Report
louisiana-v-fda
82 authorities checked
How this report was built
AI inference calls
0
Citations parsed
82
Sources queried
5
Cornell LII, CourtListener, State code databases, Web search republishers, govinfo
Source texts retrieved
70
Quotes checked
125
105 matched in source text
Verification runs deterministically against authoritative public databases. Your brief is not sent to OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or any other third-party model.
Click any citation below to see how we verified it, the matched source, and a per-quote breakdown.
§Authorities
|
1 Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner, 387 U.S. 136 (1967) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“protect[s]the agencies from judicial interference until an administrative decision has been formalized and its effects felt in a concrete way by the challenging parties”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
2 Abbott v. Perez, 585 U.S. 579 (2018) brief quality flagged
Case exists as cited?
Not verified
Opinion text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
Brief-quality observations
- Citation triple resolves in CourtListener to 'Abbott v. Perez', not 'K34-MSUW. v. Perez'.
3 ADT, LLC v. Cap. Connect, Inc., 145 F. Supp. 3d 671 (N.D. Tex. 2015) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “ADT, LLC v. Capital Connect, Inc”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“permit delays when determining the imminence of alleged irreparable harm where delays were 'caused by [plaintiff's] good faith efforts to investigate facts and law.'”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
4 Alfred L. Snapp & Son, Inc. v. Puerto Rico, ex rel., Barez, 458 U.S. 592 (1982) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Alfred L. Snapp & Son, Inc. v. Puerto Rico Ex Rel. Barez”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
5 Ali v. Quarterman, 607 F.3d 1046 (5th Cir. 2010) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Ali v. Quarterman”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“move forward with the case so far as is practicable.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
6 All. for Hippocratic Med. v. FDA, 668 F. Supp. 3d 507 (N.D. Tex. 2023) brief quality flagged
Case exists as cited?
Not verified
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
0 of 1 located
Brief-quality observations
- A case named 'Alliance Hippocratic Medicine v. FDA' exists in CourtListener at 117 F.4th 336, 78 F.4th 210 (ca5, 2023). The brief cites it as 668 F. Supp. 3d 507 — the brief's citation does not match the real instrument.
Why we flagged this
- We couldn't independently verify this citation against our public sources.
- At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.
Quotes attributed to this authority
“sixteen years of delay, dawdle, and dithering,”
Not found in the cited opinion. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.
7 All. for Hippocratic Med. v. FDA, 78 F.4th 210 (5th Cir. 2023) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 17 of 17 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Alliance Hippocratic Medicine v. FDA”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“FDA simply did not tether its [2023] action”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“to the continued existence of the public health emergency”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“defect[ive],”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“considerable evidence shows that FAERS data is insufficient to draw general conclusions about adverse events.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“no direct relationship with [mifepristone] patients and little ability to track events.”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
“residual reporting requirements do not cure this APA violation.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“cannot be used to calculate the incidence of an adverse event,”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“not adequate on their own to establish the safety of … dispensing mifepristone by mail.”
Found — the brief joined separate passages with ellipses (Bluebook R. 5.3).
“supported [FDA's] conclusion that mifepristone would still be safe and effective even with a relaxed in-person dispensing requirement”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
“using the mails for the mailing of a drug for producing abortion is precisely what the Comstock Act prohibits.”
Found — the brief signaled the modification with a Bluebook parenthetical, so we used a relaxed match. Brief signaled: “(citation modified)”.
“only reinforces the natural reading of the text.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“not deny”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“already has drug labels and documentation that comply with the [previous] mifepristone REMS.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“will continue to apply.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“strong[] doubt[s]”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
“no authority.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“[T]he record shows that FDA would have denied any request for an administrative stay.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
8 All. for Hippocratic Med. v. FDA, No. 23-10362, 2023 WL 2913725 (5th Cir. Apr. 12, 2023) flagged
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
5 of 6 located
Why we flagged this
- At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.
How we matched this
We couldn't independently confirm the reporter triple, but we believe this is the matching case based on CourtListener's docket index. Matched docket: “Alliance Hippocratic Medicine v. FDA”.
