homie-technology-v-nar

1 Aldrich v. McCulloch Properties, Inc., 627 F.2d 1036 (10th Cir. 1980) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · medium confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 1 of 1 located

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Aldrich v. Mccullough Properties”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“the dates given in the complaint make clear that the right sued upon has been extinguished,” Found word-for-word in the opinion.

2 Allergy Research Group LLC v. Rez Candles Inc., No. 2:21-cv-73-TC-JCB, 2022 WL 1004214 (D. Utah Apr. 4, 2022) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

We couldn't independently confirm the reporter triple, but we believe this is the matching case based on CourtListener's docket index. Matched docket: “Allergy Research Group v. Rez Candles”.

View matched docket on CourtListener → View case page on GovInfo →

3 Am. Agencies, LLC v. Sloan, No. 2:13-cv-00283-JNP-CMR, 2020 WL 7024911 (D. Utah Nov. 30, 2020) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 1 of 1 located

How we matched this

We couldn't independently confirm the reporter triple, but we believe this is the matching case based on CourtListener's docket index. Matched docket: “Advanced Recovery Systems v. American Agencies”.

View matched docket on CourtListener → View case page on GovInfo →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“improper means” Found word-for-word in the opinion.

4 Andrx Pharm. v. Biovail Corp. Int'l, 256 F.3d 799 (D.C. Cir. 2001) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 1 of 1 located

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Andrx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Biovail Corp. International”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“A rival has clear standing to challenge the conduct of rivals that is illegal precisely because it tends to exclude competitors from the market.” Found — the brief signaled the modification with a Bluebook parenthetical, so we used a relaxed match. Brief signaled: “(cleaned up)”.

5 Application to Enforce Admin. Subpoenas Duces Tecum of SEC v. Knowles, 87 F.3d 413 (10th Cir. 1996) flagged

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

0 of 1 located

Why we flagged this

• At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Enforce Administrative Subpoenas Duces Tecum of the Securities & Exchange Commission v. Knowles”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“When the personal jurisdiction of a federal court is invoked based upon a federal statute providing for nationwide or worldwide service, the relevant inquiry is whether the respondent has had sufficient minimum contacts with the United States.” The brief's quote matches 90% of the cited opinion, but in separate passages — not as one continuous quote. This typically means the brief either paraphrased inside the quotation marks (Bluebook Rule 5.2 requires brackets for any substitution) or silently omitted intervening text (Bluebook Rule 5.3 requires “. . .” for omissions). Compare the brief's quotation against the cited opinion.

What diverges

brief: …federal statute providing for nationwide or worldwide service, the relevant inquiry…

opinion: …federal statute providing for extraterritorial service, the relevant inquiry…

6 Associated Gen. Contractors, Inc. v. California State Council of Carpenters, 459 U.S. 519 (1983) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 1 of 1 located

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of Carpenters”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“[a]n agreement to restrain trade may be unlawful even though it does not entirely exclude its victims from the market.” Found word-for-word in the opinion.

7 Association of Surgical Assistants v. National Board of Surgical Technology & Surgical Assisting, No. 22-cv-02363-MEH, 2023 WL 7277313 (D. Colo. Sept. 29, 2023) Also appears within the block quote of GDHI Marketing LLC v. Antsel Marketing LLC pacer paywall only

Case exists as cited?

Pass · medium confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

No

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

We couldn't independently confirm the reporter triple, but we believe this is the matching case based on CourtListener's docket index.

View matched docket on CourtListener →

8 Atl. Richfield Co. v. USA Petroleum Co., 495 U.S. 328 (1990) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 1 of 1 located

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Atlantic Richfield Co. v. USA Petroleum Co”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“stems from a competition-reducing aspect or effect of the defendant's behavior.” Found word-for-word in the opinion.

9 Auraria Student Hous. at the Regency, LLC v. Campus Vill. Apartments, LLC, 843 F.3d 1225 (10th Cir. 2016) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Auraria Student Housing at the Regency, LLC v. Campus Village Apartments, LLC”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

10 Automotive Alignment & Body Service, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 953 F.3d 707 (11th Cir. 2020) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · medium confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 1 of 1 located

View opinion on GovInfo →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“shotgun pleading,” Found word-for-word in the opinion.

11 Bd. of Cnty. Comm'rs. v. Wilshire Oil Co., 523 F.2d 125 (10th Cir. 1975) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · medium confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 2 of 2 located

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Board Of County Commissioners Of The County Of Custer v. Wilshire Oil Company Of Texas”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“It is…the purpose of 15 U.S.C. § 22 to liberalize rather than restrict venue in antitrust actions.” Found — the brief joined separate passages with ellipses (Bluebook R. 5.3). Brief signaled: “(cleaned up)”.

“[I]n determining whether a corporation is transacting business within a district, practical business conceptions are to be considered rather than hair-splitting legal technicalities. It is not a lawyer's contest.” Found word-for-word in the opinion.

12 Belnap v. Steward Health Care System LLC, No. 2:19-cv-00330-DAK, 2020 WL 619402 (D. Utah Feb. 10, 2020) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

We couldn't independently confirm the reporter triple, but we believe this is the matching case based on CourtListener's docket index. Matched docket: “Belnap v. Steward Health Care Systems”.

