Report
singer-v-waters
54 authorities checked
How this report was built
AI inference calls
0
Citations parsed
54
Sources queried
4
Cornell LII, CourtListener, State code databases, govinfo
Source texts retrieved
49
Quotes checked
27
22 matched in source text
Verification runs deterministically against authoritative public databases. Your brief is not sent to OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or any other third-party model.
Click any citation below to see how we verified it, the matched source, and a per-quote breakdown.
§Authorities
|
1 Alers v. Bank of Am., NA, Case No. CV 14-611-GW(JCGx), 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 199727 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 24, 2014) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
We couldn't independently confirm the reporter triple, but we believe this is the matching case based on CourtListener's docket index.
View matched docket on CourtListener →
2 Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 2 of 2 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Ashcroft v. Iqbal”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“must be supported by factual allegations.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“naked assertions' devoid of 'further factual enhancement”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
3 B&G Foods N. Am., Inc. v. Embry, 29 F.4th 527 (9th Cir. 2022) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 5 of 5 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “B&G Foods North America, Inc. v. Kim Embry”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“whether the lawsuit imposes a burden on petitioning rights; (2) whether the alleged activities constitute protected petitioning activity; and (3) whether the statute at issue may construed to avoid that burden.”
Found — the brief joined separate passages from the opinion.
“In conducting this inquiry, [federal courts] do not consider any alleged misconduct tied to the petitioning activities,”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
“places a burden on [defendant's] ability to prosecute its suit.”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
“Sham petitioning is not protected”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“can be construed to avoid burdening [d]efendants' petition clause rights.”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
4 Barron v. Reich, 13 F.3d 1370 (9th Cir. 1994) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Richard L. Barron Linda M. Barron v. Robert Reich Department of Labor Robert Kelley”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
5 Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“[A]plaintiff's obligation to provide the grounds of his entitlement to relief requires more than labels and conclusions, and a formulaic recitation of the elements of a cause of action will not do.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
6 Cooper v. Ramos, 704 F.3d 772 (9th Cir. 2012) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Kevin Cooper v. Michael Ramos”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
7 Doe v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal., 891 F.3d 1147 (9th Cir. 2018) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “John Doe v. Regents of the University”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“grant injunctive relief against a state instrumentality on the basis of state law.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
8 Ezra v. Leifer, Case No. CV 18-871-MWF (KS), 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 142005 (C.D. Cal. June 27, 2018) pacer paywall only
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· opinion text unavailable
How we matched this
We couldn't independently confirm the reporter triple, but we believe this is the matching case based on CourtListener's docket index.
Why we couldn't check the quotes
We couldn't retrieve any opinion text for this citation from our public sources. The case may only be available on a paid service like Westlaw or Lexis. Without the text, we can't check whether the brief's quotes appear in the opinion.
View matched docket on CourtListener →Quotes attributed to this authority
These quotes have not been verified because the opinion text wasn't available. Use the docket link above to locate the cited ruling and compare directly.
based on any protected petitioning conduct.
Not verified: opinion text unavailable.
9 Flores v. Emerich & Fike, 416 F. Supp. 2d 885 (E.D. Cal. 2006) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Flores v. Emerich & Fike”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
10 Freeman v. Lasky, Haas & Cohler, 410 F.3d 1180 (9th Cir. 2005) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Freeman v. Lasky, Haas & Cohler”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“Noerr-Pennington immunity…[applies] to defensive pleadings.”
Found — the brief joined separate passages with ellipses (Bluebook R. 5.3).
11 Kearney v. Foley & Lardner, LLP, 590 F.3d 638 (9th Cir. 2009) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Kearney v. Foley & Lardner, LLP”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“extends to all departments of the government and includes access to courts.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
12 Kimbell v. Benner, Case No. CV 17-4767 FMO (SS), 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120138 (C.D. Cal June 29, 2018) flagged
Case exists as cited?
Not verified
Opinion text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
Why we flagged this
- No matching case-law record found via CourtListener (citation lookup, docket lookup, name search), court-specific adapters, govinfo, or web search. The citation triple did not appear in any of our case-law databases.
13 Kottle v. Northwest Kidney Ctrs., 146 F.3d 1056 (9th Cir. 1998) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Sheldon P. KOTTLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORTHWEST KIDNEY CENTERS, Defendant-Appellee”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
14 Krainski v. State ex rel. Bd. of Regents, 616 F.3d 963 (9th Cir. 2010) flagged
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
0 of 1 located
Why we flagged this
- At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Krainski v. Nevada Ex Rel. Board of Regents”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“The Eleventh Amendment jurisdictional bar applies regardless of the nature relief sought and extends to state instrumentalities and agencies.”