View matched docket on CourtListener →
View case page on GovInfo →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“deeply troubling.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“cold storage.”
Not found in the cited opinion. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.
“well-established that where an agency fails to follow its own regulations, exhaustion may not be required.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“FDA's repeated failure to follow its own regulations,”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“expressly reaffirmed its commitment to mail-order abortion drugs”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“nevertheless undermines applicants' showing on the final three Nken factors.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
9 AMID, Inc., v. Medic Alert Found. U.S., 241 F. Supp. 3d 788 (S.D. Tex. 2017) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “AMID, Inc. v. Medic Alert Foundation United States, Inc”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
10 Ass'n of Data Processing Serv. Orgs., Inc. v. Camp, 397 U.S. 150 (1970) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 5 of 5 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. Camp”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“That interest, at times, may reflect aesthetic, conservational, and recreational as well as economic values.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion. Brief signaled: “(citation modified)”.
“[t]here is no presumption against judicial review and in favor of administrative absolutism unless that purpose is fairly discernible in the statutory scheme.”
Found — the brief signaled the modification with a Bluebook parenthetical, so we used a relaxed match. Brief signaled: “(citation omitted)”.
“no explicit statutory provision”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“sought to preclude judicial review of administrative rulings”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“as to the legitimate scope of activities available”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
11 Benisek v. Lamone, 585 U.S. 155 (2018) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Besinek v. Lamone”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
12 Bennett v. Spear, 520 U.S. 154 (1997) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Bennett v. Spear”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“to ensure that the [FDCA] not be implemented haphazardly,”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
13 Bost v. Ill. State Bd. of Elections, No. 24-568, 2026 WL 96707 (U.S. Jan. 14, 2026) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 5 of 5 located
How we matched this
We couldn't independently confirm the reporter triple, but we believe this is the matching case based on CourtListener's docket index. Matched docket: “Bost v. Illinois Bd. of Elections”.
View matched docket on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“Pocketbook harm is a traditional Article III injury.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion. Brief signaled: “(citation omitted)”.
“Like the farmers in Monsanto,”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“will 'reasonably incur costs to mitigate or avoid' the 'substantial risk' of harm caused by the challenged statute.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“has spent, and will spend, money, time, and resources”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“expenditures mitigate a substantial risk of harm, [the congressman] has pleaded Article III injury.”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
14 Bours v. United States, 229 F. 960 (7th Cir. 1915) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Bours v. United States”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“indicates a national policy of discountenancing abortion as inimical to the national life.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
15 Chelius v. Becerra, No. CV 17-00493 JAO-RT, 2023 WL 5041616 (D. Haw. Aug. 8, 2023) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
We couldn't independently confirm the reporter triple, but we believe this is the matching case based on CourtListener's docket index. Matched docket: “Chelius v. Wright”.
View matched docket on CourtListener →
View case page on GovInfo →
16 Clapper v. Amnesty Int'l USA, 568 U.S. 398 (2013) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 4 of 4 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Clapper v. Amnesty International USA”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“reasonably incur[s]costs to mitigate or avoid”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
“'substantial risk'”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“certainly impending,”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“substantial risk”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
17 Community Television of Utah, LLC v. Aereo, Inc., 997 F. Supp. 2d 1191 (D. Utah 2014) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Community Television of Utah, LLC v. Aereo, Inc”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
18 Contender Farms, L.L.P. v. U.S. Dep't of Agric., 779 F.3d 258 (5th Cir. 2015) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Contender Farms, L.L.P. v. United States Department of Agriculture”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“is in fact an object of a regulation is a flexible inquiry rooted in common sense.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
19 Czyzewski v. Jevic Holding Corp., 580 U.S. 451 (2017) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Czyzewski v. Jevic Holding Corp”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“[f]or standing purposes, a loss of even a small amount of money is ordinarily an 'injury.'”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
20 Darby v. Cisneros, 509 U.S. 137 (1993) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 2 of 2 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Darby v. Cisneros”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“provides that the [agency] action ... is inoperative”
Found in the opinion.
21 Dep't of Com. v. New York, 588 U.S. 752 (2019) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Department of Commerce v. New York”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“Article III requires no more than de facto causality.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion. Brief signaled: “(citation omitted)”.