View matched docket on CourtListener → View case page on GovInfo →

13 Berkshire Bank v. Lloyds Banking Grp. Plc, No. 20-1987-cv, 2022 WL 569819 (2d Cir. Feb. 25, 2022) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · medium confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 1 of 1 located

View matched docket on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“[T]here is no requirement that a plaintiff demonstrate that a defendant 'directed, controlled, and/or supervised the co-conspirator who carried out the overt acts in the forum.” Found word-for-word in the opinion. Brief signaled: “(citation omitted)”.

14 Big Bear Lodging Ass'n v. Snow Summit, Inc., 182 F.3d 1096 (9th Cir. 1999) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · medium confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 1 of 1 located

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Big Bear Lodging Ass'n v. Snow Summit, Inc”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“Competitors, however, may have standing to challenge practices used to enforce a price-fixing conspiracy.” Found word-for-word in the opinion.

15 Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc., 327 U.S. 251 (1946) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

16 Black v. Acme Mkts., Inc., 564 F.2d 681 (5th Cir. 1977) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 2 of 2 located

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “A. L. Black v. Acme Markets, Inc., First National Stores, Inc”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“purchasing activity as well as sales activity” Found word-for-word in the opinion.

“the substantiality of the business transacted is to be judged from the point of view of the average businessman and not in proportion to the sales or revenues of the defendant[.]” Found word-for-word in the opinion.

17 Blue Shield of Va. v. McCready, 457 U.S. 465 (1982) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 1 of 1 located

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Blue Shield of Va. v. McCready”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“The availability of the § 4 remedy to some person who claims its benefit is not a question of the specific intent of the conspirators.” Found word-for-word in the opinion.

18 Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc., 429 U.S. 477 (1977) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 1 of 1 located

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“injury of the type the antitrust laws were intended to prevent and that flows from that which makes defendants' acts unlawful. The injury should reflect the anticompetitive effect either of the violation or of anticompetitive acts made possible by the violation.” Found word-for-word in the opinion.

19 Budde v. Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc., 511 F.2d 1033 (10th Cir. 1975) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 1 of 1 located

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “James Allen Budde v. Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc., D/B/A Kentron Hawaii, Ltd”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“When a defendant moves to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, either party should be allowed discovery on the factual issues raised by that motion.” Found word-for-word in the opinion.

20 Budicak, Inc. v. Lansing Trade Grp., LLC, No. 2:19-CV-2449-JAR-ADM, 2020 WL 758801 (D. Kan. Feb. 14, 2020) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

We couldn't independently confirm the reporter triple, but we believe this is the matching case based on CourtListener's docket index. Matched docket: “Budicak Inc. v. Lansing Trade Group, LLC”.

View matched docket on CourtListener → View case page on GovInfo →

21 Burnett v. Nat'l Ass'n of Realtors, No. 4:19-cv-00332-SRB, 2022 WL 17741708 (W.D. Mo. Dec. 16, 2022) flagged

Case exists as cited?

Pass · medium confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

1 of 2 located

Why we flagged this

• At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.

How we matched this

We couldn't independently confirm the reporter triple, but we believe this is the matching case based on CourtListener's docket index.

View matched docket on CourtListener → View opinion on GovInfo →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“cannot be held liable for their conduct of their associated brokers” The brief's quote matches 97% of the cited opinion, but in separate passages — not as one continuous quote. This typically means the brief either paraphrased inside the quotation marks (Bluebook Rule 5.2 requires brackets for any substitution) or silently omitted intervening text (Bluebook Rule 5.3 requires “. . .” for omissions). Compare the brief's quotation against the cited opinion.

What diverges

brief: …cannot be held liable for their conduct of their associated b…

opinion: …cannot be held liable for the conduct of their associated b…

“encouraged or directed compliance” Found word-for-word in the opinion.

22 Celtig, LLC v. Patey, 347 F. Supp. 3d 976 (D. Utah 2018) flagged

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

1 of 2 located

Why we flagged this

• At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Celtig, LLC v. Patey”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“a threshold showing that a conspiracy existed,” This quote does not appear in the cited opinion's text, but may be a canonical restatement of the opinion — the language appears in another opinion this brief cites.

“that the defendants participated therein.” Not found in the cited opinion. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.

23 Champagne Metals v. Ken-Mac Metals, Inc., 458 F.3d 1073 (10th Cir. 2006) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · medium confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 1 of 1 located

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Champagne Metals v. Ken-Mac Metals, Inc”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“it is certainly economically rational for a group of established firms to attempt to keep an aggressive competitor out of the market, whether they are doing so to protect profits or simply to guard market share.” Found word-for-word in the opinion.

24 City of Chanute v. Williams Natural Gas Co., 955 F.2d 641 (10th Cir. 1992) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · medium confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “City of Chanute v. Williams Natural Gas Co”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

25 City of Pontiac Police & Fire Retirement System v. BNP Paribas Securities Corp., 92 F.4th 381 (2d Cir. 2024) Also appears within the block quote of Particular Presents, Inc. v. Clear Channel Commc'ns, Inc. clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · medium confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

View opinion on GovInfo →

26 Clinton v. Sec. Benefit Life Ins. Co., 63 F.4th 1264 (10th Cir. 2023) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 1 of 1 located

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Clinton v. Security Benefit Life”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“low bar,” Found word-for-word in the opinion. Brief signaled: “(citation omitted)”.

