. A. v. Alliance Bond Fund, Inc”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“the power to create remedies previously unknown to equity jurisprudence.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“equity follows the law.”
Not found in the cited opinion. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.
“has no power to change or unsettle”
This quote does not appear in the cited opinion's text, but may be a canonical restatement of the opinion — the language appears in another opinion this brief cites.
“Wherever the rights of the parties are clearly governed by rules of law, courts of equity will follow such legal rules.”
Not found in the cited opinion. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.
“contradict or overturn the grounds or principles thereof”
Not found in the cited opinion. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.
“abate the rigor of the common law.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“flexibility is confined within the broad boundaries of traditional equitable relief.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“a type of relief that has never been available before,”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“by longstanding judicial precedent,”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“not of flexibility but of omnipotence.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
30 Gustafson v. Alloyd Co., 513 U.S. 561 (1995) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 2 of 2 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Gustafson v. Alloyd Co”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“'rule of statutory construction' that 'identical words used in different parts of the same act'”
Found word-for-word in the opinion. Brief signaled: “(citation omitted)”.
“'are intended to have the same meaning.'”
Found word-for-word in the opinion. Brief signaled: “(citation omitted)”.
31 Page(s) Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc., 579 U.S. 93 (2016) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 2 of 2 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“narro[w]”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“channel[s]of discretion”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
32 Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Brothers & Co., 240 U.S. 251 (1916) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Brothers & Co”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
33 Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L.P., 144 S. Ct. 2071 (2024) brief quality flagged
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
Brief-quality observations
- A case named 'William K. Harrington, United States Trustee, Region 2, Petitioner v. Purdue Pharma L.P., et al.' exists in CourtListener at [{'volume': '603', 'reporter': 'U.S.', 'page': '204'}] (scotus, 2024), but the brief's citation does not match.
How we matched this
The brief's reporter triple is independently confirmed by leagle.com's volume index, and CourtListener's docket index identifies the same case.
34 Hedges v. Dixon County, 150 U.S. 182 (1893) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Hedges v. Dixon County”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“rights or the situation of parties [that] are clearly defined and established by law.”
Found — minor punctuation or spacing differences. Brief signaled: “(citation omitted)”.
35 Holmberg v. Armbrecht, 327 U.S. 392 (1946) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Holmberg v. Armbrecht”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“expect [courts] to break with historic principles of equity.”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
36 Honeycutt v. United States, 581 U.S. 443 (2017) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Honeycutt v. United States”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“never obtained tainted property as a result of the crime.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
37 INS v. Pangilinan, 486 U.S. 875 (1988) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Pangilinan”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“create a remedy in violation of law,”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
38 Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc., 456 U.S. 844 (1982) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“induce[d]”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
39 Jennings v. Carson, 8 U.S. (4 Cranch) 2 (1807) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Jennings v. Carson”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“were not in possession of the thing to be restored, had no power over it, and were, consequently, unable to redeliver it.”
Found — the brief joined separate passages from the opinion.
40 Keystone Manufacturing Co. v. Adams, 151 U.S. 139 (1894) flagged
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
1 of 2 located
Why we flagged this
- At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Keystone Manufacturing Co. v. Adams”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“what certain third companies were alleged to have made”
The brief's quote matches 76% of the cited opinion, but in separate passages — not as one continuous quote. This typically means the brief either paraphrased inside the quotation marks (Bluebook Rule 5.2 requires brackets for any substitution) or silently omitted intervening text (Bluebook Rule 5.3 requires “. . .” for omissions). Compare the brief's quotation against the cited opinion.
What diverges
brief: …what certain third companies were alleged t…
opinion: … what cértainthird companies were alleged t…
“not the defendant's profits, but those realized by other companies.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
41 Page(s) Leman v. Krentler-Arnold Hinge Last Co., 284 U.S. 448 (1932) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Leman v. Krentler-Arnold Hinge Last Co”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“'compensation for the injury the [holder] has sustained'”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
42 Liu v. SEC, 591 U.S. 71 (2020) flagged
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
9 of 12 located
Why we flagged this
- At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Liu v. SEC. & Exch. Comm'n”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“against multiple wrongdoers under a joint-and-several liability theory”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“that accrue[d]to his affiliates *** could transform any equitable profitsfocused remedy into a penalty.”
