Report
stanley-v-city-of-sanford-pet
78 authorities checked
How this report was built
AI inference calls
0
Citations parsed
78
Sources queried
3
Cornell LII, CourtListener, govinfo
Source texts retrieved
63
Quotes checked
220
176 matched in source text
Verification runs deterministically against authoritative public databases. Your brief is not sent to OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or any other third-party model.
Click any citation below to see how we verified it, the matched source, and a per-quote breakdown.
§Authorities
|
1 Arellano v. McDonough, 598 U.S. 1 (2023) flagged
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
1 of 3 located
Why we flagged this
- At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Arellano v. McDonough”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“qualified individual”
Not found in the cited opinion. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.
“qualified individual”
Not found in the cited opinion. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.
“Start with the text.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
2 Arizona Governing Committee for Tax Deferred Annuity & Deferred Compensation Plans v. Norris, 463 U.S. 1073 (1983) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 3 of 3 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Arizona Governing Committee for Tax Deferred Annuity & Deferred Compensation Plans v. Norris”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“[t]here is no question”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“retirement benefits.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“classification of employees on the basis of [disability] is no more permissible at the pay-out stage of a retirement plan than at the pay-in stage.”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
3 Bank of America Corp. v. City of Miami, 581 U.S. 189 (2017) flagged
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
0 of 1 located
Why we flagged this
- At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Bank of Am. Corp. v. City of Miami”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“interests are so marginally related to or inconsistent with the purposes implicit in the statute that it cannot reasonably be assumed that Congress intended to permit the suit.”
The brief's quote matches 94% of the cited opinion, but in separate passages — not as one continuous quote. This typically means the brief either paraphrased inside the quotation marks (Bluebook Rule 5.2 requires brackets for any substitution) or silently omitted intervening text (Bluebook Rule 5.3 requires “. . .” for omissions). Compare the brief's quotation against the cited opinion.
What diverges
brief: …in the statute that it cannot reasonably be assumed that congress inten…
opinion: …in the statute that it cannot be assumed that congress inten…
4 Barnhart v. Thomas, 540 U.S. 20 (2003) flagged
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
2 of 3 located
Why we flagged this
- At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Barnhart v. Thomas”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“that such individual holds or desires”
This quote does not appear in the cited opinion's text, but may be a canonical restatement of the opinion — the language appears in another opinion this brief cites.
“employment position.”
Not found in the cited opinion. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.
“[A]limiting clause or phrase … should ordinarily be read as modifying only the noun or phrase that it immediately follows.”
Found — the brief joined separate passages with ellipses (Bluebook R. 5.3).
5 Bethel v. Jefferson, 589 F.2d 631 (D.C. Cir. 1978) flagged
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
4 of 5 located
Why we flagged this
- At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Bethel v. Jefferson”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“holds or desires,”
Not found in the cited opinion. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.
“classical logic.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“unit”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“in the competitive service”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“holds simply that every alternation of a sentence with its negation is true.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
6 Biden v. Nebraska, 143 S. Ct. 2355 (2023) brief quality flagged
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
3 of 7 located
Brief-quality observations
- A case named 'Joseph R. Biden, President of the United States, et al., Petitioners v. Nebraska, et al.' exists in CourtListener at [{'volume': '600', 'reporter': 'U.S.', 'page': '477'}] (scotus, 2023), but the brief's citation does not match.
Why we flagged this
- At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.
How we matched this
The brief's reporter triple is independently confirmed by leagle.com's volume index, and CourtListener's docket index identifies the same case.
Quotes attributed to this authority
“hold[]or desire[]”
Not found in the cited opinion. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.
“employment position.”
Not found in the cited opinion. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.
“Context also includes common sense.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“The rules of legal interpretation are rules of common sense.”
Not found in the cited opinion. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.
“[w]ords are to be given the meaning that proper grammar and usage would assign them,”
This quote does not appear in the cited opinion's text, but may be a canonical restatement of the opinion — the language appears in another opinion this brief cites.
“rules of grammar govern”
Not found in the cited opinion. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.
“unless they contradict legislative intent or purpose,”
This quote does not appear in the cited opinion's text, but may be a canonical restatement of the opinion — the language appears in another opinion this brief cites.
