Report
garland-v-vanderstok-us-pet
How this report was built
Cornell LII, CourtListener, govinfo
45 matched in source text
Verification runs deterministically against authoritative public databases. Your brief is not sent to OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or any other third-party model.
Click any citation below to see how we verified it, the matched source, and a per-quote breakdown.
§Authorities
1 Cases: Abramski v. United States, 573 U.S. 169 (2014) brief quality flagged
- A case named 'Bruce James Abramski, Jr. v. United States' exists in CourtListener at [{'volume': '134', 'reporter': 'S. Ct.', 'page': '2259'}, {'volume': '189', 'reporter': 'L. Ed. 2d', 'page': '262'}, {'volume': '2014', 'reporter': 'D.A.R.', 'page': '7569'}, {'volume': '2014', 'reporter': 'U.S. LEXIS', 'page': '4170'}, {'volume': '2014', 'reporter': 'WL', 'page': '2676779'}, {'volume': '24', 'reporter': 'Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S', 'page': '859'}, {'volume': '82', 'reporter': 'U.S.L.W.', 'page': '4495'}] (scotus, 2014), but the brief's citation does not match.
- At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.
2 Cases-Continued: Page Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998) clean
3 Barrett v. United States, 423 U.S. 212 (1976) clean
4 California v. ATF, No. 20-cv-6761, 2024 WL 779604 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2024) flagged
- At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.
5 District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008) clean
6 Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Navarro, 584 U.S. 79 (2018) flagged
- At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.
7 Garland v. Cargill, No. 22-976, 2024 WL 2981505 (U.S. June 14, 2024) clean
8 Huddleston v. United States, 415 U.S. 814 (1974) clean
9 Iancu v. Brunetti, 588 U.S. 388 (2019) clean
10 INS v. National Ctr. for Immigrants' Rights, Inc., 502 U.S. 183 (1991) clean
11 Johnson v. United States, 576 U.S. 591 (2015) clean
12 Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. Coughlin, 599 U.S. 382 (2023) clean
13 Maracich v. Spears, 570 U.S. 48 (2013) clean
14 Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, 590 U.S. 165 (2020) clean
15 New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022) clean
16 Ocasio v. United States, 578 U.S. 282 (2016) flagged
- At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.
17 Pugin v. Garland, 599 U.S. 600 (2023) clean
18 The Emily, 22 U.S. (9 Wheat.) 381 (1824) clean
19 United States v. Quiroz, 449 F.2d 583 (9th Cir. 1971) clean
20 United States v. Rahimi, No. 22-915, 2024 WL 3074728 (U.S. June 21, 2024) clean
21 United States v. Ryles, 988 F.2d 13 clean
22 States v. 16,179 Molso Italian . Caliber Winlee Derringer Convertible Starter Guns, 443 F.2d 463 clean
23 United States v. Stewart, 451 F.3d 1071 (9th Cir. 2006) flagged
- At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.
24 United States v. Wick, 697 Fed. Appx. 507 (9th Cir. 2017) clean
25 United States v. Williams, 553 U.S. 285 (2008) clean
26 86 F.4th 179 brief quality flagged
- Case name in the brief differs materially from the official record.
27 680 F. Supp. 3d 741 flagged
- We couldn't independently verify this citation against our public sources.
28 144 S. Ct. 44 flagged
- We couldn't independently verify this citation against our public sources.
29 2023 WL 4945360 flagged
- No matching case-law record found via CourtListener (citation lookup, docket lookup, name search), court-specific adapters, govinfo, or web search. The citation triple did not appear in any of our case-law databases.
30 144 S. Ct. 338 flagged
- We couldn't independently verify this citation against our public sources.
31 2023 WL 5978332 flagged
- No matching case-law record found via CourtListener (citation lookup, docket lookup, name search), court-specific adapters, govinfo, or web search. The citation triple did not appear in any of our case-law databases.