Not found in the cited opinion. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.
“the net profits from wrongdoing, that is, 'the gain made upon any business or investment, when both the receipts and payments are taken into the account.'”
Found word-for-word in the opinion. Brief signaled: “(citation omitted)”.
“generally awarded profitsbased remedies against individuals”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“not against multiple wrongdoers under a joint-and-several liability theory.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“that accrue[d]to his affiliates”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
“transform any equitable profits-focused remedy into a penalty.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“which have accrued to another”
Found word-for-word in the opinion. Brief signaled: “(citation omitted)”.
“benefits that accrue to [its] affiliates.”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
“to capture the infringer's 'true profits,'”
Not found in the cited opinion. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.
“'nonarms' length' * ** affiliates.”
Not found in the cited opinion. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.
“any equitable relief”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
43 , 40, 44, 45, 47, 50 Livingston v. Tompkins, 4 Johns. Ch. 415 (N.Y. 1820) flagged
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
0 of 2 located
Why we flagged this
- At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Livingston v. Tompkins”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“more properly the business of a Court of Equity to relieve against a penalty than to assist the recovery of it.”
Not found in the cited opinion. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.
“in the nature of a penalty,”
Not found in the cited opinion. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.
44 Livingston v. Woodworth, 56 U.S. (15 How.) 546 (1854) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Livingston v. Woodworth”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
45 Marshall v. Vicksburg, 82 U.S. (15 Wall.) 146 (1873) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Marshall v. Vicksburg”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“len[d]its aid to enforce a forfeiture or penalty.”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
46 Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp., 546 U.S. 132 (2005) flagged
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
1 of 2 located
Why we flagged this
- At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“[u]nlimited”
Not found in the cited opinion. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.
“motion to a court's discretion is a motion, not to its inclination, but to its judgment; and its judgment is to be guided by sound legal principles.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion. Brief signaled: “(brackets omitted)”.
47 Max Rack, Inc. v. Core Health & Fitness, LLC, 40 F.4th 454 (6th Cir. 2022) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Max Rack, Inc. v. Core Health & Fitness, LLC”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“the defendant engage[s]in discovery 'stonewalling' that prevent[s]the plaintiff from identifying its total infringing sales.”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible. Brief signaled: “(citation omitted)”.
48 MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. AT&T Co., 512 U.S. 218 (1994) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 2 of 2 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“might be good English”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“but only because there is a figure of speech called understatement and a literary device known as sarcasm.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
49 McLean v. Fleming, 96 U.S. 245 (1878) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “McLean v. Fleming”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
50 Minerva Surgical, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc., 594 U.S. 559 (2021) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Minerva Surgical, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“a common-law principle is well established,”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
51 Page(s) Mishawaka Rubber & Woolen Manufacturing Co. v. S.S. Kresge Co., 316 U.S. 203 (1942) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Mishawaka Rubber & Woolen Manufacturing Co. v. S. S. Kresge Co”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“[t]here may well be a windfall to the trade-mark owner where it is impossible to isolate the profits which are attributable to the use of the infringing mark.”
Found — minor punctuation or spacing differences.
52 Mowry v. Whitney, 81 U.S. (14 Wall.) 620 (1872) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Mowry v. Whitney”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
53 NLRB v. Deena Artware, Inc., 361 U.S. 398 (1960) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “National Labor Relations Board v. Deena Artware, Inc”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
54 Penhallow v. Doane's Administrators, 3 U.S. (3 Dall.) 54 (1795) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Penhallow v. Doane's Administrators”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
55 Pugin v. Garland, 599 U.S. 600 (2023) flagged
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
0 of 1 located
Why we flagged this
- At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Pugin v. Garland”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“[u]nlimited enhancement”
Not found in the cited opinion. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.
56 Rees v. Watertown, 86 U.S. (19 Wall.) 107 (1874) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Rees v. City of Watertown”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
57 Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc., 590 U.S. 212 (2020) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 4 of 4 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“read[ing] into statutes words that aren't there.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“principles of equity”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“the place for reconciling competing and incommensurable policy goals”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“limited role is to read and apply the law those policymakers have ordained.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
58 Root v. Railway Co., 105 U.S. 189 (1882) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Root v. Railway Co”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“an account of the profits realized by the infringer.”