22 Dep't of Homeland Sec. v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal., 591 U.S. 1 (2020) brief quality flagged
Case exists as cited?
Not verified
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
Brief-quality observations
- A case named 'Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of Univ. of Cal.' exists in CourtListener at 140 S. Ct. 1891, 207 L. Ed. 2d 353 (scotus, 2020). The brief cites it as 591 U.S. 1 — the brief's citation does not match the real instrument.
23 Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC v. EPA, 606 U.S. 100 (2025) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 6 of 6 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC v. EPA”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“the object”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“seek to indirectly target”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“through a conduit.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“harder for soda manufacturers to use sugar.”
This quote does not appear in the cited opinion's text, but may be a canonical restatement of the opinion — the language appears in another opinion this brief cites.
“targets.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“directly regulated part[y],”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
24 Energy Future Coal. v. EPA, 793 F.3d 141 (D.C. Cir. 2015) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Energy Future Coalition v. Environmental Protection Agency”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
25 FCC v. NextWave Pers. Commc'ns Inc., 537 U.S. 293 (2003) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Federal Communications Commission v. Nextwave Personal Communications Inc”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“otherwise not in accordance with law”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
26 Larson v. Valente, 456 U.S. 228 (1982) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Larson v. Valente”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
27 Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc., 572 U.S. 118 (2014) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“lenient approach”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
28 Louisiana v. EEOC, 705 F. Supp. 3d 643 (W.D. La. 2024) pacer paywall only
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· opinion text unavailable
How we matched this
The brief's reporter triple is independently confirmed by leagle.com's volume index, and CourtListener's docket index identifies the same case.
Why we couldn't check the quotes
We couldn't retrieve any opinion text for this citation from our public sources. The case may only be available on a paid service like Westlaw or Lexis. Without the text, we can't check whether the brief's quotes appear in the opinion.
View matched docket on CourtListener →Quotes attributed to this authority
These quotes have not been verified because the opinion text wasn't available. Use the docket link above to locate the cited ruling and compare directly.
have unambiguously expressed their opposition to purely elective abortions by passing laws prohibiting the same,
Not verified: opinion text unavailable.
principles of federalism
Not verified: opinion text unavailable.
Because the principles of federalism afford the states a sovereign interest in creating and enforcing their own laws and public policy,
Not verified: opinion text unavailable.
clearly ha[s] Article III standing to challenge
Not verified: opinion text unavailable.
sovereign interest in creating ... [its] own laws and public policy
Not verified: opinion text unavailable.
[f]or the same reasons
Not verified: opinion text unavailable.
public interest
Not verified: opinion text unavailable.
protect the right to life of every unborn child from conception by prohibiting abortion.
Not verified: opinion text unavailable.
29 Louisiana v. EEOC, 784 F. Supp. 3d 886 (W.D. La. 2025) retrieval gap
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· opinion text unavailable
Why we couldn't check the quotes
We couldn't retrieve any opinion text for this citation from our public sources. The case may only be available on a paid service like Westlaw or Lexis. Without the text, we can't check whether the brief's quotes appear in the opinion.
Quotes attributed to this authority
These quotes have not been verified because the opinion text wasn't available.
status quo
Not verified: opinion text unavailable.
'the status quo' before the unlawful agency action took place.
Not verified: opinion text unavailable.
30 Maryland v. King, 567 U.S. 1301 (2012) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Maryland v. King”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
31 MCR Oil Tools, L.L.C. v. United States Dep't of Transp., 110 F.4th 677 (5th Cir. 2024) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “MCR Oil Tools v. TRAN”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
32 Monsanto Co. v. Geertson Seed Farms, 561 U. S. 139 (2010) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 4 of 4 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Monsanto Co. v. Geertson Seed Farms”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“established a reasonable probability that their organic and conventional alfalfa crops [would] be infected with [an] engineered gene”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible. Brief signaled: “(internal quotation marks omitted)”.