27 Cohlmia v. St. John Med. Ctr., 693 F.3d 1269 (10th Cir. 2012) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 1 of 1 located

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Cohlmia, Jr. v. St. John Medical Center, Inc”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“affected the prices, quantity or quality of goods or services, not just [the plaintiff's] own welfare.” Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible. Brief signaled: “(citation omitted)”.

28 Cont'l Ore Co. v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp., 370 U.S. 690 (1962) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Continental Ore Co. v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

29 CounselNow, LLC v. Deluxe Small Bus. Sales Inc., 430 F. Supp. 3d 1247 (D. Utah 2019) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · medium confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 1 of 1 located

How we matched this

The brief's reporter triple is independently confirmed by leagle.com's volume index, and CourtListener's docket index identifies the same case.

View matched docket on CourtListener → View opinion on GovInfo →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“substantially certain that its actions would interfere with CounselNow's prospective business relations and that those prospective business relations actually existed.” Found word-for-word in the opinion.

30 CVB, Inc. v. Corsicana Mattress Co., 604 F. Supp. 3d 1264 (D. Utah 2022) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · medium confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The brief's reporter triple is independently confirmed by leagle.com's volume index, and CourtListener's docket index identifies the same case. Matched docket: “CVB Inc v. Corsicana Mattress”.

View matched docket on CourtListener → View case page on GovInfo →

31 DAT Sols., LLC v. Convoy, Inc., No. 3:22-cv-00088-IM, 2023 WL 3058057 (D. Or. Apr. 24, 2023) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

We couldn't independently confirm the reporter triple, but we believe this is the matching case based on CourtListener's docket index. Matched docket: “DAT Solutions, LLC v. Convoy, Inc”.

View matched docket on CourtListener → View case page on GovInfo →

32 E. States Retail Lumber Dealers' Ass'n v. United States, 234 U.S. 600 (1914) flagged

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

4 of 5 located

Why we flagged this

• At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Eastern States Retail Lumber Dealers' Ass'n v. United States”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“natural consequence” Found word-for-word in the opinion.

“natural consequence” Found word-for-word in the opinion.

“concerted action” Found word-for-word in the opinion.

“there [wa]s no agreement among the retailers to refrain from dealing with listed wholesalers[] nor [wa]s there any penalty annexed for the failure to do so[.]” The brief's quote matches 87% of the cited opinion, but in separate passages — not as one continuous quote. This typically means the brief either paraphrased inside the quotation marks (Bluebook Rule 5.2 requires brackets for any substitution) or silently omitted intervening text (Bluebook Rule 5.3 requires “. . .” for omissions). Compare the brief's quotation against the cited opinion.

What diverges

brief: …nalty annexed for the failure to do so…

opinion: …nalty annexed for the failure so to do, but he is blind in…

“had, and was intended to have, the natural effect of causing such retailers to withhold their patronage from the concern listed.” Found word-for-word in the opinion.

33 Eastman Kodak Co. of N.Y. v. S. Photo Materials Co., 273 U.S. 359 (1927) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 1 of 1 located

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“in the ordinary and usual sense, it 'transacts business' [in that judicial district] of any substantial character.” Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.

34 Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc., 504 U.S. 451 (1992) flagged

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

0 of 1 located

Why we flagged this

• At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“[O]ne of the evils proscribed by the antitrust laws is the creation === Footnotes === NAR misleadingly cites Llacua for the proposition that trade association membership does not, without more, establish a Sherman Act conspiracy. (NAR Mem. at 22.) In Llacua, the plaintiffs lacked direct evidence of agreement among the defendants (because the trade association did not have a rule mandating the challenged conduct) and were attempting to infer the existence of that agreement through circumstantial evidence, including the defendants' membership in the association. Homie is not alleging that Defendants must have agreed to some other agreement because they were NAR members; instead, Homie is alleging that Defendants did agree to the specific NAR ERPs at issue here. Those allegations directly evidence concerted action. See Llacua, 930 F.3d at 1180 & n.30. of entry barriers to potential competitors….” Not found in the cited opinion. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.

35 Eldridge v. Johndrow, 345 P.3d 553 (Utah 2015) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Eldridge v. Johndrow”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

36 First Am. Title Ins. Co. v. Nw. Title Ins. Agency, LLC, No. 2:15-cv-00229-DN, 2016 WL 7350319 (D. Utah Dec. 19, 2016) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · medium confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 1 of 1 located

How we matched this

We couldn't independently confirm the reporter triple, but we believe this is the matching case based on CourtListener's docket index.

View matched docket on CourtListener → View opinion on GovInfo →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“Michael Smith's breach of his fiduciary duty is the predicate improper means which enabled tortious interference by other agents of Northwest.” Found word-for-word in the opinion.

37 FTC v. Procter & Gamble Co., 386 U.S. 568 (1967) flagged

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

0 of 1 located

Why we flagged this

• At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Federal Trade Commission v. Procter & Gamble Co”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“may substantially reduce the competitive structure of the industry by raising entry barriers and dissuading the smaller firms from aggressively competing” The brief's quote matches 100% of the cited opinion, but in separate passages — not as one continuous quote. This typically means the brief either paraphrased inside the quotation marks (Bluebook Rule 5.2 requires brackets for any substitution) or silently omitted intervening text (Bluebook Rule 5.3 requires “. . .” for omissions). Compare the brief's quotation against the cited opinion.