Found — minor punctuation or spacing differences.
59 Rubber Co. v. Goodyear, 76 U.S. (9 Wall.) 788 (1870) flagged
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
3 of 4 located
Why we flagged this
- At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Rubber Co. v. Goodyear”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“stated two accounts: one against the Providence Company and the other against the Columbian Company, which he f[ound] to be the Providence Company under another name”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
“[t]he business as to both was so intermingled and confused that approximate results only *** were attainable by but one process.”
The brief's quote matches 98% of the cited opinion, but in separate passages — not as one continuous quote. This typically means the brief either paraphrased inside the quotation marks (Bluebook Rule 5.2 requires brackets for any substitution) or silently omitted intervening text (Bluebook Rule 5.3 requires “. . .” for omissions). Compare the brief's quotation against the cited opinion.
What diverges
brief: …that approximate results only *** were attainable by but one pr…
opinion: …that approximate results only were possible, and these were attainable by but one pr…
“an account impossible as to the business done in their name,”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“makes the wrong-doer liable for actual, not possible, gains.”
Found — minor punctuation or spacing differences.
60 Sammons v. Colonial Press, 126 F.2d 341 (1st Cir. 1945) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Sammons v. Colonial Press, Inc”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
61 SEC v. Jarkesy, 144 S. Ct. 2117 (2024) brief quality flagged
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
Brief-quality observations
- A case named 'Securities and Exchange Commission, Petitioner v. George R. Jarkesy, Jr., et al.' exists in CourtListener at [{'volume': '603', 'reporter': 'U.S.', 'page': '109'}] (scotus, 2024), but the brief's citation does not match.
How we matched this
The brief's reporter triple is independently confirmed by leagle.com's volume index, and CourtListener's docket index identifies the same case.
Quotes attributed to this authority
“while courts of equity could order a defendant to return unjustly obtained funds, only courts of law issued monetary penalties to 'punish culpable individuals.'”
Found word-for-word in the opinion. Brief signaled: “(citation omitted)”.
62 Page(s) Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures Corp., 309 U.S. 390 (1940) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures Corp”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
63 Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures Corp., 106 F.2d 45 (2d Cir. 1939) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures Corporation”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
64 Starbucks Corp. v. McKinney, 144 S. Ct. 1570 (2024) brief quality flagged
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 5 of 5 located
Brief-quality observations
- A case named 'Starbucks Corporation, Petitioner v. M. Kathleen McKinney, Regional Director of Region 15 of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on Behalf of the National Labor Relations Board' exists in CourtListener at [{'volume': '602', 'reporter': 'U.S.', 'page': '339'}] (scotus, 2024), but the brief's citation does not match.
How we matched this
The brief's reporter triple is independently confirmed by leagle.com's volume index, and CourtListener's docket index identifies the same case.
Quotes attributed to this authority
“traditional equitable principles”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“clear command from Congress”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“to jettison the normal equitable rules”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“traditional equitable principles governing”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“clear command”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
65 Taggart v. Lorenzen, 587 U.S. 554 (2019) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 3 of 3 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Taggart v. Lorenzen”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“incorporate[s]”
Found word-for-word in the opinion. Brief signaled: “(citation omitted)”.
“old soil”
Found word-for-word in the opinion. Brief signaled: “(citation omitted)”.
“the traditional standards in equity practice.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion. Brief signaled: “(citation omitted)”.
66 Trade-Mark Cases, 100 U.S. 82 (1879) brief quality flagged
Case exists as cited?
Not verified
Opinion text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
Brief-quality observations
- Citation triple resolves in CourtListener to 'United States v. Steffens', not 'Trade-Mark Cases'.
67 United States v. Bestfoods, 524 U.S. 51 (1998) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 15 of 15 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “United States v. Bestfoods”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“the corporate veil”
Found word-for-word in the opinion. Brief signaled: “(citation omitted)”.
“'speak directly'”
Found word-for-word in the opinion. Brief signaled: “(citation omitted)”.