32 87 Fed. Reg. at 24,659 flagged
- No matching case-law record found via CourtListener (citation lookup, docket lookup, name search), court-specific adapters, govinfo, or web search. The citation triple did not appear in any of our case-law databases.
- We couldn't retrieve the source text from any of our public sources.
We couldn't retrieve any opinion text for this citation from our public sources. The case may only be available on a paid service like Westlaw or Lexis. Without the text, we can't check whether the brief's quotes appear in the opinion.
These quotes have not been verified because the opinion text wasn't available.
33 87 Fed. Reg. at 24,667, 24,710 flagged
- No matching case-law record found via CourtListener (citation lookup, docket lookup, name search), court-specific adapters, govinfo, or web search. The citation triple did not appear in any of our case-law databases.
- We couldn't retrieve the source text from any of our public sources.
We couldn't retrieve any opinion text for this citation from our public sources. The case may only be available on a paid service like Westlaw or Lexis. Without the text, we can't check whether the brief's quotes appear in the opinion.
These quotes have not been verified because the opinion text wasn't available.
34 87 Fed. Reg. at 24,652, 24,654 flagged
- No matching case-law record found via CourtListener (citation lookup, docket lookup, name search), court-specific adapters, govinfo, or web search. The citation triple did not appear in any of our case-law databases.
- We couldn't retrieve the source text from any of our public sources.
We couldn't retrieve any opinion text for this citation from our public sources. The case may only be available on a paid service like Westlaw or Lexis. Without the text, we can't check whether the brief's quotes appear in the opinion.
These quotes have not been verified because the opinion text wasn't available.
35 the Act. 87 Fed. Reg. at 24,685 flagged
- No matching case-law record found via CourtListener (citation lookup, docket lookup, name search), court-specific adapters, govinfo, or web search. The citation triple did not appear in any of our case-law databases.
- We couldn't retrieve the source text from any of our public sources.
We couldn't retrieve any opinion text for this citation from our public sources. The case may only be available on a paid service like Westlaw or Lexis. Without the text, we can't check whether the brief's quotes appear in the opinion.
These quotes have not been verified because the opinion text wasn't available.
36 87 Fed. Reg. at 24,663 flagged
- No matching case-law record found via CourtListener (citation lookup, docket lookup, name search), court-specific adapters, govinfo, or web search. The citation triple did not appear in any of our case-law databases.
- We couldn't retrieve the source text from any of our public sources.
We couldn't retrieve any opinion text for this citation from our public sources. The case may only be available on a paid service like Westlaw or Lexis. Without the text, we can't check whether the brief's quotes appear in the opinion.
These quotes have not been verified because the opinion text wasn't available.
37 87 Fed. Reg. at 24,655, 24,662-24,663 flagged
- No matching case-law record found via CourtListener (citation lookup, docket lookup, name search), court-specific adapters, govinfo, or web search. The citation triple did not appear in any of our case-law databases.
- We couldn't retrieve the source text from any of our public sources.
We couldn't retrieve any opinion text for this citation from our public sources. The case may only be available on a paid service like Westlaw or Lexis. Without the text, we can't check whether the brief's quotes appear in the opinion.
These quotes have not been verified because the opinion text wasn't available.
38 87 Fed. Reg. at 24,686 flagged
- No matching case-law record found via CourtListener (citation lookup, docket lookup, name search), court-specific adapters, govinfo, or web search. The citation triple did not appear in any of our case-law databases.
- We couldn't retrieve the source text from any of our public sources.
We couldn't retrieve any opinion text for this citation from our public sources. The case may only be available on a paid service like Westlaw or Lexis. Without the text, we can't check whether the brief's quotes appear in the opinion.
These quotes have not been verified because the opinion text wasn't available.
39 87 Fed. Reg. at 24,656, 24,659 flagged
- No matching case-law record found via CourtListener (citation lookup, docket lookup, name search), court-specific adapters, govinfo, or web search. The citation triple did not appear in any of our case-law databases.
