perry-bruno-v-bluetriton

1 Ries v. Ariz. Bevs. USA LLC, 287 F.R.D. 523, 533 (N.D. Cal. 2012) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 1 of 1 located

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Ries v. Arizona Beverages USA LLC”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“(1) [he] has suffered an 'injury in fact' that is (a) concrete and particularized and (b) actual or imminent, not conjectural or hypothetical; (2) the injury is fairly traceable to the challenged action of the defendant; and (3) it is likely, as opposed to merely speculative, that the injury will be redressed by a favorable decision.” Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.

2 Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Ashcroft v. Iqbal”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

3 Baker v. Nestle S.A., No. 218CV03097VAPPJWX, 2019 WL 960204, at *2 (C.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2019) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · medium confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

We couldn't independently confirm the reporter triple, but we believe this is the matching case based on CourtListener's docket index.

View matched docket on CourtListener →

4 Bell v. Publix Super Markets, Inc. 982 F.3d 468, 478 (7th Cir. 2020) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · medium confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 2 of 2 located

View opinion on GovInfo →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“100% cheese” Found word-for-word in the opinion.

“what matters most is how real consumers understand and react to the advertising… [c]onsumer protection laws do not impose on average consumers an obligation to question the labels they see and to parse them as lawyers might for ambiguities, especially in the seconds usually spent picking a low-cost product.” Found — the brief joined separate passages with ellipses (Bluebook R. 5.3).

5 Bennett v. Schmidt, 153 F.3d 516, 518 (7th Cir. 1998) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Valerie Bennett v. Marie Schmidt”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

6 Cabral v. Supple, LLC, 2012 WL 4343867, at *2-3 (C.D. Cal. Sept. 19, 2012) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · medium confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

We couldn't independently confirm the reporter triple, but we believe this is the matching case based on CourtListener's docket index.

View matched docket on CourtListener →

7 Campion v. Old Republic Home Prot. Co., Inc., 861 F. Supp. 2d 1139, 1150 (S.D. Cal. 2012) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Campion v. Old Republic Home Protection Co”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

8 Castagnola v. Hewlett-Packard Co., 2012 WL 2159385, *5 (N.D. Cal. June 13, 2012) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · medium confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

We couldn't independently confirm the reporter triple, but we believe this is the matching case based on CourtListener's docket index.

View matched docket on CourtListener → View opinion on GovInfo →

9 Chen-Oster v. Goldman, Sachs & Co., 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12961 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 19, 2012) brief quality flagged

Case exists as cited?

Not verified

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

Brief-quality observations

• A case named 'Chen-Oster v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.' exists in CourtListener at 116 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 755, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99270, 2012 WL 2912741, 83 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 64, 877 F. Supp. 2d 113 (nysd, 2012). The brief cites it as 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12961 — the brief's citation does not match the real instrument.

10 Clerkin v. MyLife.com, Inc., 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96735 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2011) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · medium confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

We couldn't independently confirm the reporter triple, but we believe this is the matching case based on CourtListener's docket index.

View matched docket on CourtListener → View opinion on GovInfo →

11 Connelly v. Hilton Grand Vacations Co., 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81332, *7 (S.D. Cal. June 11, 2012) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · medium confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 1 of 1 located

How we matched this

We couldn't independently confirm the reporter triple, but we believe this is the matching case based on CourtListener's docket index.

View matched docket on CourtListener → View opinion on GovInfo →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“To the extent that Hilton seeks to 'resolve class claims at the pleading stage, … however, its motion is improperly brought pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).” Found — the brief joined separate passages with ellipses (Bluebook R. 5.3).

12 County v. Automated Med. Labs., Inc., 471 U.S. 707, 712 (1985) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

13 Covillo v. Specialtys Café, No. C-11-00594 DMR, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 147489, at *17-18 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2011) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · medium confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

We couldn't independently confirm the reporter triple, but we believe this is the matching case based on CourtListener's docket index.