The brief's quote matches 100% of the cited opinion, but in separate passages — not as one continuous quote. This typically means the brief either paraphrased inside the quotation marks (Bluebook Rule 5.2 requires brackets for any substitution) or silently omitted intervening text (Bluebook Rule 5.3 requires “. . .” for omissions). Compare the brief's quotation against the cited opinion.
What diverges
brief: …lies regardless of the nature relief sought and extends to s…
opinion: …lies regardless of the nature of relief sought and extends to s…
15 Lee v. City of Los Angeles, 250 F.3d 668 (9th Cir. 2001) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Lee v. City Of Los Angeles”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
16 Manistee Town Ctr. v. City of Glendale, 227 F.3d 1090 (9th Cir. 2000) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Manistee Town Center v. City of Glendale”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
17 Noel v. Hall, 341 F.3d 1148 (9th Cir. 2002) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Eric Noel v. Brian C. Hall Sandra A. Hall, Fka Sandra Johnson, and Gabrielle S. Lennartz Herb Weisser Michelle A. Merchant”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
18 Papasan v. Allain, 478 U.S. 265 (1986) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Papasan v. Allain”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
19 Port Drum Co. v. Umphrey, 852 F.2d 148 (5th Cir. 1988) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Port Drum Company v. Walter Umphrey and Kurt B. Chacon”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
20 Prof'l Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Indus., 508 U.S. 49 (1993) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
21 Romano v. Bible, 169 F.3d 1182 (9th Cir. 1999) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Romano v. Bible”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
22 Skinner v. Switzer, 562 U.S. 521 (2011) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Skinner v. Switzer”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“Rooker-Feldman is confined to cases of the kind from which the doctrine acquired its name: cases brought by state-court losers…inviting district court review and rejection of [the state court's] judgments.”
Found in the opinion.
23 Sosa v. DIRECTV, Inc., 437 F.3d 923 (9th Cir. 2006) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Sosa v. DIRECTV, Inc”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“extended the doctrine to provide immunity for the use of the channels and procedures of state and federal courts to advocate causes.”
This quote does not appear in the cited opinion's text, but may be a canonical restatement of the opinion — the language appears in another opinion this brief cites.
24 Sprewell v. Golden State Warriors, 266 F.3d 979 (9th Cir. 2001) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Sprewell v. Golden State Warriors”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“required to accept as true allegations that are merely conclusory, unwarranted deductions of fact, or unreasonable inferences.”
Found — the brief joined separate passages from the opinion.
25 Stone v. Writer's Guild of America West, Inc., 101 F.3d 1312 (9th Cir. 1996) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Jerico Stone v. Writer's Guild of America West, Inc., a California Corporation Frank Pierson Del Reisman, Does 1 Through 20, Inclusive”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
26 Wilson v. Leigh Law Grp., P.C. (LLG), Case No. 20-cv-03045-MMC, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124830 (N.D. Cal. July 14, 2000) retrieval gap
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· opinion text unavailable
How we matched this
We couldn't independently confirm the reporter triple, but we believe this is the matching case based on CourtListener's docket index.
Why we couldn't check the quotes
We couldn't retrieve any opinion text for this citation from our public sources. The case may only be available on a paid service like Westlaw or Lexis. Without the text, we can't check whether the brief's quotes appear in the opinion.
View matched docket on CourtListener → View case page on GovInfo →Quotes attributed to this authority
These quotes have not been verified because the opinion text wasn't available. Use the docket link above to locate the cited ruling and compare directly.
Litigation activity is considered objectively baseless only where 'no reasonable litigant could realistically expect success on the merits.
Not verified: opinion text unavailable.
27 Alberston v. Raboff (1956) 46 Cal.2d 375 brief quality flagged
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
Brief-quality observations
- Case name in the brief looks like a typo of the official record.
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Albertson v. Raboff”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
28 Cansino v. Bank of America, 224 Cal. App. 4th 1462 (2014) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 2 of 2 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Cansino v. Bank of America”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“Fraud allegations 'involve a serious attach on character' and therefore are pleaded with specificity.”
Found — minor punctuation or spacing differences.
29 Friedman v. Knecht, 248 Cal. App. 2d 455 (1967) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Friedman v. Knecht”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
30 Hagberg v. California Federal Bank FSB, 32 Cal. 4th 39 (2004) brief quality flagged
Case exists as cited?
Not verified
Opinion text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· opinion text unavailable
Brief-quality observations
- A case named 'Hagberg v. California Federal Bank FSB' exists in CourtListener at 2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 75, 2004 Cal. LEXIS 1233, 2004 Daily Journal DAR 99, 32 Cal. 4th 350, 7 Cal. Rptr. 3d 803, 81 P.3d 244 (cal, 2004). The brief cites it as 32 Cal. 4th 39 — the brief's citation does not match the real instrument.
Why we flagged this
- We couldn't independently verify this citation against our public sources.