What diverges

brief: …by raising entry barriers and dissuading the smaller firms f…

opinion: …by raising entry barriers and by dissuading the smaller firms f…

38 GDHI Marketing LLC v. Antsel Marketing LLC, 416 F. Supp. 3d 1189 (D. Colo. 2019) flagged

Case exists as cited?

Pass · medium confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

0 of 1 located

Why we flagged this

• At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.

How we matched this

The brief's reporter triple is independently confirmed by leagle.com's volume index, and CourtListener's docket index identifies the same case.

View matched docket on CourtListener → View opinion on GovInfo →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“[i]n the context of a continuing conspiracy to violate the antitrust laws…each time a plaintiff is === Footnotes === LLC, 416 F. Supp. 3d 1189, 1204 (D. Colo. 2019), the court found the plaintiff's allegations of a relevant market and power within that market to be insufficient, but Defendants here have not challenged Homie's pleading of those elements. Defendants also cite Association of Surgical Assistants, 2023 WL 7277313, at *2, but neither the cited portion of that opinion (nor any other) relates to the pleading of causation in an antitrust case. injured by an act of the defendants a cause of action accrues to him to recover the damages caused by that act and that, as to those damages, the statute of limitations runs from the commission of the act.” Not found in the cited opinion. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.

39 Glover By & Through Dyson v. Boy Scouts of America, 923 P.2d 1383 (Utah 1996) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Glover Ex Rel. Dyson v. Boy Scouts of America”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

40 Go-Video, Inc. v. Akai Elec. Co., 885 F.2d 1406 (9th Cir. 1989) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Go-Video, Inc. v. Akai Electric Company, Ltd., and Matsushita Electric Industrial Company, Ltd”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

41 Hammes v. AAMCO Transmissions, Inc., 33 F.3d 774 (7th Cir. 1994) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · medium confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 2 of 2 located

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Hammes v. Aamco Transmissions, Incorporated”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“wanted to compete by underselling the other [competitors]” Found word-for-word in the opinion.

“to prevent it from, or punish it for, doing this” Found word-for-word in the opinion.

42 Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe Mach. Corp., 392 U.S. 481 (1968) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

43 Hart v. Salois, === Footnotes === No. 14-4053, 2015 WL 1020369 (10th Cir. Mar. 10, 2015) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

We couldn't independently confirm the reporter triple, but we believe this is the matching case based on CourtListener's docket index. Matched docket: “Hart v. Salois”.

View matched docket on CourtListener →

44 In re Platinum & Palladium Antitrust Litigation, 449 F. Supp. 3d 290 (S.D.N.Y. 2020) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · medium confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The brief's reporter triple is independently confirmed by leagle.com's volume index, and CourtListener's docket index identifies the same case.

View matched docket on CourtListener →

45 In re Travel Agent Commission Antitrust Litigation, 583 F.3d 896 (6th Cir. 2009) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · medium confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 1 of 1 located

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Tam Travel, Inc. v. Delta Airlines, Inc. (In Re Travel Agent Commission Antitrust Litigation)”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“rippling effect” Found word-for-word in the opinion.

46 Instructional Sys. Dev. Corp. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 817 F.2d 639 (10th Cir. 1987) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Instructional Systems Development Corporation v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company and Doron Precision Systems, Inc”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

47 Int'l Longshore & Warehouse Union v. ICTSI Or., Inc., 863 F.3d 1178 (9th Cir. 2017) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 1 of 1 located

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “International Longshore & Warehouse Union v. ICTSI Oregon, Inc”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“by raising prices to supra-competitive levels” Found word-for-word in the opinion.

48 Interstate Cir. v. United States, 306 U.S. 208 (1939) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 1 of 1 located

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United States”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“necessary consequence” Found word-for-word in the opinion.

49 J. Allen Ramey, M.D., Inc. v. Pacific Foundation For Medical Care, 999 F. Supp. 1355 (S.D. Cal. 1998) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “J. Allen Ramey, M.D., Inc. v. Pacific Foundation for Medical Care”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

50 Jefferson Parish Hosp. Dist. No. 2 v. Hyde, 466 U.S. 2 (1984) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 1 of 1 located

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. Hyde”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“could either harm existing competitors or create barriers to entry of new competitors…” Found word-for-word in the opinion.

51 Jicarilla Apache Tribe v. Supron Energy Corp., 728 F.2d 1555 (10th Cir. 1984) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · medium confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Jicarilla Apache Tribe v. Supron Energy Corp”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

52 JTC Petroleum Co. v. Piasa Motor Fuels, Inc., 190 F.3d 775 (7th Cir. 1999) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 1 of 1 located

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Jtc Petroleum Company v. Piasa Motor Fuels, Inc”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“[a]conspiracy of a firm's competitors to [fix prices] could only help the firm, by providing an umbrella under which it could sell a large quantity at a supracompetitive price generating supracompetitive profits just by setting price in between the conspirators' price and the lower, competitive price that would prevail in the absence of the conspiracy.” Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.

53 L-3 Commc'ns Corp. v. Jaxon Eng'g & Maint., Inc., 863 F. Supp. 2d 1066 (D. Colo. 2012) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 1 of 1 located

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “L-3 Communications Corp. v. Jaxon Engineering & Maintenance, Inc”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“[T]he injury to the plaintiff and the injury to competition must be one and the same.” Found word-for-word in the opinion.