View matched docket on CourtListener → View opinion on GovInfo →

14 Davidson v. Kimberly-Clark Corp., 873 F.3d 1103, 1115 (9th Cir. 2017) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 1 of 1 located

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Jennifer Davidson v. Kimberly-Clark Corp”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“today, we resolve this district court split in favor of plaintiffs seeking injunctive relief. We hold that a previously deceived consumer may have standing to seek an injunction against false advertising or labeling, even though the consumer now knows or suspects that the advertising was false at the time of the original purchase, because the consumer may suffer an "actual and imminent, not conjectural or hypothetical" threat of future harm…Knowledge that the advertisement or label was false in the past does not equate to knowledge that it will remain false in the future. In some cases, the threat of future harm may be the consumer's plausible allegations that she will be unable to rely on the product's advertising or labeling in the future, and so will not purchase the product although she would like to.” Found — the brief joined separate passages with ellipses (Bluebook R. 5.3).

15 Dolin v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC, 901 F.3d 803, 811 (7th Cir. 2018) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 1 of 1 located

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Dolin v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“invalidates state laws that 'interfere with, or are contrary to,' federal law.” Found word-for-word in the opinion.

16 Everest & Jennings, Inc. v. American Motorists Ins. Co., 23 F.3d 226, 228 clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Everest and Jennings, Inc. v. American Motorists Insurance Company”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

17 Harris v. Las Vegas Sands L.L.C., 2013 WL 5291142, at *4 (C.D. Cal. Aug. 16, 2013) pacer paywall only

Case exists as cited?

Pass · medium confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

No

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

We couldn't independently confirm the reporter triple, but we believe this is the matching case based on CourtListener's docket index.

View matched docket on CourtListener →

18 Henderson v. Gruma Corp., 2011 WL 1362188, at *7 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 11, 2011) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · medium confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

We couldn't independently confirm the reporter triple, but we believe this is the matching case based on CourtListener's docket index.

View matched docket on CourtListener →

19 Hibbs-Rines v. Seagate Techs., LLC, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19283 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 2, 2009) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · medium confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 1 of 1 located

How we matched this

We couldn't independently confirm the reporter triple, but we believe this is the matching case based on CourtListener's docket index.

View matched docket on CourtListener → View opinion on GovInfo →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“Discovery is integral to developing the shape and form of a class action and granting of motions to dismiss class allegations before discovery has commenced is rare'” Found — the brief signaled the modification with a Bluebook parenthetical, so we used a relaxed match. Brief signaled: “(citations omitted)”.

20 I.B. v. Facebook, Inc., 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 154327 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2012) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “I.B. ex rel. Fife v. Facebook, Inc”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

21 In re Coca-Cola Prod. Mktg. & Sales Pracs. Litig. (No II), In Re Coca-Cola Prod. Mktg. & Sales Pracs. Litig. (No II), No. 20-15742, 2021 WL 3878654 (9th Cir. Aug. 31, 2021) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · medium confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

We couldn't independently confirm the reporter triple, but we believe this is the matching case based on CourtListener's docket index.

View matched docket on CourtListener →

22 In re 5-hour ENERGY Mktg. & Sales Practices Litig., 2014 WL 5311272, at *10-11 (C.D. Cal. 2014) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · medium confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

We couldn't independently confirm the reporter triple, but we believe this is the matching case based on CourtListener's docket index.

23 Jones v. ConAgra Foods, Inc., 912 F.Supp.2d 889, 899 (N.D. Cal. 2012) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Jones v. Conagra Foods, Inc”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

24 Jones v. Google LLC, 73 F.4th 636, 642 (9th Cir. 2023) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · medium confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The brief's reporter triple is independently confirmed by leagle.com's volume index, and CourtListener's docket index identifies the same case.

View matched docket on CourtListener → View opinion on GovInfo →

25 Kang v. P.F. Chang's China Bistro, Inc., 844 F. App'x 969, 971-72 (9th Cir. 2021) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · low confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

We couldn't independently confirm the reporter triple, but we believe this is the matching case based on CourtListener's docket index.