7 Boesche v. Udall, 373 U.S. 472 (1963) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 3 of 3 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Boesche v. Udall”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“sp[oke] entirely in terms of post-lease occurrences”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
“assume[d]the existence of a valid lease”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
“self-defeating”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
8 Bond v. United States, 572 U.S. 844 (2014) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Bond v. United States”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“The notion that some things 'go without saying' applies to legislation just as it does to everyday life.”
Found — minor punctuation or spacing differences.
9 Castellano v. City of New York, 142 F.3d 58 (2d Cir. 1998) flagged
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
1 of 2 located
Why we flagged this
- At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Castellano v. City of New York”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“subject to”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“[A]n employee's entitlement to postemployment fringe benefits arises … during his period of employment.”
The brief's quote matches 97% of the cited opinion, but in separate passages — not as one continuous quote. This typically means the brief either paraphrased inside the quotation marks (Bluebook Rule 5.2 requires brackets for any substitution) or silently omitted intervening text (Bluebook Rule 5.3 requires “. . .” for omissions). Compare the brief's quotation against the cited opinion.
What diverges
brief: … employees entitlement to postemployment fringe benefits ari…
opinion: … employees entitlement to post-employment fringe benefits ari…
10 City of Chicago v. Fulton, 592 U.S. 154 (2021) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Chicago v. Fulton”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“The canon against surplusage is strongest when an interpretation would render superfluous another part of the same statutory scheme.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
11 - v -City of Los Angeles, Department of Water & Power v. Manhart, 435 U.S. 702 (1978) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “City of Los Angeles Department of Water v. Manhart”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
12 Costello v. INS, 376 U.S. 120 (1964) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Costello v. Immigration & Naturalization Service”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
13 Duncan v. Walker, 533 U.S. 167 (2001) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 3 of 3 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Duncan v. Walker”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“treat[s]”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“statutory terms as surplusage,”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“pivotal [] place in the statutory scheme”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
14 Florida v. Long, 487 U.S. 223 (1988) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Florida v. Long”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
15 Gardner v. Collins, 27 U.S. 58 (1829) flagged
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
1 of 2 located
Why we flagged this
- At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Gardner v. Collins”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“the words 'if any there be' [were] omitted”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
“the legislative intention in both acts was the same”
The brief's quote matches 94% of the cited opinion, but in separate passages — not as one continuous quote. This typically means the brief either paraphrased inside the quotation marks (Bluebook Rule 5.2 requires brackets for any substitution) or silently omitted intervening text (Bluebook Rule 5.3 requires “. . .” for omissions). Compare the brief's quotation against the cited opinion.
What diverges
brief: …the legislative intention in both…
opinion: …he. legislative intention in both…
16 District v. United States ex rel. Wilson, 545 U.S. 409 (2005) flagged
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
1 of 2 located
Why we flagged this
- At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Graham County Soil & Water Conservation District v. United States Ex Rel. Wilson”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“interpretation always depends on context.”
Not found in the cited opinion. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.
“Statutory language has meaning only in context.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
17 Green v. Brennan, 578 U.S. 547 (2016) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Green v. Brennan”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“single discriminatory act.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
18 Groff v. DeJoy, 600 U.S. 447 (2023) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Groff v. DeJoy”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“at war with itself.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
19 Heredia v. Sessions, 865 F.3d 60 (2d Cir. 2017) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 2 of 2 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Gomez Heredia v. Sessions”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“a restrictive clause”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“does not impose a separate temporal requirement”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
20 Hishon v. King & Spalding, 467 U.S. 69 (1984) flagged
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
6 of 9 located
Why we flagged this
- At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Hishon v. King & Spalding”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“terms, conditions, and privileges of employment”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“application procedures”
Not found in the cited opinion. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.
“a person's employment is completed.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“[a]benefit need not accrue before a person's employment is completed”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“part and parcel of the employment relationship”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“doled out in a discriminatory fashion.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“[t]here is no question”
Not found in the cited opinion. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.
“retirement benefits”
Not found in the cited opinion. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.
“discriminate.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
21 Howard Delivery Service, Inc. v. Zurich American Insurance Co., 547 U.S. 651 (2006) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Howard Delivery Service, Inc. v. Zurich American Insurance”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“[F]ringe benefits”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
22 -Kincaid v. Williams, 143 S. Ct. 2414 (2023) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The brief's reporter triple is independently confirmed by leagle.com's volume index, and CourtListener's docket index identifies the same case. Matched docket: “Kincaid v. Williams”.