“minimize the likelihood of potential contamination,”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“reasonable probability”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“substantial risk”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
33 Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Ass'n of the U.S., Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., 463 U.S. 29 (1983) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
34 Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418 (2009) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 2 of 2 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Nken v. Holder”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“strong showing”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“bears the burden of showing that the circumstances justify an exercise of [the Court's] discretion.”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
35 Optimus Steel, LLC v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng'rs, 492 F. Supp. 3d 701 (E.D. Tex. 2020) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The brief's reporter triple is independently confirmed by leagle.com's volume index, and CourtListener's docket index identifies the same case.
View matched docket on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“good explanation”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
36 Parker v. Dacres, 130 U.S. 43 (1889) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Parker v. Dacres”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
37 Peak v. D.C., === Footnotes === No. CV 06-0373 (JGP), 2006 WL 8445985 (D.D.C. Mar. 20, 2006) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
We couldn't independently confirm the reporter triple, but we believe this is the matching case based on CourtListener's docket index.
View matched docket on CourtListener →
38 Simmons v. UBS Fin. Servs., Inc., 972 F.3d 664 (5th Cir. 2020) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 2 of 2 located
How we matched this
The brief's reporter triple is independently confirmed by leagle.com's volume index, and CourtListener's docket index identifies the same case. Matched docket: “James Simmons v. UBS Financial Services, Inc”.
View matched docket on CourtListener →
View case page on GovInfo →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“looks to the law's substantive provisions to determine what interests (and hence which plaintiffs) are protected.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“benefit of any doubt”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
39 State of Ohio ex rel. Celebrezze v. U.S. Dep't of Transp., 766 F.2d 228 (6th Cir. 1985) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “State of Ohio v. United States Department of Transportation”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
40 Tex. Corn Prod'rs v. EPA, 141 F.4th 687 (5th Cir. 2025) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 2 of 2 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Texas Corn Producers v. EPA”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“whole point”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“whole point”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
41 Tex. Dep't of Hous. & Cmty. Affs. v. Inclusive Cmtys. Project, Inc., 576 U.S. 519 (2015) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Texas Dept. of Housing and Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project, Inc”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
42 Texas v. Becerra, 623 F. Supp. 3d 696 (N.D. Tex. 2022) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 3 of 3 located
How we matched this
The brief's reporter triple is independently confirmed by leagle.com's volume index, and CourtListener's docket index identifies the same case.
View matched docket on CourtListener →
View opinion on GovInfo →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“federal interference with the enforcement of state law”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“doctors [] violate [Louisiana's] abortion laws”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
“interferes with adherence to-and, therefore, enforcement of-[Louisiana's] laws.”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
43 Texas v. Biden, 646 F. Supp. 3d 753 (N.D. Tex. 2022) pacer paywall only
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· opinion text unavailable
How we matched this
The brief's reporter triple is independently confirmed by leagle.com's volume index, and CourtListener's docket index identifies the same case.
Why we couldn't check the quotes
We couldn't retrieve any opinion text for this citation from our public sources. The case may only be available on a paid service like Westlaw or Lexis. Without the text, we can't check whether the brief's quotes appear in the opinion.
View matched docket on CourtListener →Quotes attributed to this authority
These quotes have not been verified because the opinion text wasn't available. Use the docket link above to locate the cited ruling and compare directly.
[w]hether the effective date of the [2023 REMS] has passed is irrelevant to this Court's ability to issue a Section 705 stay.
Not verified: opinion text unavailable.
44 Texas v. United States Dep't of Health & Hum. Servs., 770 F. Supp. 3d 940 (E.D. Tex. 2025) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The brief's reporter triple is independently confirmed by leagle.com's volume index, and CourtListener's docket index identifies the same case. Matched docket: “Hospice of East Texas v. Secretary, US Department of Health of Human Services”.
View matched docket on CourtListener →
View case page on GovInfo →
45 Texas v. United States, 40 F.4th 205 (5th Cir. 2022) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “State of Texas v. United States”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“Despite the administrative inconvenience caused by this litigation, DHS has no interest in the perpetuation of unlawful agency action.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion. Brief signaled: “(citation modified)”.
