Report
Supreme Court of the United States — Alito, J., dissenting (Nos. 25A1207 / 25A1208)
16 authorities checked
How this report was built
AI inference calls
0
Citations parsed
16
Sources queried
4
Cornell LII, CourtListener, State code databases, govinfo
Source texts retrieved
14
Quotes checked
3
3 matched in source text
Verification runs deterministically against authoritative public databases. Your brief is not sent to OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or any other third-party model.
Click any citation below to see how we verified it, the matched source, and a per-quote breakdown.
§Authorities
|
1 Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, 597 U. S. 215 (2022) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
2 FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, 602 U. S. 367, 375-376 (2024) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
3 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 558 U. S. 183, 190 (2010) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Hollingsworth v. Perry”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
4 Heckler v. Chaney, 470 U. S. 821 (1985) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Heckler v. Chaney”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
5 United States v. United Liquor Corporation, 77 S. Ct. 208, 210 (1956) flagged
Case exists as cited?
Not verified
Opinion text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
Why we flagged this
- This is an in-chambers opinion — a ruling by a single Justice on an emergency application, signaled by the “…, J., in chambers” parenthetical. In-chambers opinions are unevenly indexed in CourtListener and other free sources, and every layer we queried (CourtListener citation, docket, and name search; court adapters; govinfo) missed this one. That is a known coverage gap for single-Justice in-chambers orders, not a sign the citation is wrong — a reviewer can confirm it in a print reporter or a paid service.
6 Indiana State Police Pension Trust v. Chrysler LLC, 556 U. S. 960, 961 (2009) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Indiana State Police Pension Trust v. Chrysler LLC”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
7 Liu v. SEC, 591 U. S. 71, 79-80 (2020) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Liu v. SEC. & Exch. Comm'n”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
8 Wisconsin Gas Co. v. FERC, 758 F. 2d 669, 674 (CADC 1985) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Wisconsin Gas Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“the very existence of [its] business”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
9 Louisiana v. FDA, No. 6-25-cv-1491 (WD La.) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
We couldn't independently confirm the reporter triple, but we believe this is the matching case based on CourtListener's docket index.
View matched docket on CourtListener →
10 Alliance for Hypocritic Medicine v. FDA, No. 2:22-cv-223 (ND Tex.) brief quality flagged
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
Brief-quality observations
- Case name in the brief looks like a typo of the official record.
How we matched this
We couldn't independently confirm the reporter triple, but we believe this is the matching case based on CourtListener's docket index.
View matched docket on CourtListener →
View opinion on GovInfo →
11 La. Rev. Stat. Ann. §40.1061 manual verify
Citation exists?
Not verified
Source text retrieved?
Link only
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
Please verify this one manually
We've identified the source URL for this citation, but the host blocks automated tools so we couldn't pull the text to verify the quotes ourselves. The link below opens fine in a browser; click through to manually confirm the section text matches the brief.
View text on state code →12 N. Y. Exec. Law §837-x clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· medium confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
Matched on the state code's official online publication.
View text on state code →
13 N. Y. Educ. Law §6810.1-a clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· medium confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
Matched on the state code's official online publication.
View text on state code →
15 21 U. S. C. §355-1 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
17 5 U. S. C. §705 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
18 5 U. S. C. §701 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“committed to agency discretion,”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
§Record & filing references (14)
Citations to filings in this case or its record — appendices, docket entries, pleadings. These aren't published authority, so we don't retrieve or verify them. They're listed here so every citation in the brief is accounted for.
La. App. 519
appendix
not verified
La. App. 478
appendix
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- about the safety of mifepristone as currently administered
App. to Application to Stay in FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, O. T. 2022, No. 22A902, p. 113a
appendix
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- to revert to those in place prior to
https://aidaccess.org/en/page/2934664/where-can-
web source
not verified
https://perma.cc/NW2Z-M4B9
web source
not verified
App. to Opposition to Applications for a Stay or Vacatur 462-463
appendix
not verified
La. App. 244
appendix
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- use every lever
- ensure every American has access to . . . medication abortion that has been approved by the FDA for over 20 years,
La. App. 4, 46-50
appendix
not verified
Doc. 51
docket filing
not verified
La. App. 556
appendix
not verified
Application to Stay in No. 25A1207, pp. 35-36
party filing
not verified
Application to Stay in 25A1208, p. 35
party filing
not verified
Doc. 28
docket filing
not verified
Application to Stay in No. 25A1207, p. 35
party filing
not verified