View matched docket on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“limits.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
23 Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 550 U.S. 618 (2007) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Inc”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“adverse effects resulting from the past discrimination,”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
24 Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc., 572 U.S. 118 (2014) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“guesswork”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
25 Lightfoot v. Cendant Mortgage Corp., 580 U.S. 82 (2017) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Lightfoot v. Cendant Mortgage Corp”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“[T]he enactment of a new provision that mirrors the existing statutory text indicates … that the new provision has that same meaning.”
Found — the brief joined separate passages with ellipses (Bluebook R. 5.3).
26 Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians v. Patchak, 567 U.S. 209 (2012) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians v. Patchak”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
27 New York State Department of Social Services v. Dublino, 413 U.S. 405 (1973) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “New York State Department of Social Services v. Dublino”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“negate [the ADA's] own stated purposes.”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
28 Nielsen v. Preap, 586 U.S. 392 (2019) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Nielsen v. Preap”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
29 Parker Drilling Management Services, Ltd. v. Newton, 587 U.S. 601 (2019) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Parker Drilling Management Services, Ltd. v. Newton”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“'cardinal principal' of interpretation that courts must give effect, if possible, to every clause and word of a statute.”
Found — minor punctuation or spacing differences.
30 Pereira v. Sessions, 585 U.S. 198 (2018) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Pereira v. Sessions”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“[C]ommon sense,”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
31 PGA Tour, Inc. v. Martin, 532 U.S. 661 (2001) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 2 of 2 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “PGA Tour, Inc. v. Martin”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“Congress enacted the ADA in 1990 to remedy widespread discrimination against disabled individuals.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“to any person alleging discrimination on the basis of disability in violation of”
This quote does not appear in the cited opinion's text, but may be a canonical restatement of the opinion — the language appears in another opinion this brief cites.
32 Pulsifer v. United States, 601 U.S. 124 (2024) flagged
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
12 of 15 located
Why we flagged this
- At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Pulsifer v. United States”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“in its legal context,”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“inquiry into text and context”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“we can see why a Congress,”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“might have chosen”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“delivered us from interpretive controversy”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“grammatical back-and-forth.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“demand (or in truth expect) that Congress draft in the most translucent way possible.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“grammatical principle”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“context.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“[S]tated in the usual language of statutory construction, the answer [] lie[s]in considering the [definition's] text in its legal context.”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
“essential element of context that gives meaning to words”
Not found in the cited opinion. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.
“evident purpose of what a text seeks to achieve”
Not found in the cited opinion. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.
“superfluity.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“qualified individual”
Not found in the cited opinion. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.
“legal context.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
33 -Raytheon Co. v. Hernandez, 540 U.S. 44 (2003) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 2 of 2 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Raytheon Co. v. Hernandez”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“disparate treatment”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“disparate impact.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
34 Robinson v. Shell Oil Co., 519 U.S. 337 (1997) flagged
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
8 of 11 located
Why we flagged this
- At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Robinson v. Shell Oil Co”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“and the primary purpose of”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“qualified individual”
Not found in the cited opinion. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.
“the term 'employees,' as used in § 704(a) of Title VII”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“former employees”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“ambiguous”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“more consistent with the broader context of Title VII and the primary purpose of § 704(a)”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“former employees.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“qualified individual”
Not found in the cited opinion. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.
“qualified individual”
Not found in the cited opinion. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.
“at first blush,”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“the broader context of”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
35 Rubin v. Islamic Republic of Iran, 583 U.S. 202 (2018) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Rubin v. Islamic Republic of Iran”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“so that no part will be inoperative or superfluous, void or insignificant.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
36 Thompson v. North American Stainless, LP, 562 U.S. 170 (2011) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 2 of 2 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Thompson v. North American Stainless, LP”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“interest arguably sought to be protected by the statute”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“firing [of] a valuable employee for racially discriminatory reasons.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
37 Torres v. Lynch, 578 U.S. 452 (2016) flagged
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
2 of 3 located
Why we flagged this
- At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Luna Torres v. Lynch”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“The question, then, is not: Could Congress have indicated”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“in more crystalline fashion”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“The question is instead, and more simply: Is that the right and fair reading of the statute”
The brief's quote matches 80% of the cited opinion, but in separate passages — not as one continuous quote. This typically means the brief either paraphrased inside the quotation marks (Bluebook Rule 5.2 requires brackets for any substitution) or silently omitted intervening text (Bluebook Rule 5.3 requires “. . .” for omissions). Compare the brief's quotation against the cited opinion.