“bedrock principle”
Found word-for-word in the opinion. Brief signaled: “(citation omitted)”.
“respect for corporate distinctions.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion. Brief signaled: “(citation omitted)”.
“speak[s]directly”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible. Brief signaled: “(citation omitted)”.
“speak directly to the question.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion. Brief signaled: “(citation omitted)”.
“a parent corporation *** is not liable for the acts of its subsidiaries”
Found — the brief signaled the modification with a Bluebook parenthetical, so we used a relaxed match. Brief signaled: “(citation omitted)”.
“deeply 'ingrained in our economic and legal systems.'”
Found word-for-word in the opinion. Brief signaled: “(citation omitted)”.
“speak[s]directly to the question”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible. Brief signaled: “(citation omitted)”.
“congressional silence”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“a matter as fundamental as the liability implications of corporate ownership”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“venerable common-law”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“nothing in CERCLA purports to reject th[at] bedrock principle,”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
“when (but only when) the corporate veil may be pierced.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“bedrock principle”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
68 United States v. Burr, 25 F. Cas. 30 (C.C.D. Va. 1807) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “United States v. Burr”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
69 Washingtonian Publishing Co. v. Pearson, 140 F.2d 465 (D.C. Cir. 1944) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Washingtonian Pub. Co. v. Pearson”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
70 Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Wagner Electric & Manufacturing Co., 225 U.S. 604 (1912) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 3 of 3 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Wagner Electric & Manufacturing Co”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“profits ha[ve] been made”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
“it [wa]s impossible to make a mathematical or approximate apportionment”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
“penalize the infringer.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
71 Whitman v. American Trucking Ass'ns, 531 U.S. 457 (2001) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“does not alter the fundamental details of a regulatory scheme in vague terms or ancillary provisions.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
72 77 F.4th 265 brief quality flagged
Case exists as cited?
Not verified
Opinion text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
Brief-quality observations
- Case name in the brief differs materially from the official record.
73 2021 WL 5217016 flagged
Case exists as cited?
Not verified
Opinion text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
Why we flagged this
- No matching case-law record found via CourtListener (citation lookup, docket lookup, name search), court-specific adapters, govinfo, or web search. The citation triple did not appear in any of our case-law databases.
74 2022 WL 1439826 flagged
Case exists as cited?
Not verified
Opinion text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
Why we flagged this
- No matching case-law record found via CourtListener (citation lookup, docket lookup, name search), court-specific adapters, govinfo, or web search. The citation triple did not appear in any of our case-law databases.
75 591 U.S. at 90 flagged
Case exists as cited?
Not verified
Opinion text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· opinion text unavailable
Why we flagged this
- No matching case-law record found via CourtListener (citation lookup, docket lookup, name search), court-specific adapters, govinfo, or web search. The citation triple did not appear in any of our case-law databases.
- We couldn't retrieve the source text from any of our public sources.
Why we couldn't check the quotes
We couldn't retrieve any opinion text for this citation from our public sources. The case may only be available on a paid service like Westlaw or Lexis. Without the text, we can't check whether the brief's quotes appear in the opinion.
Quotes attributed to this authority
These quotes have not been verified because the opinion text wasn't available.
impos[ing] disgorgement liability on a wrongdoer for benefits that accrue to his affiliates *** could transform any equitable profits-focused remedy into a penalty.
Not verified: opinion text unavailable.
76 15 U.S.C. § 1117 flagged
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
32 of 33 located
Why we flagged this
- At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“defendant's profits”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“defendant's profits.”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“the principles of equity”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“excessive.”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“[s]uch sum in either of the above circumstances shall constitute compensation and not a penalty.”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“defendant's profits.”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“defendant must prove”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“cost[s]or deduction[s]”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
“shall constitute compensation and not a penalty.”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“defendant's profits.”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“defendant's profits.”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“the plaintiff *** to prove defendant's sales only,”
The brief's quote matches 65% of the cited source text, but in separate passages — not as one continuous quote. This typically means the brief either paraphrased inside the quotation marks (Bluebook Rule 5.2 requires brackets for any substitution) or silently omitted intervening text (Bluebook Rule 5.3 requires “. . .” for omissions). Compare the brief's quotation against the cited source text.