54 Leigh Furniture & Carpet Co. v. Isom, 657 P.2d 293 (Utah 1982) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 2 of 2 located

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Leigh Furniture and Carpet Co. v. Isom”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“Driving away an individual's existing or potential customers is the archetypical injury this cause of action was devised to remedy.” Found word-for-word in the opinion.

“detriment of [the store owner's] ability to attract and retain customers,” Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.

55 Licari v. Best Western International, Inc., No. 2:11-cv-603, 2013 WL 3716523 (D. Utah July 12, 2013) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · medium confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

We couldn't independently confirm the reporter triple, but we believe this is the matching case based on CourtListener's docket index.

View matched docket on CourtListener → View opinion on GovInfo →

56 Llacua v. W. Range Ass'n, 930 F.3d 1161 (10th Cir. 2019) Also appears within the block quote of Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc. clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 1 of 1 located

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Llacua v. Western Range Association”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“Direct evidence of a § 1 agreement may take the form of a written contract or agreement, such as association rules, or admissions of an agreement.” Found word-for-word in the opinion.

57 Mallory v. Brigham Young University, 2012 UT App 242 clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Mallory v. Brigham Young University”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

58 Matsushita Electrical Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574 (1986) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 1 of 1 located

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“other conduct” Found word-for-word in the opinion.

59 Maui Jim, Inc. v. SmartBuy Guru Enterprises, 386 F. Supp. 3d 926 (N.D. Ill. 2019) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Maui Jim, Inc. v. Smartbuy Guru Enters”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

60 Melea, Ltd. v. Jawer, SA, 511 F.3d 1060 (10th Cir. 2007) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 1 of 1 located

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Melea, Ltd. v. Jawer Sa”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“must offer more than 'bare allegations' that a conspiracy existed, and must allege facts that would support a prima facie showing of a conspiracy.” Found word-for-word in the opinion.

61 Moehrl v. Nat'l Ass'n of Realtors, 492 F. Supp. 3d 768 (N.D. Ill. 2020) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · medium confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The brief's reporter triple is independently confirmed by leagle.com's volume index, and CourtListener's docket index identifies the same case. Matched docket: “Moehrl v. The National Association of Realtors”.

View matched docket on CourtListener → View case page on GovInfo →

62 Monument Builders of Greater Kansas City, Inc., v. Am. Cemetery Ass'n, No. 84-2469-S, 1990 WL 269872 (D. Kan. Oct. 18, 1990) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · medium confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

We couldn't independently confirm the reporter triple, but we believe this is the matching case based on CourtListener's docket index.

View matched docket on CourtListener →

63 Mumford v. ITT Com. Fin. Corp., 858 P.2d 1041 (Utah Ct. App. 1993) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Mumford v. ITT Commercial Finance Corp”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

64 Bd. v. Alabama Power Co., 934 F.2d 1493 (11th Cir. 1991) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · medium confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 1 of 1 located

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Municipal Utilities Bd. of Albertville v. Alabama Power Co”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“Although the defendants' allegedly anticompetitive conduct would also injure consumers, such conduct would also directly injure [the plaintiffs] as competitors.” Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.

65 Nat'l Soc'y of Pro. Eng'rs v. United States, 435 U.S. 679 (1973) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 1 of 1 located

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “National Society of Professional Engineers v. United States”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“substantially deprive[] the customer of the ability to utilize and compare prices in selecting” Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible. Brief signaled: “(cleaned up)”.

66 Particular Presents, Inc. v. Clear Channel Commc'ns, Inc., 311 F. Supp. 2d 1048 (D. Colo. 2004) flagged

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

0 of 1 located

Why we flagged this

• At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Nobody in Particular Presents, Inc. v. Clear Channel Communications, Inc”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“When the parent controls, directs, or encourages the subsidiary's anticompetitive conduct, the parent engages in sufficient independent conduct to be === Footnotes === Keller Williams relies heavily on an out-of-circuit case, City of Pontiac Police & Fire Retirement System v. BNP Paribas Securities Corp., 92 F.4th 381 (2d Cir. 2024), but that case is distinguishable because the plaintiff sought to infer the existence of an alleged antitrust conspiracy from circumstantial evidence and parallel conduct among the defendants rather than adducing direct evidence in the form of trade association rules, as Homie does. Pontiac relates to the inference of an agreement, not to the liability of a conspirator for the foreseeable results of an agreement once proven. held directly liable as a single enterprise with the subsidiary under the Sherman Act” Not found in the cited opinion. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.

67 Orval Sheppard Real Estate Co. v. Valinda Freed & Associates, Inc., 608 F. Supp. 354 (M.D. Ala. 1985) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Orval Sheppard Real Estate Co. v. Valinda Freed & Associates, Inc”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

68 Park v. El Paso Board of Realtors, 764 F.2d 1053 (5th Cir. 1985) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 1 of 1 located

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “John R. (Bob) Park D/B/A Action Real Estate, Cross v. El Paso Board of Realtors, and E. Dempsey Gunaca, Defendants-Cross”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“price fixing ordinarily helps these competitors by allowing them to capture a larger share of the market than they would if the prevailing price were lower.” Found word-for-word in the opinion.

69 Penne v. Greater Minneapolis Area Bd. of Realtors, 604 F.2d 1143 (8th Cir. 1979) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 1 of 1 located

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Ca 79-3319 John Penne and Penne Realty, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. The Greater Minneapolis Area Board of Realtors”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“facilitate[d]” Found word-for-word in the opinion.