What diverges
brief: …s that the right and fair reading of the statute…
opinion: …s that the right and fair read ing of the statute before us? and th…
38 UAW v. Johnson Controls, Inc., 499 U.S. 187 (1991) flagged
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
1 of 2 located
Why we flagged this
- At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement v. Johnson Controls, Inc”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“on the basis of disability”
Not found in the cited opinion. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.
“[A]n explicit gender-based policy is sex discrimination under”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
39 United States v. Georgia, 546 U.S. 151 (2006) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “United States v. Georgia”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“services, programs, or activities”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
40 United States v. Shkambi, 993 F.3d 388 (5th Cir. 2021) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “United States v. Shkambi”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
41 US Airways, Inc. v. Barnett, 535 U.S. 391 (2002) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 4 of 4 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “US Airways, Inc. v. Barnett”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“achieve [its] basic equal opportunity goal.”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
“demand action beyond the realm of the reasonable.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“preferentially.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“the realm of the reasonable.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
42 Whitman v. American Trucking Associations, 531 U.S. 457 (2001) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“Congress … does not, one might say, hide elephants in mouseholes.”
Found — the brief joined separate passages with ellipses (Bluebook R. 5.3).
43 83 F.4th 1333 brief quality flagged
Case exists as cited?
Not verified
Opinion text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
Brief-quality observations
- Case name in the brief differs materially from the official record.
44 2021 WL 6333059 flagged
Case exists as cited?
Not verified
Opinion text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
Why we flagged this
- No matching case-law record found via CourtListener (citation lookup, docket lookup, name search), court-specific adapters, govinfo, or web search. The citation triple did not appear in any of our case-law databases.
45 Pub. L. No. 101-336 retrieval gap
Citation exists?
Pass
· medium confidence
Source text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· source text unavailable
How we matched this
Resolved as a non-case authority (statute, rule, or regulation).
View text on GovInfo →
Quotes attributed to this authority
These quotes have not been verified because the source text wasn't retrieved. Use the link above to open the source and compare directly.
on the basis of disability.
Not verified: source text unavailable.
46 104 Stat. 331 manual verify
Citation exists?
Not verified
Source text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· source text unavailable
Please verify this one manually
This citation falls outside our automated coverage. Law reviews, treatises, restatements, and legislative packages predating govinfo's collection window don't have a free full-text source we can reliably retrieve. The citation itself looks well-formed; a reviewer with access to HeinOnline, Westlaw, Lexis, or a law library can confirm. This isn't a defect in the citation; it's a coverage gap in our automated sources.
Quotes attributed to this authority
These quotes have not been verified because the source text wasn't retrieved.
on the basis of disability
Not verified: source text unavailable.
qualified individual,
Not verified: source text unavailable.
47 18 U.S.C. § 3582 flagged
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
2 of 3 located
Why we flagged this
- At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“modify a term of imprisonment”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“reduction is consistent with applicable policy statements issued by the Sentencing Commission.”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“outlier”
Not found in the cited source text. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.
48 28 U.S.C. § 1254 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
49 42 U.S.C. § 2000e clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
50 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
Pass· 3 of 3 located
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“any person alleging discrimination”
This quote does not appear in the cited opinion's text, but may be a canonical restatement of the opinion — the language appears in another opinion this brief cites.
“any person[s]”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“claiming to be aggrieved”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
51 42 U.S.C. § 12101 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
Pass· 12 of 12 located
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“historically, society has tended to isolate and segregate individuals with disabilities,”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“despite some improvements,”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“continue[d]to be a serious and pervasive social problem.”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
“persist[ed] in such critical areas as employment,”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
“access to public services,”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“public accommodations,”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“a clear and comprehensive national mandate for the elimination of discrimination against individuals with disabilities”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“clear, strong, consistent, enforceable standards addressing discrimination.”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“comprehensive national mandate for the elimination of discrimination against individuals with disabilities.”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“eliminat[e]”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“persist[ence]”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“benefits,”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
52 42 U.S.C. § 12111 flagged
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
21 of 23 located
Why we flagged this
- At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“job restructuring,”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“modified work schedules,”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“readily accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities,”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“other similar accommodations.”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“qualified individuals.”