- We couldn't retrieve the source text from any of our public sources.
We couldn't retrieve any opinion text for this citation from our public sources. The case may only be available on a paid service like Westlaw or Lexis. Without the text, we can't check whether the brief's quotes appear in the opinion.
These quotes have not been verified because the opinion text wasn't available.
40 87 Fed. Reg. at 24,662 flagged
- No matching case-law record found via CourtListener (citation lookup, docket lookup, name search), court-specific adapters, govinfo, or web search. The citation triple did not appear in any of our case-law databases.
- We couldn't retrieve the source text from any of our public sources.
We couldn't retrieve any opinion text for this citation from our public sources. The case may only be available on a paid service like Westlaw or Lexis. Without the text, we can't check whether the brief's quotes appear in the opinion.
These quotes have not been verified because the opinion text wasn't available.
41 87 Fed. Reg. at 24,699-24,700 flagged
- No matching case-law record found via CourtListener (citation lookup, docket lookup, name search), court-specific adapters, govinfo, or web search. The citation triple did not appear in any of our case-law databases.
- We couldn't retrieve the source text from any of our public sources.
We couldn't retrieve any opinion text for this citation from our public sources. The case may only be available on a paid service like Westlaw or Lexis. Without the text, we can't check whether the brief's quotes appear in the opinion.
These quotes have not been verified because the opinion text wasn't available.
42 87 Fed. Reg. at 24,700 flagged
- No matching case-law record found via CourtListener (citation lookup, docket lookup, name search), court-specific adapters, govinfo, or web search. The citation triple did not appear in any of our case-law databases.
- We couldn't retrieve the source text from any of our public sources.
We couldn't retrieve any opinion text for this citation from our public sources. The case may only be available on a paid service like Westlaw or Lexis. Without the text, we can't check whether the brief's quotes appear in the opinion.
These quotes have not been verified because the opinion text wasn't available.
43 87 Fed. Reg. at 24,730 flagged
- No matching case-law record found via CourtListener (citation lookup, docket lookup, name search), court-specific adapters, govinfo, or web search. The citation triple did not appear in any of our case-law databases.
44 87 Fed. Reg. at 24,661 flagged
- No matching case-law record found via CourtListener (citation lookup, docket lookup, name search), court-specific adapters, govinfo, or web search. The citation triple did not appear in any of our case-law databases.
- We couldn't retrieve the source text from any of our public sources.
We couldn't retrieve any opinion text for this citation from our public sources. The case may only be available on a paid service like Westlaw or Lexis. Without the text, we can't check whether the brief's quotes appear in the opinion.
These quotes have not been verified because the opinion text wasn't available.
45 87 Fed. Reg. at 24,684-24,685 flagged
- No matching case-law record found via CourtListener (citation lookup, docket lookup, name search), court-specific adapters, govinfo, or web search. The citation triple did not appear in any of our case-law databases.
- We couldn't retrieve the source text from any of our public sources.
We couldn't retrieve any opinion text for this citation from our public sources. The case may only be available on a paid service like Westlaw or Lexis. Without the text, we can't check whether the brief's quotes appear in the opinion.
These quotes have not been verified because the opinion text wasn't available.
46 87 Fed. Reg. at 24,668 flagged
- No matching case-law record found via CourtListener (citation lookup, docket lookup, name search), court-specific adapters, govinfo, or web search. The citation triple did not appear in any of our case-law databases.
47 86 Fed. Reg. at 27,726 flagged
- No matching case-law record found via CourtListener (citation lookup, docket lookup, name search), court-specific adapters, govinfo, or web search. The citation triple did not appear in any of our case-law databases.