- We couldn't retrieve the source text from any of our public sources.
Why we couldn't check the quotes
We couldn't retrieve any opinion text for this citation from our public sources. The case may only be available on a paid service like Westlaw or Lexis. Without the text, we can't check whether the brief's quotes appear in the opinion.
Quotes attributed to this authority
These quotes have not been verified because the opinion text wasn't available.
[b]ecause the privilege applies without regard to malice or evil motives, it has been characterized as absolute.
Not verified: opinion text unavailable.
31 Herterich v. Peltner, 20 Cal. App. 5th 1132 (2018) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Herterich v. Peltner”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“[w]hile we by no means condone intentionally deceptive conduct before the courts, the litigation privilege is absolute.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
32 Hills Trans. Co. v. Southwest Forest Industries, Inc., 266 Cal. App. 2d 702 (1968) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Hills Transportation Co. v. Southwest Forest Industries, Inc”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
33 Laufman v. Hall-Mack Co., 215 Cal. App. 2d 87 (1963) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Laufman v. Hall-Mack Co”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
34 Lazar v. Superior Court, 12 Cal.4th 631 (1996) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Lazar v. Superior Court”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
35 Pollock v. University of Southern California, 112 Cal. App. 4th 1416 (2003) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Pollock v. University of Southern California”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
36 Port Medical Wellness, Inc. v. Connecticut General Life Ins. Co., 24 Cal. App. 5th 153 (2018) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Port Med. Wellness, Inc. v. Conn. Gen. Life Ins. Co”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
37 Rubin v. Green, 4 Cal. 4th 1187 (1993) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Rubin v. Green”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
38 Shafer v. Berger, Kahn, Shafton, Moss, Figler, Simon & Gladstone, 107 Cal. App. 4th 54 (2003) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Shafer v. Berger, Kahn, Shafton, Moss, Figler, Simon & Gladstone”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
39 Silberg v. Anderson, 50 Cal. 3d 205 (1990) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 2 of 2 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Silberg v. Anderson”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“interest of justice”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“inconsistent with the absolute nature of the litigation privilege and its underlying policy purposes.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
40 Smith v. Hatch, 271 Cal. App. 2d 39 (1969) flagged
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
0 of 1 located
Why we flagged this
- At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Smith v. Hatch”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“To be privileged under subdivision 2 of §47, the matter need not be relevant, pertinent or material to any issue before the court, it only need have some connection or some relation to the judicial proceeding.”
The brief's quote matches 97% of the cited opinion, but in separate passages — not as one continuous quote. This typically means the brief either paraphrased inside the quotation marks (Bluebook Rule 5.2 requires brackets for any substitution) or silently omitted intervening text (Bluebook Rule 5.3 requires “. . .” for omissions). Compare the brief's quotation against the cited opinion.
What diverges
brief: …leged under subdivision 2 of §47, the matter need not be relevant, …
opinion: …leged under subdivision 2 of § 47 the defamatory matter need not be relevant, …
41 Thrifty Payless, Inc. v. The Americana at Brand, LLC, 218 Cal. App. 4th 1230 (2013) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Thrifty Payless v. The Americana at Brand CA2/1”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“(a) misrepresentation (false representation, concealment, or nondisclosure); (b) knowledge of falsity (or "scienter"); (c) intent to defraud, i.e., to induce reliance; (d) justifiable reliance; and (e) resulting damage.”
Found — the brief joined separate passages from the opinion.
42 42 U.S.C. § 1983 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
43 Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 10140-10148 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· medium confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
Matched on the state code's official online publication.
View text on state code →
44 Cal. Civ. Code § 47 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· medium confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
Matched on the state code's official online publication.
View text on state code →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“A privileged publication or broadcast is one made: . . . .(b) In any . . . (2) [j]udicial proceeding. . . .”
Found in the source text.
45 Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 425 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· medium confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
Matched on the state code's official online publication.
View text on state code →
46 Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 583 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· medium confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
Matched on the state code's official online publication.
View text on state code →
47 Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 2023 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· medium confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
Matched on the state code's official online publication.
View text on state code →
48 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
49 FRCP 11 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
50 Cal. Rules of Court, Rule 2.200 flagged
Citation exists?
Not verified
Source text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
Why we flagged this
- We couldn't independently verify this citation against our public sources.
51 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8(a)(2) clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
52 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1)(B) clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
53 Eleventh Amendment clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
N/A
How we matched this
Constitutional citation.
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
54 First Amendment clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
N/A
How we matched this
Constitutional citation.
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
§Record & filing references (1)
Citations to filings in this case or its record — appendices, docket entries, pleadings. These aren't published authority, so we don't retrieve or verify them. They're listed here so every citation in the brief is accounted for.
Doc. 21
docket filing
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- disputes of fact and law between parties on both sides, which are best handled by the court.