Not found in the cited source text. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.
“qualified individual”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“an individual who, with or without reasonable accommodation, can perform the essential functions of the employment position that such individual holds or desires.”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“qualified individual”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“employer's judgment as to what functions of a job are essential,”
Found — minor punctuation or spacing differences.
“perform[ance of] the essential functions”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“employment position,”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“qualified individuals”
Not found in the cited source text. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.
“can perform the essential functions of the employment position that”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“hold[] or desire[].”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
“can perform the essential functions of the employment position that such individual holds or desires.”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“qualified individual”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“with or without”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“can perform the essential functions of the employment position.”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“qualified individual”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“qualified individual”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“an individual who, with or without reasonable accommodation, can perform the essential functions of the employment position that such individual holds or desires.”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“the essential functions of the employment position that such individual holds or desires.”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“qualified individual”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
53 42 U.S.C. § 12113 flagged
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
2 of 3 located
Why we flagged this
- At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“undue hardship”
Not found in the cited source text. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.
“business necessity”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“standards, tests, or selection criteria,”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
54 42 U.S.C. § 12117 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
Pass· 3 of 3 located
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“any person alleging discrimination on the basis of disability in violation of [the Act].”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“powers, remedies, and procedures”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“any person alleging discrimination on the basis of disability in violation of”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
55 42 U.S.C. § 12131 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
Pass· 2 of 2 located
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“qualified individual”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“essential eligibility requirements”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
56 42 U.S.C. § 12132 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
Pass· 2 of 2 located
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“services, programs, or activities.”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“[N]o qualified individual with a disability shall, by reason of such disability, be excluded from participation in or be denied the benefits of the services, programs, or activities of a public entity, or be subjected to discrimination by any such entity.”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
57 42 U.S.C. § 12201 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
Pass· 2 of 2 located
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“based on underwriting risks, classifying risks, [and] administering such risks,”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
“benefit[s]plans,”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
58 42 U.S.C. § 4601 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“with respect to public utilities, facilities, services, and the displaced person's place of employment.”
Found — minor punctuation or spacing differences.
59 42 U.S.C. § 4623 flagged
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
1 of 2 located
Why we flagged this
- At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“accessible property,”
Not found in the cited source text. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.
“cost of a comparable replacement dwelling”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
60 51 U.S.C. § 30902 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
Pass· 3 of 3 located
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“amateur astronomer”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“discovered the intrinsically brightest near-Earth asteroid”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“amateur astronomer means an individual whose employer does not provide any funding, payment, or compensation to the individual for the observation of asteroids and other celestial bodies.”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
61 Ind. Code Ann. § 5-10-15-5 manual verify
Citation exists?
Not verified
Source text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
Please verify this one manually
This citation falls outside our automated coverage. Law reviews, treatises, restatements, and legislative packages predating govinfo's collection window don't have a free full-text source we can reliably retrieve. The citation itself looks well-formed; a reviewer with access to HeinOnline, Westlaw, Lexis, or a law library can confirm. This isn't a defect in the citation; it's a coverage gap in our automated sources.
62 N.Y. Gen. Mun. Law § 207 manual verify
Citation exists?
Not verified
Source text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
Please verify this one manually
This citation falls outside our automated coverage. Law reviews, treatises, restatements, and legislative packages predating govinfo's collection window don't have a free full-text source we can reliably retrieve. The citation itself looks well-formed; a reviewer with access to HeinOnline, Westlaw, Lexis, or a law library can confirm. This isn't a defect in the citation; it's a coverage gap in our automated sources.
63 49 C.F.R. § 1540.107 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
Pass· 2 of 2 located
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“[n]o individual may … board an aircraft without submitting to the screening and inspection of”
Found — the brief joined separate passages with ellipses (Bluebook R. 5.3).
“accessible property[.]”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
64 29 Cardozo L. Rev. 1877 manual verify
Citation exists?