46 Texas v. United States, 787 F.3d 733 (5th Cir. 2015) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “State of Texas v. USA”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
47 Texas v. United States, 809 F.3d 134 (5th Cir. 2015) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 6 of 6 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “State of Texas v. USA”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“effect on the states' fiscs.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“federal interference with the enforcement of state law.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion. Brief signaled: “(cleaned up)”, “(citations omitted)”.
“federal interference with the enforcement of state law,”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“is not meant to be especially demanding and is applied in keeping with Congress's evident intent when enacting the APA to make agency action presumptively reviewable.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion. Brief signaled: “(citation modified)”.
“The test forecloses suit only when a plaintiff's interests are so marginally related to or inconsistent with the purposes implicit in the statute that it cannot reasonably be assumed that Congress intended to permit the suit.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“marginally related”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
48 Trump v. CASA, Inc., 606 U.S. 831 (2025) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Trump v. CASA, Inc”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“determining the nationally uniform interim legal status ... of, say, the Clean Power Plan or Title IX regulations or mifepristone rules”
Found — the brief joined separate passages with ellipses (Bluebook R. 5.3).
49 Way of Life Television Network, Inc. v. FCC, 593 F.2d 1356 (D.C. Cir. 1979) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “The Way of Life Television Network, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Guaranty Broadcasting Corp., Intervenor”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
50 Wedgeworth v. Fibreboard Corp., 706 F.2d 541 (5th Cir. 1983) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 4 of 4 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Wedgeworth v. Fibreboard Corp”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“showing that the difficulties inherent in the general situation, including potential judicial inefficiency, constitute a sufficient offset to the plaintiffs' rights to proceed without inordinate delay to a resolution of their claims.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“realities of the hardship of a stay on the plaintiffs”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“hinged on completion of”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“is manifestly 'indefinite,'”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
51 Yates v. United States, 574 U.S. 528 (2015) brief quality flagged
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
Brief-quality observations
- A case named 'John L. Yates v. United States' exists in CourtListener at [{'volume': '135', 'reporter': 'S. Ct.', 'page': '1074'}, {'volume': '191', 'reporter': 'L. Ed. 2d', 'page': '64'}, {'volume': '2015', 'reporter': 'A.M.C.', 'page': '626'}, {'volume': '2015', 'reporter': 'U.S. LEXIS', 'page': '1503'}, {'volume': '25', 'reporter': 'Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S', 'page': '93'}, {'volume': '83', 'reporter': 'U.S.L.W.', 'page': '4120'}] (scotus, 2015), but the brief's citation does not match.
How we matched this
The brief's reporter triple is independently confirmed by leagle.com's volume index, and CourtListener's docket index identifies the same case.
Quotes attributed to this authority
“extra icing on a cake already frosted,”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
52 Young Conservatives of Tex. Found. v. Smatresk, 73 F.4th 304 (5th Cir. 2023) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Young Conservatives v. Smatresk”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“an economic injury is the quintessential injury upon which to base standing.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion. Brief signaled: “(citation modified)”.
53 FDA v. All. for Hippocratic Med. (Alliance), 602 U.S. 367, 380 (2024) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 3 of 3 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“a plaintiff must demonstrate (i) that she has suffered or likely will suffer an injury in fact, (ii) that the injury likely was caused or will be caused by the defendant, and (iii) that the injury likely would be redressed by the requested judicial relief.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“The second and third standing requirements-causation and redressability-are often 'flip sides of the same coin.'”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“that they could be forced to participate in an abortion or provide abortion-related medical treatment over their conscience objections.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
54 United States v. Texas, 599 U.S. 670, 687-88 (2023) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 6 of 6 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “United States v. Texas”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“challenge [] Executive Branch policies that indirectly caused them monetary harms”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
“the States have spent, and continue to spend, more money on law enforcement, incarceration, and social services”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“extraordinarily unusual lawsuit”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“only the narrow Article III standing question of whether the Federal Judiciary may in effect order the Executive Branch to take enforcement actions against violators of federal law,”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“The Court's standing decision today is narrow and simply maintains the longstanding jurisprudential status quo.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“federal policies [that] frequently generate indirect effects on state revenues or state spending,”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
55 Biden v. Nebraska, 600 U.S. 477, 490 (2023) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Biden v. Nebraska”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“financial harm is an injury in fact”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
56 Washington v. FDA, 108 F.4th 1163 (9th Cir. 2024) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 2 of 2 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “State of Washington v. Fda”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“highly speculative”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“heavily on speculation”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
57 Bolger v. Youngs Drug Prods. Corp., 463 U.S. 60, 70 n. (1983) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 2 of 2 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Bolger v. Youngs Drug Products Corp”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“thrust”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“to prevent the mails from being used to corrupt the public morals”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
58 Sierra Club v. City of San Antonio, 115 F.3d 311, 315 (5th Cir. 1997) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Sierra Club v. City of San Antonio”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
59 Labrador v. Poe by & through Poe, 144 S. Ct. 921, 931 (2024) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The brief's reporter triple is independently confirmed by leagle.com's volume index, and CourtListener's docket index identifies the same case. Matched docket: “Labrador v. Poe”.