What diverges
brief: …the plaintiff *** to prove defendants sales onl…
opinion: …shall be required to prove defendants sales onl…
“defendant [to] prove all elements of cost or deduction claimed.”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
“defendant's profits,”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“defendant's profits,”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“defendant's profits.”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“the principles of equity”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“find[s]that the amount of the recovery based on profits is either inadequate or excessive,”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
“may in its discretion enter judgment for such sum as the court shall find to be just, according to the circumstances of the case.”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“subject to the principles of equity.”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“defendant's profits”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“defendant's sales”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“principles of equity”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“principles of equity”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“amount of the recovery based on profits”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“[un]just.”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“just.”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“shall constitute compensation and not a penalty”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“any damages”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“in exceptional cases,”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“defendant's profits”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“the plaintiff shall be required to prove defendant's sales only”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“must prove all elements of cost or deduction claimed.”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
77 16 Stat. 211 manual verify
Citation exists?
Not verified
Source text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· source text unavailable
Please verify this one manually
This citation falls outside our automated coverage. Law reviews, treatises, restatements, and legislative packages predating govinfo's collection window don't have a free full-text source we can reliably retrieve. The citation itself looks well-formed; a reviewer with access to HeinOnline, Westlaw, Lexis, or a law library can confirm. This isn't a defect in the citation; it's a coverage gap in our automated sources.
Quotes attributed to this authority
These quotes have not been verified because the source text wasn't retrieved.
damages for such wrongful use of said trade-mark
Not verified: source text unavailable.
remedy according to the course of equity to enjoin the wrongful use of his trade-mark and to recover compensation therefor.
Not verified: source text unavailable.
78 35 Stat. 1081 manual verify
Citation exists?
Not verified
Source text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· source text unavailable
Please verify this one manually
This citation falls outside our automated coverage. Law reviews, treatises, restatements, and legislative packages predating govinfo's collection window don't have a free full-text source we can reliably retrieve. The citation itself looks well-formed; a reviewer with access to HeinOnline, Westlaw, Lexis, or a law library can confirm. This isn't a defect in the citation; it's a coverage gap in our automated sources.
Quotes attributed to this authority
These quotes have not been verified because the source text wasn't retrieved.
in lieu of actual damages and profits such damages as to the court shall appear to be just
Not verified: source text unavailable.
regarded as a penalty
Not verified: source text unavailable.
79 Pub. L. No. 93-600, § 3, 88 Stat. 1955 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· medium confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
80 Pub. L. No. 98-473, § 1503(2)(B), 98 Stat. 2182 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· medium confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
81 Pub. L. No. 104-153, § 7, 110 Stat. 1388 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· medium confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
82 42 U.S.C. § 9601 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
83 60 Stat. 427 manual verify
Citation exists?
Not verified
Source text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
Please verify this one manually
This citation falls outside our automated coverage. Law reviews, treatises, restatements, and legislative packages predating govinfo's collection window don't have a free full-text source we can reliably retrieve. The citation itself looks well-formed; a reviewer with access to HeinOnline, Westlaw, Lexis, or a law library can confirm. This isn't a defect in the citation; it's a coverage gap in our automated sources.
84 15 U.S.C. § 1051 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
85 15 U.S.C. § 1116 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
86 15 U.S.C. § 1127 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
Pass· 3 of 3 located
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“word, name, symbol, or device”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“to identify and distinguish his or her goods”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“those manufactured or sold by others.”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
87 Pub. L. No. 110-403, § 104, 122 Stat. 4259 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· medium confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
88 21 Stat. 502 manual verify
Citation exists?
Not verified
Source text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· source text unavailable
Please verify this one manually
This citation falls outside our automated coverage. Law reviews, treatises, restatements, and legislative packages predating govinfo's collection window don't have a free full-text source we can reliably retrieve. The citation itself looks well-formed; a reviewer with access to HeinOnline, Westlaw, Lexis, or a law library can confirm. This isn't a defect in the citation; it's a coverage gap in our automated sources.
Quotes attributed to this authority
These quotes have not been verified because the source text wasn't retrieved.
in commerce with foreign nations, or with the Indian tribes.