70 Phone Directories Co. v. Contel Corp., 786 F. Supp. 930 (D. Utah 1992) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Phone Directories Co., Inc. v. Contel Corp”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

71 Pinkerton v. United States, 328 U.S. 640 (1946) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 1 of 1 located

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Pinkerton v. United States”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“reasonably foresee[able] as a necessary or natural consequence of the unlawful agreement” Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.

72 Port Dock & Stone Corp. v. Oldcastle Northeast, Inc., 507 F.3d 117 (2d Cir. 2007) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Port Dock & Stone Corp. v. Oldcastle Northeast, Inc”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

73 Pulse Network, LLC v. Visa, Inc., 30 F.4th 480 (5th Cir. 2022) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Pulse Network v. Visa”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

74 Robertson v. Sea Pines Real Est. Cos., Inc., 679 F.3d 278 (4th Cir. 2012) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · medium confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Robertson v. Sea Pines Real Estate Companies, Inc”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

75 Rockbit Industries U.S.A., Inc. v. Baker Hughes, Inc., 802 F. Supp. 1544 (S.D. Tex. 1991) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Rockbit Industries U.S.A., Inc. v. Baker Hughes, Inc”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

76 Ryan v. Microsoft Corp., 147 F. Supp. 3d 868 (N.D. Cal. 2015) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Ryan v. Microsoft Corp”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

77 SAS of Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Puerto Rico Tel. Co., 48 F.3d 39 (1st Cir. 1995) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Sas of Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Puerto Rico Telephone Company”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

78 Schwab Short-Term Bond Market Fund v. Lloyds Banking Group PLC, 22 F.4th 103 (2d Cir. 2021) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · medium confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

View opinion on GovInfo →

79 SCO Grp., Inc. v. Int'l Bus. Machs. Corp., 879 F.3d 1062 (10th Cir. 2018) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 2 of 2 located

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “SCO Group, Inc. v. International Business MacHines Corp”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“repeatedly interrupted sales activities, caused [plaintiff]'s customers to comment and complain, and more than once caused a customer to leave the store.” Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.

“The improper-means requirement 'is satisfied where the means used to interfere with a party's economic relations are contrary to law, such as violations of statutes, regulations, or recognized common-law rules.'” Found word-for-word in the opinion.

80 Seay v. Oklahoma Board of Dentistry, No. CIV-17-682-D, 2021 WL 1394478 (W.D. Okla. Apr. 12, 2021) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

We couldn't independently confirm the reporter triple, but we believe this is the matching case based on CourtListener's docket index. Matched docket: “Seay v. Oklahoma Board of Dentistry”.

View matched docket on CourtListener → View case page on GovInfo →

81 Sharp v. United Airlines, Inc., 967 F.2d 404 (10th Cir. 1992) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Sharp v. United Airlines, Inc”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

82 Sitzer v. Nat'l Ass'n of Realtors, 420 F. Supp. 3d 903 (W.D. Mo. 2019) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · medium confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The brief's reporter triple is independently confirmed by leagle.com's volume index, and CourtListener's docket index identifies the same case.

View matched docket on CourtListener → View opinion on GovInfo →

83 Sizova v. Nat'l Inst. of Standards & Tech., 282 F.3d 1320 (10th Cir. 2002) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 1 of 1 located

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Sizova v. National Institute of Standards & Technology”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“Prejudice is present where pertinent facts bearing on the question of jurisdiction are controverted or where a more satisfactory showing of the facts is necessary.” Found — the brief signaled the modification with a Bluebook parenthetical, so we used a relaxed match. Brief signaled: “(cleaned up)”.

84 Sports Racing Servs., Inc. v. Sports Car Club of Am., Inc., 131 F.3d 874 (10th Cir. 1997) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 2 of 2 located

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Sports Racing Services, Inc. v. Sports Car Club of America, Inc”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“To maintain standing to bring an antitrust claim under § 4 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 15, a plaintiff must show (1) an 'antitrust injury;' and (2) a direct causal connection between that injury and a defendant's violation of the antitrust laws.” Found — the brief joined separate passages from the opinion.

“[T]he standing analysis must take into account the type of antitrust claim being asserted.” Found word-for-word in the opinion.

85 St. Benedict's Development Co. v. St. Benedict's Hospital, 811 P.2d 194 (Utah 1991) flagged

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

0 of 1 located

Why we flagged this

• At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “St. Benedict's Development Co. v. St. Benedict's Hospital”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“There is no allegation in the complaint that any existing sublease…was breached or that performance under any of those subleases was in any way impaired by defendants' actions.” The brief's quote matches 98% of the cited opinion, but in separate passages — not as one continuous quote. This typically means the brief either paraphrased inside the quotation marks (Bluebook Rule 5.2 requires brackets for any substitution) or silently omitted intervening text (Bluebook Rule 5.3 requires “. . .” for omissions). Compare the brief's quotation against the cited opinion.

What diverges

brief: …ublease...was breached or that performance under any of thos…

opinion: …ublease...was breached or that the performance under any of thos…

86 Stamatakis Indus., Inc. v. King, 965 F.2d 469 (7th Cir. 1992) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 1 of 1 located

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Stamatakis Industries, Inc., and Premier Engraving, Inc., Cross-Appellees v. Frederick King and King Graphics, Inc., Cross-Appellants”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“The [Supreme Court's] antitrust injury doctrine…requires every plaintiff to show that its loss comes from acts that reduce output or raise prices to consumers.” Found in the opinion. Brief signaled: “(cleaned up)”.