View matched docket on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“likelihood of success on the merits as an essential factor in determining when to grant emergency relief in individual cases.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
60 Wages & White Lion Invs., L.L.C. v. FDA, 16 F.4th 1130, 1144 (5th Cir. 2021) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Wages and White Lion Invst v. FDA”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“[T]he relief sought here would simply suspend administrative alteration of the status quo.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
61 Wash. Ass'n for Television & Child. v. FCC, 712 F.2d 677, 682 (D.C. Cir. 1983) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Washington Ass'n for Television & Children v. Federal Communications Commission”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“traditionally recognized”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
62 Randolph-Sheppard Vendors of Am. v. Weinberger, 795 F.2d 90, 107 (D.C. Cir. 1986) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Randolph-Sheppard Vendors of America v. Caspar W. Weinberger, National Council of State Agencies for the Blind v. Caspar W. Weinberger”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“is where irreparable injury would result unless immediate judicial review is permitted.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
63 Procter & Gamble Co. v. Kraft Foods Global, Inc., 549 F.3d 842, 847-50 (Fed. Cir. 2008) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Procter & Gamble Co. v. Kraft Foods Global, Inc”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
64 Landis v. N. Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 251-52 (1936) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Landis v. North American Co”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“must make out a clear case of hardship or inequity in being required to go forward, if there is even a fair possibility that the stay for which he prays will work damage to some one [sic] else.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
65 Ricci v. Chicago Mercantile Exchange, 409 U.S. 289, 291, 305 (1973) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Ricci v. Chicago Mercantile Exchange”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
66 Washington v. FDA, No. 1:23-cv-03026 (E.D. Wash. Apr. 7, 2023) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
We couldn't independently confirm the reporter triple, but we believe this is the matching case based on CourtListener's docket index. Matched docket: “State of Washington v. United States Food and Drug Administration”.
View matched docket on CourtListener →
View case page on GovInfo →
67 21 U.S.C. § 331 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
68 21 U.S.C. § 355-1 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
Pass· 2 of 2 located
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“seriousness of any known or potential adverse events that may be related to the drug,”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“within 120 days or within [a]reasonable time.”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
69 5 U.S.C. § 704 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
70 5 U.S.C. § 705 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“all necessary and appropriate process to postpone the effective date of an agency action or to preserve status or rights pending conclusion of the review proceedings.”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
71 5 U.S.C. § 706 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“the whole record or those parts of it cited by a party.”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
72 21 C.F.R. § 10.30 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
73 94 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1927 manual verify
Citation exists?
Not verified
Source text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· source text unavailable
Please verify this one manually
This citation falls outside our automated coverage. Law reviews, treatises, restatements, and legislative packages predating govinfo's collection window don't have a free full-text source we can reliably retrieve. The citation itself looks well-formed; a reviewer with access to HeinOnline, Westlaw, Lexis, or a law library can confirm. This isn't a defect in the citation; it's a coverage gap in our automated sources.
Quotes attributed to this authority
These quotes have not been verified because the source text wasn't retrieved.
It is only if the violation of the federal law or the Constitution interferes with state law that a state suffers a sovereign injury supporting sovereign standing.
Not verified: source text unavailable.