View matched docket on CourtListener →

26 Koehler v. Litehouse, Inc., 2012 WL 6217635, at *6 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 13, 2012) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · medium confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 1 of 1 located

How we matched this

We couldn't independently confirm the reporter triple, but we believe this is the matching case based on CourtListener's docket index.

View matched docket on CourtListener → View opinion on GovInfo →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“To do otherwise would eviscerate the intent of the California legislature in creating consumer protection statutes because it would effectively bar any consumer who avoids the offending product from seeking injunctive relief.” Found word-for-word in the opinion.

27 Kwikset Corp. v. Superior Court, 51 Cal.4th 310, 321 (2011) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Kwikset Corp. v. Superior Court”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

28 Lanovaz v. Twinings N. Am., Inc., 2014 WL 46822, at *10 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 6, 2014) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · medium confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

We couldn't independently confirm the reporter triple, but we believe this is the matching case based on CourtListener's docket index.

View matched docket on CourtListener → View opinion on GovInfo →

29 Larsen v. Trader Joe's Co., 2012 WL 5458396, at *4 (N.D. Cal. June 14, 2012) brief quality flagged

Case exists as cited?

Not verified

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

Brief-quality observations

• A case named 'Larsen v. Trader Joe's Co.' exists in CourtListener at 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3602, 2013 WL 132442, 917 F. Supp. 2d 1019 (cand, 2013). The brief cites it as 2012 WL 5458396 — the brief's citation does not match the real instrument.

30 Lyons v. Coxcom, Inc., 718 F. Supp. 2d 1232, 1235-36 (S.D. Cal. 2009) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Lyons v. Coxcom, Inc”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

31 N.L. Indus., Inc. v. Kaplan, 792 F.2d 896, 898 (9th Cir. 1986) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Nl Industries, Inc. v. Stuart M. Kaplan”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

32 Nelsen v. King County, 895 F.2d 1248, 1252 (9th Cir. 1990) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 1 of 1 located

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Ronald O. Nelsen Michael Bullene v. King County”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“an extended chain of highly speculative contingencies, all of which would have to be fulfilled,” Found word-for-word in the opinion.

33 Parks Sch. of Bus., Inc. v. Symington, 51 F.3d 1480, 1484 (9th Cir. 1995) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Parks School of Business, Inc., Dba Parks College, a New Mexico Corporation v. Fife Symington Roy A. Nicholson Sally Hein”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

34 Patriotic Veterans, Inc. v. Indiana, 736 F.3d 1041, 1049 clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Patriotic Veterans, Inc. v. State of Indiana”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

35 Puentes v. Wells Fargo Home Mortg., Inc., 160 Cal.App.4th 638, 645 (2008) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 1 of 1 located

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Puentes v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“is judged by the effect it would have on a reasonable consumer.” Found word-for-word in the opinion.

36 Rosado v. eBay Inc., Case No. 5:12-CV-04005-EJD, 2014 WL 2945774 (N.D. Cal. June 30, 2014) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Rosado v. Ebay Inc”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

37 Tamayo v. Blagojevich, 526 F.3d 1074, 1081 (7th Cir. 2008) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 1 of 1 located

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Tamayo v. Blagojevich”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“A complaint need not 'allege all, or any, of the facts logically entailed by the claim,' and it certainly need not include evidence.” Found word-for-word in the opinion.

38 Uni*Quality, Inc. v. Infotronx, Inc., 974 F.2d 918, 923 clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 1 of 1 located

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “UniQuality, Inc. v. Infotronx, Inc”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“does not require a plaintiff to plead facts that if true would show that the defendant's alleged misrepresentations were indeed false, it does require the plaintiff to state 'the identity of the person making the misrepresentation, the time, place, and content of the misrepresentation, and the method by which the misrepresentation was communicated to the plaintiff.'” Found word-for-word in the opinion.

39 Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes, 131 S.Ct. 2541 (2011) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

40 Williams v. Gerber Products Co., 552 F.3d 934, 938 (9th Cir. 2008) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 3 of 3 located

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Williams v. Gerber Products Co”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“members of the public are likely to be deceived.” Found word-for-word in the opinion.