87 Stiles v. Walmart, Inc., 639 F. Supp. 3d 1029 (E.D. Cal. 2022) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · medium confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The brief's reporter triple is independently confirmed by leagle.com's volume index, and CourtListener's docket index identifies the same case. Matched docket: “Stiles v. Walmart, Inc”.

View matched docket on CourtListener → View case page on GovInfo →

88 Triesault v. Greater Salt Lake Business District, P.3d 781, 2005 UT App 489 (Utah Ct. App. 2005) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Triesault v. Greater Salt Lake Business District”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

89 TruGreen Companies, L.L.C. v. Mower Brothers, Inc., 199 P.3d 929, 2008 UT 81 (Utah 2008) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “TruGreen Companies, L.L.C. v. Mower Bros., Inc”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

90 United States v. Scophony Corp. of Am., 333 U.S. 795 (1948) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 1 of 1 located

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “United States v. Scophony Corp. of America”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“practical, everyday business or commercial concept of doing or carrying on business of any substantial character….” Found word-for-word in the opinion.

91 US Magnesium, LLC v. ATI Titanium LLC, No. 2:17-cv-923-DB, 2019 WL 1755427 (D. Utah Apr. 19, 2019) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · medium confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

We couldn't independently confirm the reporter triple, but we believe this is the matching case based on CourtListener's docket index. Matched docket: “US Magnesium v. ATI Titanium”.

View matched docket on CourtListener → View case page on GovInfo →

92 Van Ornum v. Am. Med. Ass'n, No. 2:14-cv-921-RJS-EJF, 2017 WL 9481020 (D. Utah Mar. 16, 2017) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · low confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

We couldn't independently confirm the reporter triple, but we believe this is the matching case based on CourtListener's docket index.

View matched docket on CourtListener → View opinion on GovInfo →

93 Van Ornum v. Am. Med. Ass'n, No. 2:14-cv-921-RJS-EJF, 2017 WL 9481020, at *6 (D. Utah Mar. 16, 2017), report and recommendation adopted, No. 2:14-cv-00921-RJS-EJF, 2017 WL 4339653 (D. Utah Sept. 29, 2017) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · low confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

We couldn't independently confirm the reporter triple, but we believe this is the matching case based on CourtListener's docket index.

View matched docket on CourtListener → View opinion on GovInfo →

94 Vincent v. Utah Plastic Surgery Society, No. 2:12-CV-1048 TS, 2013 WL 4782354 (D. Utah Sept. 5, 2013) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · medium confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

We couldn't independently confirm the reporter triple, but we believe this is the matching case based on CourtListener's docket index.

View matched docket on CourtListener → View opinion on GovInfo →

95 Volvo N. Am. Corp. v. Men's Int'l Prof. Tennis Council, 857 F.2d 55 (2d Cir. 1988) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Volvo North America Corp. v. Men's International Professional Tennis Council”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

96 World of Sleep, Inc. v. La-Z-Boy Chair Co., 756 F.2d 1467 (10th Cir. 1985) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · medium confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “World Of Sleep, Inc. v. La-Z-Boy Chair Company”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

97 Yellow Pages Cost Consultants, Inc. v. GTE Directories, 951 F.2d 1158 (9th Cir. 1991) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · medium confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Yellow Pages Cost Consultants, Inc. v. Gte Directories Corporation”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

98 Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Rsch., Inc., 395 U.S. 100 (1969) flagged

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

0 of 1 located

Why we flagged this

• At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“reasonable inference from the proof of defendants' wrongful acts and their tendency to injure === Footnotes === Dispositively, Keller Williams admits that allegations that a "franchisor directed the franchisees [sic] actions" would suffice to impute liability to Keller Williams. (Keller Williams Mem. at 17) (emphasis in the original). HSA admits that allegations that a franchisor controls the actions of the franchisee with respect to the conduct at issue in the case would suffice. (HSA Mem. at 18-19.) NAR would require the pleading of facts "sufficient to show the Corporate Defendants somehow controlled or directed their [Utah affiliates'] actions." (NAR Mem. at 21.) These Defendants thus concede that Homie's allegations suffice. plaintiffs' business[.]” Not found in the cited opinion. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.

99 Illinois Tool Works, Inc. v. Indep. Ink, Inc., 547 U.S. 28 (2006) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

100 Copperweld Corp. v. Indep. Tube Corp., 467 U.S. 752, 773-74 (1984) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

101 Thompson v. Metro. Multi-List, Inc., 934 F.2d 1566, 1572 (11th Cir. 1991) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · medium confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Thompson v. Metropolitan Multi-List, Inc”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

102 Telecor Commc'ns, Inc. v. Sw. Bell Tel. Co., 305 F.3d 1124, 1127-29 (10th Cir. 2002) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Telecor Communications, Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

103 Tal v. Hogan, 453 F.3d 1244, 1253 (10th Cir. 2006) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 1 of 1 located

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Tal v. Hogan”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“Tal, Inc. was not a buyer or seller in the affected market.” Found word-for-word in the opinion.