74 77 Vand. L. Rev. 937 manual verify
Citation exists?
Not verified
Source text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
Please verify this one manually
This citation falls outside our automated coverage. Law reviews, treatises, restatements, and legislative packages predating govinfo's collection window don't have a free full-text source we can reliably retrieve. The citation itself looks well-formed; a reviewer with access to HeinOnline, Westlaw, Lexis, or a law library can confirm. This isn't a defect in the citation; it's a coverage gap in our automated sources.
77 id., flagged
Citation exists?
Pass
· medium confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
0 of 2 located
Why we flagged this
- At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.
Quotes attributed to this authority
“protect the public health,”
Not found in the cited source text. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.
“assure the safety, effectiveness, and reliability”
Not found in the cited source text. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.
81 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5(b)(2)(C) clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
82 La. R.S. § 14:87.6 manual verify
Citation exists?
Not verified
Source text retrieved?
Link only
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
Please verify this one manually
We've identified the source URL for this citation, but the host blocks automated tools so we couldn't pull the text to verify the quotes ourselves. The link below opens fine in a browser; click through to manually confirm the section text matches the brief.
View text on state code →83 La. R.S. § 40:1061.1(A)(2) manual verify
Citation exists?
Not verified
Source text retrieved?
Link only
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· source text unavailable
Please verify this one manually
We've identified the source URL for this citation, but the host blocks automated tools so we couldn't pull the text to verify the quotes ourselves. The link below opens fine in a browser; click through to manually confirm the section text matches the brief.
View text on state code →Quotes attributed to this authority
These quotes have not been verified because the source text wasn't retrieved. Use the link above to open the source and compare directly.
longstanding policy
Not verified: source text unavailable.
right to life of every unborn child from conception
Not verified: source text unavailable.
84 La. R.S. § 40:964(F) manual verify
Citation exists?
Not verified
Source text retrieved?
Link only
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
Please verify this one manually
We've identified the source URL for this citation, but the host blocks automated tools so we couldn't pull the text to verify the quotes ourselves. The link below opens fine in a browser; click through to manually confirm the section text matches the brief.
View text on state code →85 La. R.S. § 40:1061 manual verify
Citation exists?
Not verified
Source text retrieved?
Link only
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
Please verify this one manually
We've identified the source URL for this citation, but the host blocks automated tools so we couldn't pull the text to verify the quotes ourselves. The link below opens fine in a browser; click through to manually confirm the section text matches the brief.
View text on state code →86 H.R. 13959, 95th Cong. §§ 6701(a)(2), 6702(1)(C)(i) (1978) manual verify
Citation exists?
Not verified
Source text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· source text unavailable
Please verify this one manually
This citation falls outside our automated coverage. Law reviews, treatises, restatements, and legislative packages predating govinfo's collection window don't have a free full-text source we can reliably retrieve. The citation itself looks well-formed; a reviewer with access to HeinOnline, Westlaw, Lexis, or a law library can confirm. This isn't a defect in the citation; it's a coverage gap in our automated sources.
Quotes attributed to this authority
These quotes have not been verified because the source text wasn't retrieved.
illegal abortions.
Not verified: source text unavailable.
87 H.R. Rep. No. 95-29, pt. 3, at 42 (1978) manual verify
Citation exists?
Not verified
Source text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· source text unavailable
Please verify this one manually
This citation falls outside our automated coverage. Law reviews, treatises, restatements, and legislative packages predating govinfo's collection window don't have a free full-text source we can reliably retrieve. The citation itself looks well-formed; a reviewer with access to HeinOnline, Westlaw, Lexis, or a law library can confirm. This isn't a defect in the citation; it's a coverage gap in our automated sources.
Quotes attributed to this authority
These quotes have not been verified because the source text wasn't retrieved.
change[ ] current law by requiring proof … to produce an illegal abortion
Not verified: source text unavailable.
§Record & filing references (53)
Citations to filings in this case or its record — appendices, docket entries, pleadings. These aren't published authority, so we don't retrieve or verify them. They're listed here so every citation in the brief is accounted for.
ECF 51 at 1
docket filing
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- the concerns about removing the in-person dispensing requirement foreshadowed by the Fifth Circuit.