Not verified
Source text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· source text unavailable
Please verify this one manually
This citation falls outside our automated coverage. Law reviews, treatises, restatements, and legislative packages predating govinfo's collection window don't have a free full-text source we can reliably retrieve. The citation itself looks well-formed; a reviewer with access to HeinOnline, Westlaw, Lexis, or a law library can confirm. This isn't a defect in the citation; it's a coverage gap in our automated sources.
Quotes attributed to this authority
These quotes have not been verified because the source text wasn't retrieved.
If you have a proposition P, either P is true, or P is false; that is, either P is true or non-P is true. We cannot have a third possibility. As a consequence of the excluded middle, we have the principle of double negation: Negation of negation is equivalent to affirmation.
Not verified: source text unavailable.
65 64 Emory L.J. 1293 manual verify
Citation exists?
Not verified
Source text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· source text unavailable
Please verify this one manually
This citation falls outside our automated coverage. Law reviews, treatises, restatements, and legislative packages predating govinfo's collection window don't have a free full-text source we can reliably retrieve. The citation itself looks well-formed; a reviewer with access to HeinOnline, Westlaw, Lexis, or a law library can confirm. This isn't a defect in the citation; it's a coverage gap in our automated sources.
Quotes attributed to this authority
These quotes have not been verified because the source text wasn't retrieved.
courts can … find implied conditionality as a function of a statute's syntax
Not verified: source text unavailable.
the nature of written language.
Not verified: source text unavailable.
66 42 U.S.C. § 2111 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
Pass· 2 of 2 located
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“qualified individual means an individual who, with or without reasonable accommodation, can perform the essential functions of the employment position that such individual holds or desires.”
This quote does not appear in the cited opinion's text, but may be a canonical restatement of the opinion — the language appears in another opinion this brief cites.
“against a qualified individual on the basis of disability.”
This quote does not appear in the cited opinion's text, but may be a canonical restatement of the opinion — the language appears in another opinion this brief cites.
67 42 U.S.C. § 12112 flagged
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
34 of 37 located
Why we flagged this
- At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“general rule”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“[N]o covered entity shall discriminate against a qualified individual on the basis of disability in regard to job application procedures, the hiring, advancement, or discharge of employees, employee compensation, job training, and other terms, conditions, and privileges of employment.”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“general rule”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“[c]onstruction”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“standards, criteria, or methods of administration that have the effect of discrimination on the basis of disability,”
The brief's quote matches 100% of the cited source text, but in separate passages — not as one continuous quote. This typically means the brief either paraphrased inside the quotation marks (Bluebook Rule 5.2 requires brackets for any substitution) or silently omitted intervening text (Bluebook Rule 5.3 requires “. . .” for omissions). Compare the brief's quotation against the cited source text.
What diverges
brief: …, or methods of administration that have the effect of discr…
opinion: …, or methods of administration-(a) that have the effect of discr…
“tend to screen out … a class of individuals with disabilities,”
Found — the brief joined separate passages with ellipses (Bluebook R. 5.3).
“reasonable accommodation.”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“qualified individuals.”
Not found in the cited source text. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.
“employee compensation … and other terms, conditions, and privileges of employment.”
Found — the brief joined separate passages with ellipses (Bluebook R. 5.3).
“qualified individual with a disability who is an applicant or employee.”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“discriminat[ing] against a qualified individual on the basis of disability in regard to … employee compensation … and other terms, conditions, and privileges of employment.”
Found in the source text.
“organization providing fringe benefits”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“has the effect”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“discriminate[s] … on the basis of disability.”
Found — the brief joined separate passages with ellipses (Bluebook R. 5.3).
“compensation,”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“in regard to … compensation,”
Found — the brief joined separate passages with ellipses (Bluebook R. 5.3).
“against a qualified individual.”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“on the basis of disability in regard to … employee compensation”
Found — the brief joined separate passages with ellipses (Bluebook R. 5.3).
“with a disability.”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“discriminat[ion]”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“job application procedures, the hiring, advancement, or discharge of employees, employee compensation, job training, and other terms, conditions, and privileges of employment.”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“requir[ing] affirmative conduct”
Not found in the cited source text. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.
“includes … not making reasonable accommodations to the known physical or mental limitations of an otherwise qualified individual with a disability who is an applicant or employee.”
Found — the brief joined separate passages with ellipses (Bluebook R. 5.3).