104 Zenith Radio, 401 U.S. at 338 retrieval gap

Case exists as cited?

Pass · medium confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

No

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · opinion text unavailable

Why we couldn't check the quotes

We couldn't retrieve any opinion text for this citation from our public sources. The case may only be available on a paid service like Westlaw or Lexis. Without the text, we can't check whether the brief's quotes appear in the opinion.

Quotes attributed to this authority

These quotes have not been verified because the opinion text wasn't available.

cause of action accrues and the statute begins to run when a defendant commits an act that injures a plaintiff's business.

Not verified: opinion text unavailable.

105 Seay v. Oklahoma Board of Dentistry, No. CIV-17-682-D, 2021 WL 1394478, at *2 (W.D. Okla. Apr. 12, 2021), aff'd on other grounds, No. 21-6054, 2022 WL 984378, at *5 (10th Cir. Apr. 1, 2022) pacer paywall only

Case exists as cited?

Pass · medium confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

No

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

We couldn't independently confirm the reporter triple, but we believe this is the matching case based on CourtListener's docket index.

View matched docket on CourtListener →

106 Newsome v. Gallacher, 722 F.3d 1257, 1265-66 (10th Cir. 2013) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Newsome v. Gallacher”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

107 Lolavar v. de Santibanes, 430 F.3d 221, 229-30 (4th Cir. 2005) brief quality flagged

Case exists as cited?

Pass · medium confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

Brief-quality observations

• Case name in the brief looks like a typo of the official record.

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Lolavar v. De Santibañes”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

108 McLaughlin v. McPhail, 707 F.2d 800, 807 (4th Cir. 1983) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “McLaughlin v. McPhail”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

109 In re Credit Default Swaps Auctions Litigation, 710 F. Supp. 3d 895, 941 (D.N.M. 2023) brief quality flagged

Case exists as cited?

Not verified

Opinion text retrieved?

No

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

Brief-quality observations

• Brief cites this case at D.N.M., but an exact-name docket exists at S.D.N.Y.. Could be a brief typo or a separate ruling after a venue transfer.

110 15 U.S.C. § 1 clean

Citation exists?

Pass · high confidence

Source text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in source?

Pass· 1 of 1 located

How we matched this

Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).

View text on Cornell Law (LII) →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“[e]very contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States.” Found word-for-word in the source text.

111 15 U.S.C. § 15 clean

Citation exists?

Pass · high confidence

Source text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in source?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).

View text on Cornell Law (LII) →

112 15 U.S.C. § 15b clean

Citation exists?

Pass · high confidence

Source text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in source?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).

View text on Cornell Law (LII) →

113 15 U.S.C. § 22 clean

Citation exists?

Pass · high confidence

Source text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in source?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).

View text on Cornell Law (LII) →

114 28 U.S.C. § 1391 clean

Citation exists?

Pass · high confidence

Source text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in source?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).

View text on Cornell Law (LII) →

115 Utah Code Ann. § 76-10-926 manual verify

Citation exists?

Not verified

Source text retrieved?

Link only

Quotes found in source?

N/A · no quotes to check

Please verify this one manually

We've identified the source URL for this citation, but the host blocks automated tools so we couldn't pull the text to verify the quotes ourselves. The link below opens fine in a browser; click through to manually confirm the section text matches the brief.

View text on state code →

116 Utah Admin. Code r. 162-2f-401a manual verify

Citation exists?

Not verified

Source text retrieved?

No

Quotes found in source?

N/A · source text unavailable

Please verify this one manually

This citation falls outside our automated coverage. Law reviews, treatises, restatements, and legislative packages predating govinfo's collection window don't have a free full-text source we can reliably retrieve. The citation itself looks well-formed; a reviewer with access to HeinOnline, Westlaw, Lexis, or a law library can confirm. This isn't a defect in the citation; it's a coverage gap in our automated sources.

Quotes attributed to this authority

These quotes have not been verified because the source text wasn't retrieved.

uphold [various] fiduciary duties in the course of representing a principal,

Not verified: source text unavailable.

117 § 4 of the Clayton Act clean

Citation exists?

Pass · high confidence

Source text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in source?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).

View text on Cornell Law (LII) →

118 Utah Code Ann. § 76-10 manual verify

Citation exists?

Not verified

Source text retrieved?

Link only

Quotes found in source?

N/A · source text unavailable

Please verify this one manually

We've identified the source URL for this citation, but the host blocks automated tools so we couldn't pull the text to verify the quotes ourselves. The link below opens fine in a browser; click through to manually confirm the section text matches the brief.

View text on state code →

Quotes attributed to this authority

These quotes have not been verified because the source text wasn't retrieved. Use the link above to open the source and compare directly.

guided by interpretations given by the federal courts to comparable federal antitrust statutes….

Not verified: source text unavailable.

120 Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 4(k)(1)(C) clean

Citation exists?

Pass · high confidence

Source text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in source?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).

View text on Cornell Law (LII) →

121 Rule 12 clean

Citation exists?

Pass · high confidence

Source text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in source?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).

View text on Cornell Law (LII) →

122 Section 12 of the Clayton Act clean

Citation exists?

Pass · high confidence

Source text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in source?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).

View text on Cornell Law (LII) →

123 Section 8 of the Clayton Act clean

Citation exists?

Pass · high confidence

Source text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in source?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).

View text on Cornell Law (LII) →