- the concerns about removing the in-person dispensing requirement foreshadowed by the Fifth Circuit
- the lack of adequate consideration underlying
- Gold Standard Science and rigorous, transparent, and objective evidence,
- a year or more,
ECF 1, ¶ 59
docket filing
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- ban or severely restrict access to these medications.
- medication abortion
- mail.
ECF 1-52 at 5
docket filing
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- [r]ates of occurrence [for an adverse event] cannot be established with [FAERS] reports.
- are not an indicator of the safety profile of the drug.
ECF 1-10 at 35
docket filing
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- not inconsistent with [FDA's] conclusion
- minimally burdensome
- necessary to mitigate
- not adequate on their own to establish the safety of … dispensing mifepristone by mail.
ECF 51 at 10
docket filing
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- disrupt
- it is not in the public interest to interrupt the administrative process.
ECF 52-4 at 17
docket filing
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- some judges
ECF 20-26 at 21
docket filing
not verified
ECF 20-26 at 21-23
docket filing
not verified
ECF 1 ¶¶ 100-02
docket filing
not verified
Toner Decl. ¶ 4-6
party filing
not verified
ECF 20-26 at 6
docket filing
not verified
ECF 1-10
docket filing
not verified
ECF 20-26 at 23
docket filing
not verified
ECF 52-4 at 6
docket filing
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- Louisiana's abortion laws unenforceable.
ECF 51 at 14-16
docket filing
not verified
ECF 54-4 at 9
docket filing
not verified
ECF 1, ¶ 54
docket filing
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- was going to be very important especially in states where surgical abortions are not permitted. And if they overturn Roe v. Wade, it's going to be really important.
- to push harder to make abortion pills available by telemedicine and mail.
- state[s with] abortion restrictions.
ECF 51 at 16
docket filing
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- link
- chain.
ECF 52-4 at 9
docket filing
not verified
ECF 20-26 at 24-25
docket filing
not verified
ECF 1, ¶ 51
docket filing
not verified
ECF 54-4 at 10
docket filing
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- various public officials,
ECF 20-26 at 5
docket filing
not verified
ECF 52-4 at 14-15
docket filing
not verified
ECF 54-4 at 12
docket filing
not verified
ECF 20-16 at 4
docket filing
not verified
ECF 52-4 at 18-19
docket filing
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- scientific judgment
- supported
ECF 1-10 at 27
docket filing
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- to determine if there was a difference in adverse events when in-person dispensing was and was not enforced.
ECF 1-50 at 64-65
docket filing
not verified
ECF 1-52 at 3
docket filing
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- cannot be used to calculate the incidence of an adverse event,
ECF 1-10 at 20
docket filing
not verified
ECF 52-4 at 21-22
docket filing
not verified
ECF 54-4 at 20-21
docket filing
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- illegal abortions
ECF 101 at 5
docket filing
not verified
ECF 103-1 at 9
docket filing
not verified
ECF 20-26 at 15
docket filing
not verified
ECF 1 ¶¶ 32-40
docket filing
not verified
ECF 20-26 at 15-16
docket filing
not verified
ECF 1-92
docket filing
not verified
ECF 51 at 3
docket filing
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- short-circuit the agency's orderly review.
- administrative inconvenience
- may prove [] unnecessary
- sooner than
- a year or more.
ECF 51 at 4
docket filing
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- administrative and judicial chaos
ECF 20-16 at 5
docket filing
not verified
ECF 54-4 at 24
docket filing
not verified
ECF 20-26 at 16-17
docket filing
not verified
ECF 51 at 11
docket filing
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- status quo,
ECF 1-34
docket filing
not verified
ECF No. 80 at 17
docket filing
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- credibly argue that its decision on the Mifepristone REMS Program would change upon another citizen petition.
ECF 52-4 at 16
docket filing
not verified
Footnote 1
footnote
not verified
Footnote 2
footnote
not verified
Footnote 5
footnote
not verified
Footnote 17
footnote
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- [T]he inability to enforce its duly enacted plans clearly inflicts irreparable harm on the State[.]
Footnote 18
footnote
not verified