Not verified: source text unavailable.
89 33 Stat. 724 manual verify
Citation exists?
Not verified
Source text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· source text unavailable
Please verify this one manually
This citation falls outside our automated coverage. Law reviews, treatises, restatements, and legislative packages predating govinfo's collection window don't have a free full-text source we can reliably retrieve. The citation itself looks well-formed; a reviewer with access to HeinOnline, Westlaw, Lexis, or a law library can confirm. This isn't a defect in the citation; it's a coverage gap in our automated sources.
Quotes attributed to this authority
These quotes have not been verified because the source text wasn't retrieved.
used in commerce *** among the several States.
Not verified: source text unavailable.
90 17 U.S.C. § 504 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“the infringer's profits”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
91 28 U.S.C. § 1254 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
92 29 U.S.C. § 1109 flagged
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
1 of 2 located
Why we flagged this
- At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“any profits of [a]fiduciary”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
“other equitable * ** relief.”
Not found in the cited source text. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.
93 Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(a) clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
94 Fed. R. Civ. P. 10(a) clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
95 Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a) flagged
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
0 of 1 located
Why we flagged this
- At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“chang[e]the party *** against whom a claim is asserted.”
The brief's quote matches 65% of the cited source text, but in separate passages — not as one continuous quote. This typically means the brief either paraphrased inside the quotation marks (Bluebook Rule 5.2 requires brackets for any substitution) or silently omitted intervening text (Bluebook Rule 5.3 requires “. . .” for omissions). Compare the brief's quotation against the cited source text.
What diverges
brief: …changthe party *** against whom a claim is asser…
opinion: …aming of the party against whom a claim is asser…
96 Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(c) clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
97 31 Emory L.J. 747 manual verify
Citation exists?
Not verified
Source text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
Please verify this one manually
This citation falls outside our automated coverage. Law reviews, treatises, restatements, and legislative packages predating govinfo's collection window don't have a free full-text source we can reliably retrieve. The citation itself looks well-formed; a reviewer with access to HeinOnline, Westlaw, Lexis, or a law library can confirm. This isn't a defect in the citation; it's a coverage gap in our automated sources.
103 16 Stat. 198 manual verify
Citation exists?
Not verified
Source text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
Please verify this one manually
This citation falls outside our automated coverage. Law reviews, treatises, restatements, and legislative packages predating govinfo's collection window don't have a free full-text source we can reliably retrieve. The citation itself looks well-formed; a reviewer with access to HeinOnline, Westlaw, Lexis, or a law library can confirm. This isn't a defect in the citation; it's a coverage gap in our automated sources.
104 21 Stat. 504 manual verify
Citation exists?
Not verified
Source text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· source text unavailable
Please verify this one manually
This citation falls outside our automated coverage. Law reviews, treatises, restatements, and legislative packages predating govinfo's collection window don't have a free full-text source we can reliably retrieve. The citation itself looks well-formed; a reviewer with access to HeinOnline, Westlaw, Lexis, or a law library can confirm. This isn't a defect in the citation; it's a coverage gap in our automated sources.
Quotes attributed to this authority
These quotes have not been verified because the source text wasn't retrieved.
remedy according to the course of equity to enjoin the wrongful use of such trade-mark *** and to recover compensation therefor.
Not verified: source text unavailable.
105 33 Stat. 728 manual verify
Citation exists?
Not verified
Source text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· source text unavailable
Please verify this one manually
This citation falls outside our automated coverage. Law reviews, treatises, restatements, and legislative packages predating govinfo's collection window don't have a free full-text source we can reliably retrieve. The citation itself looks well-formed; a reviewer with access to HeinOnline, Westlaw, Lexis, or a law library can confirm. This isn't a defect in the citation; it's a coverage gap in our automated sources.
Quotes attributed to this authority
These quotes have not been verified because the source text wasn't retrieved.
actual damages
Not verified: source text unavailable.
three times the amount
Not verified: source text unavailable.
106 33 Stat. 729 manual verify
Citation exists?