“Whether a practice is deceptive, fraudulent, or unfair is generally a question of fact that is not appropriate for resolution on the pleadings.” This quote does not appear in the cited opinion's text, but may be a canonical restatement of the opinion — the language appears in another opinion this brief cites.

“Whether a practice is deceptive, fraudulent, or unfair is generally a question of fact that is not appropriate for resolution on the pleadings.” This quote does not appear in the cited opinion's text, but may be a canonical restatement of the opinion — the language appears in another opinion this brief cites.

41 Bankers Trust Co. v. Old Republic Ins. Co., 959 F.2d 677, 683 clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Bankers Trust Company, Cross-Appellee v. Old Republic Insurance Company, Cross-Appellants”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

42 Hickman v. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495, 511, 67 S. Ct. 385, 393, 91 L. Ed. 451 (1947) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Hickman v. Taylor”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

43 Cholakyan, 796 F. Supp. 2d at 1245-46 retrieval gap

Case exists as cited?

Pass · medium confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

No

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · opinion text unavailable

Why we couldn't check the quotes

We couldn't retrieve any opinion text for this citation from our public sources. The case may only be available on a paid service like Westlaw or Lexis. Without the text, we can't check whether the brief's quotes appear in the opinion.

Quotes attributed to this authority

These quotes have not been verified because the opinion text wasn't available.

Rule 12(b)(6) is not the appropriate procedural vehicle to challenge class allegations. Accordingly, Defendants' Rule 12(b)(6) motion concerning Plaintiffs' class allegations is denied.

Not verified: opinion text unavailable.

44 Reiter v. Cooper, 507 U.S. 258, 259 (1993) flagged

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

0 of 1 located

Why we flagged this

• At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Reiter v. Cooper”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“[T]he doctrine of primary jurisdiction requires only that a court enable 'referral' to an administrative agency of a claim containing an issue within the agency's special competence but does not deprive the court of jurisdiction.” Not found in the cited opinion. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.

45 Brown v. MCI WorldCom Network Servs., Inc., 277 F.3d 1166, 1172 clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · medium confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “William J. Brown, Iii v. Mci Worldcom Network Services, Inc”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

46 Syntek Semiconductor Co. v. Microchip Tech. Inc., 307 F.3d 775, 780 (9th Cir. 2002) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Syntek Semiconductor Co. v. Microchip Technology Inc”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

47 Peerless Network, Inc. v. MCI Commc'ns Servs., Inc., 917 F.3d 538, 542 (7th Cir. 2019) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Peerless Network, Inc. v. MCI Communications Services, I”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

48 United States ex rel. Sheet Metal Workers Int'l Ass'n, Local Union 20 v. Horning Investments, LLC, 828 F.3d 587, 592 (7th Cir. 2016) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “United States ex rel. Sheet Metal Workers International Ass'n, Local Union 20 v. Horning Investments, LLC”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

49 Slowinski v. Forces of Nature, Inc., No. 20 CV 2381, 2021 WL 1165099, at *4 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 26, 2021) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

We couldn't independently confirm the reporter triple, but we believe this is the matching case based on CourtListener's docket index. Matched docket: “Slowinski v. Forces of Nature, Inc”.

View matched docket on CourtListener → View case page on GovInfo →

50 City of Chicago v. Purdue Pharma L.P., 211 F. Supp. 3d 1058, 1065 (N.D. Ill. 2016) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “City of Chicago v. Purdue Pharma L.P”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

51 Gubala v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc., No. 14 C 9039, 2016 WL 1019794, at *16 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 15, 2016) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · medium confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 1 of 1 located

How we matched this

We couldn't independently confirm the reporter triple, but we believe this is the matching case based on CourtListener's docket index.

View matched docket on CourtListener → View opinion on GovInfo →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“The Court is well qualified to interpret the regulations and to resolve matters regarding allegations of false and misleading representations.” Found word-for-word in the opinion.

52 Noohi v. Kraft Heinz Co., No. CV1910658DSFSKX, 2020 WL 5554255, at *1 (C.D. Cal. July 20, 2020) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · medium confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

We couldn't independently confirm the reporter triple, but we believe this is the matching case based on CourtListener's docket index.