“can demonstrate that the accommodation would impose an undue hardship”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“operation.”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“[Q]ualification standards”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“is shown to be jobrelated for the position in question and is consistent with business necessity.”
Found — minor punctuation or spacing differences.
“tests concerning employment”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“inquiries into the ability of an applicant to perform jobrelated functions”
Found — minor punctuation or spacing differences.
“includes … not making reasonable accommodations to the known physical or mental limitations of an otherwise qualified individual with a disability who is an applicant or employee.”
Found — the brief joined separate passages with ellipses (Bluebook R. 5.3).
“qualified individual[s]with a disability.”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
“with a disability,”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“qualified individual,”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“qualified individual”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“with a disability”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“qualified individual … who is an applicant or employee.”
Found — the brief joined separate passages with ellipses (Bluebook R. 5.3).
“compensation,”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
68 Pub. L. No. 111-2, § 3, 123 Stat. 5 (2009) flagged
Citation exists?
Pass
· medium confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
0 of 2 located
Why we flagged this
- At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.
Quotes attributed to this authority
“discriminatory compensation decision or other practice is adopted,”
Not found in the cited source text. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.
“when an individual is affected by application of a discriminatory compensation decision or other practice, including each time wages, benefits, or other compensation is paid.”
Not found in the cited source text. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.
69 Ind. Code Ann. § 5-10-15-5.5 manual verify
Citation exists?
Not verified
Source text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
Please verify this one manually
This citation falls outside our automated coverage. Law reviews, treatises, restatements, and legislative packages predating govinfo's collection window don't have a free full-text source we can reliably retrieve. The citation itself looks well-formed; a reviewer with access to HeinOnline, Westlaw, Lexis, or a law library can confirm. This isn't a defect in the citation; it's a coverage gap in our automated sources.
72 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(e)(3)(A) clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
Pass· 6 of 6 located
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“becomes subject to”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“is affected by”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“becomes subject to”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“is affected by application of”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“discriminatory compensation decision”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“adopted,”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
73 42 U.S.C. § 12117(a) clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
74 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(1) clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
75 135 Cong. Rec. S10712 (daily ed. Sept. 7, 1989) manual verify
Citation exists?
Not verified
Source text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· source text unavailable
Please verify this one manually
This citation falls outside our automated coverage. Law reviews, treatises, restatements, and legislative packages predating govinfo's collection window don't have a free full-text source we can reliably retrieve. The citation itself looks well-formed; a reviewer with access to HeinOnline, Westlaw, Lexis, or a law library can confirm. This isn't a defect in the citation; it's a coverage gap in our automated sources.
Quotes attributed to this authority
These quotes have not been verified because the source text wasn't retrieved.
live [their] retirement years in dignity
Not verified: source text unavailable.
76 H.R. Rep. No. 101-485, pt. 2 (1990) manual verify
Citation exists?
Not verified
Source text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
Please verify this one manually
This citation falls outside our automated coverage. Law reviews, treatises, restatements, and legislative packages predating govinfo's collection window don't have a free full-text source we can reliably retrieve. The citation itself looks well-formed; a reviewer with access to HeinOnline, Westlaw, Lexis, or a law library can confirm. This isn't a defect in the citation; it's a coverage gap in our automated sources.
77 H.R. Rep. No. 101-485, pt. 3 (1990) manual verify
Citation exists?
Not verified
Source text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
Please verify this one manually
This citation falls outside our automated coverage. Law reviews, treatises, restatements, and legislative packages predating govinfo's collection window don't have a free full-text source we can reliably retrieve. The citation itself looks well-formed; a reviewer with access to HeinOnline, Westlaw, Lexis, or a law library can confirm. This isn't a defect in the citation; it's a coverage gap in our automated sources.
78 H.R. Rep. No. 101-485, pt. 3, at 48 (1990) manual verify
Citation exists?
Not verified
Source text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· source text unavailable
Please verify this one manually
This citation falls outside our automated coverage. Law reviews, treatises, restatements, and legislative packages predating govinfo's collection window don't have a free full-text source we can reliably retrieve. The citation itself looks well-formed; a reviewer with access to HeinOnline, Westlaw, Lexis, or a law library can confirm. This isn't a defect in the citation; it's a coverage gap in our automated sources.