48 87 Fed. Reg. 24,652 manual verify
This citation falls outside our automated coverage. Law reviews, treatises, restatements, and legislative packages predating govinfo's collection window don't have a free full-text source we can reliably retrieve. The citation itself looks well-formed; a reviewer with access to HeinOnline, Westlaw, Lexis, or a law library can confirm. This isn't a defect in the citation; it's a coverage gap in our automated sources.
These quotes have not been verified because the source text wasn't retrieved.
49 Pub. L. No. 90-351 retrieval gap
These quotes have not been verified because the source text wasn't retrieved. Use the link above to open the source and compare directly.
50 82 Stat. 225 manual verify
This citation falls outside our automated coverage. Law reviews, treatises, restatements, and legislative packages predating govinfo's collection window don't have a free full-text source we can reliably retrieve. The citation itself looks well-formed; a reviewer with access to HeinOnline, Westlaw, Lexis, or a law library can confirm. This isn't a defect in the citation; it's a coverage gap in our automated sources.
These quotes have not been verified because the source text wasn't retrieved.
51 48 Stat. 1236 manual verify
This citation falls outside our automated coverage. Law reviews, treatises, restatements, and legislative packages predating govinfo's collection window don't have a free full-text source we can reliably retrieve. The citation itself looks well-formed; a reviewer with access to HeinOnline, Westlaw, Lexis, or a law library can confirm. This isn't a defect in the citation; it's a coverage gap in our automated sources.
52 33 Fed. Reg. 18,555 manual verify
This citation falls outside our automated coverage. Law reviews, treatises, restatements, and legislative packages predating govinfo's collection window don't have a free full-text source we can reliably retrieve. The citation itself looks well-formed; a reviewer with access to HeinOnline, Westlaw, Lexis, or a law library can confirm. This isn't a defect in the citation; it's a coverage gap in our automated sources.
These quotes have not been verified because the source text wasn't retrieved.
53 86 Fed. Reg. 27,720 manual verify
This citation falls outside our automated coverage. Law reviews, treatises, restatements, and legislative packages predating govinfo's collection window don't have a free full-text source we can reliably retrieve. The citation itself looks well-formed; a reviewer with access to HeinOnline, Westlaw, Lexis, or a law library can confirm. This isn't a defect in the citation; it's a coverage gap in our automated sources.
These quotes have not been verified because the source text wasn't retrieved.
68 52 Stat. 1250 manual verify
This citation falls outside our automated coverage. Law reviews, treatises, restatements, and legislative packages predating govinfo's collection window don't have a free full-text source we can reliably retrieve. The citation itself looks well-formed; a reviewer with access to HeinOnline, Westlaw, Lexis, or a law library can confirm. This isn't a defect in the citation; it's a coverage gap in our automated sources.
77 Id. clean
78 Pub. L. No. 90-531 retrieval gap
These quotes have not been verified because the source text wasn't retrieved. Use the link above to open the source and compare directly.
79 U.S. Const. Amend. II clean
80 Pub. L. No. 75-785, 52 Stat. 1250 clean
§Record & filing references (69)
Citations to filings in this case or its record — appendices, docket entries, pleadings. These aren't published authority, so we don't retrieve or verify them. They're listed here so every citation in the brief is accounted for.
- [a]pproximately 75 minutes
- functional
- an unfinished receiver
- likely qualify as a firearm
- could be converted to functional condition within a few hours
- common hand tools,
- nearly impossible to trace.
- Congress removed this language when it enacted the GCA,
- combination[s]of parts.
- aggregations of weapon parts
- 'firearm.'
- had specific language that authorized regulation of 'any part or parts of ' a firearm.
- any part or parts of
- [a]ssembling a weapon parts kit takes much longer than [the] thirty seconds
- involves many additional steps.
- [b]ecause of these differences,
- readily converted
- takes much longer than thirty seconds
- involves many additional steps.