Not verified
Source text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· source text unavailable
Please verify this one manually
This citation falls outside our automated coverage. Law reviews, treatises, restatements, and legislative packages predating govinfo's collection window don't have a free full-text source we can reliably retrieve. The citation itself looks well-formed; a reviewer with access to HeinOnline, Westlaw, Lexis, or a law library can confirm. This isn't a defect in the citation; it's a coverage gap in our automated sources.
Quotes attributed to this authority
These quotes have not been verified because the source text wasn't retrieved.
to grant injunctions, according to the course and principles of equity,
Not verified: source text unavailable.
profits to be accounted for by the defendant.
Not verified: source text unavailable.
the plaintiff [was] required to prove defendant's sales only,
Not verified: source text unavailable.
defendant must prove all elements of cost which are claimed
Not verified: source text unavailable.
107 15 U.S.C. § 34 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“grant injunctions, according to the principles of equity.”
This quote does not appear in the cited opinion's text, but may be a canonical restatement of the opinion — the language appears in another opinion this brief cites.
108 60 Stat. 439 manual verify
Citation exists?
Not verified
Source text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
Please verify this one manually
This citation falls outside our automated coverage. Law reviews, treatises, restatements, and legislative packages predating govinfo's collection window don't have a free full-text source we can reliably retrieve. The citation itself looks well-formed; a reviewer with access to HeinOnline, Westlaw, Lexis, or a law library can confirm. This isn't a defect in the citation; it's a coverage gap in our automated sources.
109 15 U.S.C. § 35 flagged
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
0 of 4 located
Why we flagged this
- At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“subject to the principles of equity.”
Not found in the cited source text. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.
“Defendant's Profits”
Not found in the cited source text. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.
“the plaintiff shall be entitled *** to recover (1) defendant's profits, (2) any damages sustained by the plaintiff, and (3) the costs of the action.”
Not found in the cited source text. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.
“shall constitute compensation and not a penalty.”
Not found in the cited source text. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.
110 60 Stat. 440 manual verify
Citation exists?
Not verified
Source text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· source text unavailable
Please verify this one manually
This citation falls outside our automated coverage. Law reviews, treatises, restatements, and legislative packages predating govinfo's collection window don't have a free full-text source we can reliably retrieve. The citation itself looks well-formed; a reviewer with access to HeinOnline, Westlaw, Lexis, or a law library can confirm. This isn't a defect in the citation; it's a coverage gap in our automated sources.
Quotes attributed to this authority
These quotes have not been verified because the source text wasn't retrieved.
three times
Not verified: source text unavailable.
136 "§ manual verify
Citation exists?
Not verified
Source text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· source text unavailable
Please verify this one manually
This citation falls outside our automated coverage. Law reviews, treatises, restatements, and legislative packages predating govinfo's collection window don't have a free full-text source we can reliably retrieve. The citation itself looks well-formed; a reviewer with access to HeinOnline, Westlaw, Lexis, or a law library can confirm. This isn't a defect in the citation; it's a coverage gap in our automated sources.
Quotes attributed to this authority
These quotes have not been verified because the source text wasn't retrieved.
§ 1117(a) speaks to the infringer's profits.
Not verified: source text unavailable.
not third parties, was the infringer.
Not verified: source text unavailable.
revenues from the affiliated companies
Not verified: source text unavailable.
were never realized by [petitioner]
Not verified: source text unavailable.
139 Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(a)(1)(B) flagged
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
1 of 2 located
Why we flagged this
- At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“name all the parties”
Not found in the cited source text. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.
“directed to the defendant,”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
149 First Amendment clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
N/A
How we matched this
Constitutional citation.
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
153 21 Stat. 503 manual verify
Citation exists?
Not verified
Source text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
Please verify this one manually
This citation falls outside our automated coverage. Law reviews, treatises, restatements, and legislative packages predating govinfo's collection window don't have a free full-text source we can reliably retrieve. The citation itself looks well-formed; a reviewer with access to HeinOnline, Westlaw, Lexis, or a law library can confirm. This isn't a defect in the citation; it's a coverage gap in our automated sources.
§Record & filing references (44)
Citations to filings in this case or its record — appendices, docket entries, pleadings. These aren't published authority, so we don't retrieve or verify them. They're listed here so every citation in the brief is accounted for.