View matched docket on CourtListener →

53 Eminence Capital, LLC v. Aspeon, Inc., 316 F.3d 1048, 1051 (9th Cir. 2003) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

Pass· 1 of 1 located

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. Stack”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“Generally, Rule 15 advises the court that 'leave shall be freely given when justice so requires.' This policy is 'to be applied with extreme liberality.'” Found word-for-word in the opinion.

54 Roney v. Miller 705 Fed. Appx. 670 (9th Cir. 2017) clean

Case exists as cited?

Pass · high confidence

Opinion text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in opinion?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Buffy Roney v. Michael Miller”.

View matched opinion on CourtListener →

56 Cal. Business & Professions Code §§ 17500 manual verify

Citation exists?

Not verified

Source text retrieved?

No

Quotes found in source?

N/A · no quotes to check

Please verify this one manually

This citation falls outside our automated coverage. Law reviews, treatises, restatements, and legislative packages predating govinfo's collection window don't have a free full-text source we can reliably retrieve. The citation itself looks well-formed; a reviewer with access to HeinOnline, Westlaw, Lexis, or a law library can confirm. This isn't a defect in the citation; it's a coverage gap in our automated sources.

57 Cal. Business & Professions Code §§ 17200 manual verify

Citation exists?

Not verified

Source text retrieved?

No

Quotes found in source?

N/A · no quotes to check

Please verify this one manually

This citation falls outside our automated coverage. Law reviews, treatises, restatements, and legislative packages predating govinfo's collection window don't have a free full-text source we can reliably retrieve. The citation itself looks well-formed; a reviewer with access to HeinOnline, Westlaw, Lexis, or a law library can confirm. This isn't a defect in the citation; it's a coverage gap in our automated sources.

58 Cal. Civ. Code § 1750 clean

Citation exists?

Pass · medium confidence

Source text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in source?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

Matched on the state code's official online publication.

View text on state code →

59 21 U.S.C. § 343 clean

Citation exists?

Pass · high confidence

Source text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in source?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).

View text on Cornell Law (LII) →

60 Cal. Health & Safety Code § 110660 clean

Citation exists?

Pass · medium confidence

Source text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in source?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

Matched on the state code's official online publication.

View text on state code →

61 21 C.F.R. § 165.110 clean

Citation exists?

Pass · high confidence

Source text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in source?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).

View text on Cornell Law (LII) →

62 Id. clean

Citation exists?

Pass · high confidence

Source text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in source?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).

View text on Cornell Law (LII) →

65 Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) clean

Citation exists?

Pass · high confidence

Source text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in source?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).

View text on Cornell Law (LII) →

66 Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2) clean

Citation exists?

Pass · high confidence

Source text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in source?

Pass· 1 of 1 located

How we matched this

Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).

View text on Cornell Law (LII) →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“[t]he Court should freely give leave [to amend a pleading] when justice so requires.” Found word-for-word in the source text.

67 Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 clean

Citation exists?

Pass · high confidence

Source text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in source?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).

View text on Cornell Law (LII) →

68 Fed. R. Civ. P. 9(b) clean

Citation exists?

Pass · high confidence

Source text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in source?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).

View text on Cornell Law (LII) →

69 21 CFR 165 clean

Citation exists?

Pass · high confidence

Source text retrieved?

Yes

Quotes found in source?

Pass· 1 of 1 located

How we matched this

Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).

View text on Cornell Law (LII) →

Quotes attributed to this authority

“[t]he name of water derived from an underground formation from which water flows naturally to the surface of the earth may be 'spring water.'” This quote does not appear in the cited opinion's text, but may be a canonical restatement of the opinion — the language appears in another opinion this brief cites.

70 58 Fed. Reg. 2302-01 retrieval gap

Citation exists?

Pass · medium confidence

Source text retrieved?

No

Quotes found in source?

N/A · no quotes to check

How we matched this

Resolved as a non-case authority (statute, rule, or regulation).

View text on GovInfo →