- destructive device
- 'disassembled'
- the first subsection
- includes "flexible language such as 'designed to or may readily be converted to expel a projectile by the action of an explosive,' * * * the subsection immediately thereafter, which contains the term 'frame or receiver,' does not include such flexibility." Id. at 17a (quoting 18 U.S.C. 921(a)(3)(A)). And the court believed that the Rule improperly treated as "frames or receivers" items that are "not yet frames or receivers but that can easily become frames or receivers" because
- flexible language such as 'designed to or may readily be converted to expel a projectile by the action of an explosive,' * * * the subsection immediately thereafter, which contains the term 'frame or receiver,' does not include such flexibility.
- not yet frames or receivers but that can easily become frames or receivers
- frame or receiver
- understanding of 'frame or receiver'
- closely tracked the public's common understanding of such terms at the time of enactment.
- because ATF may have acted outside of its clear statutory limits in the past does not mandate a decision in its favor today.
- frame or receiver
- materially deviat[ing] from past definitions of these words to encompass items that were not originally understood to fall within the ambit of the [Act].
- for further consideration of the remedy
- holding on the merits.
- that the district court's universal vacatur of the entire Final Rule (i.e., not just the two challenged portions) was overbroad.
- include a weapon parts kit that is designed to or may readily be completed, assembled, restored, or otherwise converted to expel a projectile by the action of an explosive.
- fairly or reasonably efficient, quick, and easy,
- to change or turn from one state to another: alter in form, substance, or quality: transform, transmute.
- to bring to an end often into or as if into a finished or perfected state.
- complete[s]
- readily
- may readily be converted to expel a projectile by the action of an explosive,
- conver[sion],
- destructive device
- any combination of parts either designed or intended for use in converting any device into any destructive device * * * and from which a destructive device may be readily assembled.
- any objects that could, if manufacture is completed, become functional at some ill-defined point in the future
- minute weapon parts that might later be manufactured into functional weapons.
- readily
- are easily removable by a person with novice skill, using common tools, such as a Dremel-type rotary tool, within minutes.
- temporary rails or blocking tabs
- 'partially complete' pistol frame products
- frame or receiver
- 'designed to or may readily be converted to'
- frame or receiver
- set, well-known definitions
- 'a part cannot be both not yet a receiver and a receiver at the same time'
- 80% complete.
- discovered the ease with which they c[ould] acquire the parts for a ghost gun
- ha[d]been buying, building[,] and shooting the homemade guns with alarming frequency.
- debit card
- expel a projectile by the action of an explosive,
- official position concerning the status of the firearms under Federal firearms laws.
- be readily converted to functional condition,
- using basic tools in a reasonable amount of time
- [l]ess than 30 minutes * * * to assemble [into] a functional firearm
- the completion of the missing steps cannot be accomplished with common hand tools.
- major machining operations [we]re required
- the metal frame in which the action of a firearm is fitted and to which the breech end of the barrel is attached
- the main body of the lock in a breech mechanism
- a single hole necessary to install the applicable fire control component, or that has a small piece of plastic that can easily be removed to allow installation of that component,
- the basic structure,
- main body
- firearm
- frame or receiver
- may readily be * * * restored
- any weapon which shoots, is designed to shoot, or can be readily restored to shoot, automatically more than one shot, without manual reloading, by a single function of the trigger,
- frame
- partially complete AR-type receiver with no indexing or machining of any kind performed in the area of the fire control cavity.
- be readily converted to functional condition.
- frame or receiver
- do[es] not make classifications based on the percentage of completeness of a particular item
- not use[]
- [t]he terminology '80% finished.'
- in some cases, items being marketed as '80%' actually meet the definition of a 'firearm'
- prevent easy circumvention of the [Act's] entire regulatory scheme
- critical to public safety.
- reach[ed] the same conclusion
- the rule of lenity.
- restore[s]
- brings [it] back
- former or original state
- completed, assembled, restored, or otherwise converted
- [c]omplete
- [t]o make whole or complete * * * [c]omplete suggests the final stage in assembling parts into a whole