Pet. App. 1a-61a
appendix
not verified
Pet. App. 96a-120a
appendix
not verified
Pet. App. 62a-95a
appendix
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- not provided direct evidence of lost sales
Pet. App. 122a
appendix
not verified
Pet. App. 39a
appendix
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- as a single corporate entity for the purpose of calculating revenues
- as a single corporate entity for the purpose of calculating revenues.
Pet. App. 43a-44a
appendix
not verified
J.A. 72
appendix
not verified
Pet. App. 4a
appendix
not verified
J.A. 71
appendix
not verified
J.A. 73-74, 85-87
appendix
not verified
Pet. App. 82a
appendix
not verified
J.A. 83-84
appendix
not verified
Pet. App. 44a, 83a
appendix
not verified
J.A. 72-73, 81-82
appendix
not verified
Pet. App. 4a-5a
appendix
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- Dewberry.
Pet. App. 7a
appendix
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- Dewberry Group
- Studio Dewberry
Pet. App. 9a
appendix
not verified
J.A. 1-38
appendix
not verified
J.A. 4
appendix
not verified
J.A. 102, 262, 272, 282
appendix
not verified
J.A. 331
appendix
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- That [respondent] did not name the [affiliates] as defendants or allege contributory infringement or alter-ego liability is of no moment.
Pet. App. 84a
appendix
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- as a single corporate entity when calculating the revenues and profits
- the equitable purposes of the Lanham Act's disgorgement remedy.
- single corporate entity
- that, but-for the revenue generated by the [affiliates], [petitioner] as a single tax entity would not exist
- over the past 30 years.
Pet. App. 85a-86a
appendix
not verified
Pet. App. 94a
appendix
not verified
J.A. 335
appendix
not verified
Pet. App. 11a-12a
appendix
not verified
Pet. App. 3a-48a
appendix
not verified
Pet. App. 39a-40a
appendix
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- did not receive the revenues from its infringing behavior directly.
- show[n]losses on its tax returns
- branding for its affiliates, who in turn generate profits using that branding on their lease, loan, and other promotional materials.
- treated [petitioner] and its affiliates as a single corporate entity for the purpose of calculating revenues generated by [petitioner's] use of infringing marks.
Pet. App. 43a
appendix
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- conside[r]the revenues of entities under common ownership with [petitioner],
- grant of profit disgorgement is 'subject to the principles of equity,'
- weig[h]the equities of the dispute.
- while [petitioner] did not receive the revenues from its infringing behavior directly, it still benefited from its infringing relationship with its affiliates
- [a]dmonishing courts for using their discretion
- ris[k]handing potential trademark infringers the blueprint for using corporate formalities to insulate their infringement from financial consequences
- purpose.
- piercing their corporate veils.
Pet. App. 58a
appendix
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- use of revenues from separate companies,
Pet. App. 58a-59a
appendix
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- [t]here is no loophole that lets these entities infringe with impunity,
- kn[e]w of no law that allows courts * * * to disregard those options and simply add the revenues from non-parties to a defendant's revenues for purposes of evaluating the defendant's profits.
- -that "were never realized by [petitioner]" itself was "incorrect as a matter of law." Id. at 60a. Judge Quattlebaum also disagreed with the majority's policy concern that respecting
- insulate
Pet. App. 45a
appendix
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- weigh[ing]
- the equities.
- weigh[ing]
- the equities.
- subject to the principles of equity.
- defendant's profits
- ru[n] counter to
- purpose of section 1117
- insulate their infringement from financial consequences.
- fundamental desire
J.A. 39
appendix
not verified
Pet. App. 82a-83a
appendix
not verified
J.A. 262, 272, 282
appendix
not verified
J.A. 73-74, 84-86
appendix
not verified
J.A. 81-82
appendix
not verified
Pet. App. 60a
appendix
not verified
Pet. App. 86a
appendix
not verified
Opp. App. 55a
appendix
not verified
Pet. App. 43a, 82a
appendix
not verified
Pet. App. 87a
appendix
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- defendant's profits,
Pet. App. 79a
appendix
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- ordered disgorgement of more than just 'defendant's profits.'
Pet. App. 59a-60a
appendix
not verified