Quotes attributed to this authority
These quotes have not been verified because the source text wasn't retrieved.
powers, remedies, and procedures
Not verified: source text unavailable.
civil rights protections for persons with disabilities that are parallel to
Not verified: source text unavailable.
79 H.R. Rep. No. 101-485, pt. 2, at 55 (1990) manual verify
Citation exists?
Not verified
Source text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· source text unavailable
Please verify this one manually
This citation falls outside our automated coverage. Law reviews, treatises, restatements, and legislative packages predating govinfo's collection window don't have a free full-text source we can reliably retrieve. The citation itself looks well-formed; a reviewer with access to HeinOnline, Westlaw, Lexis, or a law library can confirm. This isn't a defect in the citation; it's a coverage gap in our automated sources.
Quotes attributed to this authority
These quotes have not been verified because the source text wasn't retrieved.
does not undermine an employer's ability to choose and maintain qualified workers.
Not verified: source text unavailable.
80 H.R. Rep. No. 101-485, at 56 manual verify
Citation exists?
Not verified
Source text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· source text unavailable
Please verify this one manually
This citation falls outside our automated coverage. Law reviews, treatises, restatements, and legislative packages predating govinfo's collection window don't have a free full-text source we can reliably retrieve. The citation itself looks well-formed; a reviewer with access to HeinOnline, Westlaw, Lexis, or a law library can confirm. This isn't a defect in the citation; it's a coverage gap in our automated sources.
Quotes attributed to this authority
These quotes have not been verified because the source text wasn't retrieved.
lift[ing] fifty pounds
Not verified: source text unavailable.
§Record & filing references (43)
Citations to filings in this case or its record — appendices, docket entries, pleadings. These aren't published authority, so we don't retrieve or verify them. They're listed here so every citation in the brief is accounted for.
Pet. App. 11a
appendix
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- must desire or already have a job with the defendant at the time the defendant commits the discriminatory act.
- qualified individual
- present tense
- [c]an,
- holds,
- desires.
Pet. App. 16a
appendix
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- retiree, not [an] employee,
- qualified individual.
- concede[d]
- agree[d]
App. 1
appendix
not verified
App. 20
appendix
not verified
Pet. App. 2a
appendix
not verified
Doc. 1 at 3
docket filing
not verified
Pet. App. 3a
appendix
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- health insurance subsidy.
Doc. 1 at 5
docket filing
not verified
Doc. 38-15 at 11
docket filing
not verified
Doc. 38-6 at 2
docket filing
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- retire[d]with twentyfive (25) years of service
- retire[d]for disability reasons.
- retire[d]with twenty-five (25) years of service
Pet. App. 21a
appendix
not verified
https://perma.cc/F8CP-UJL8
web source
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- highest rates of injuries and illnesses of all occupations.
https://perma.cc/PLP6-7GHL
web source
not verified
Doc. 1 at 12
docket filing
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- disabled
- normal
- disabled
- normal
- normal
- disabled
Pet. App. 22a
appendix
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- all employees retiring as a result of full disability
Doc. 38-11 at 4
docket filing
not verified
Doc. 39-16 at 13
docket filing
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- normal retirees
Doc. 38 at 7
docket filing
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- cost cutting measure[].
Doc. 39-4 at 10
docket filing
not verified
Doc. 39-16 at 5
docket filing
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- data, mathematical calculations, [or] correspondence … upon which [it] based its decision
- normal retirees.
Doc. 39-9 at 46
docket filing
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- financial estimates
- the cost of continuing the disability retirees['] [subsidy] longer than 24 months
Doc. 38-4 at 3
docket filing
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- stiffness [and] rigidity … as well as [a]loss of dexterity in her extremities.
Doc. 38-15 at 9
docket filing
not verified
Doc 39-9 at 23
docket filing
not verified
Doc. 1 at 6-7
docket filing
not verified
Doc. 39-9 at 25
docket filing
not verified
Doc. 39-16 at 3-4
docket filing
not verified
Doc. 39-4 at 69
docket filing
not verified
Pet. App. 24a
appendix
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- disabled former employee
- no standing to sue
Pet. App. 11a-12a
appendix
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- qualified individual
Pet. App. 16a-17a
appendix
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- qualified individual
Pet. App. 18a
appendix
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- conceded that … she was [not] impacted
Doc. 39-16 at 27-28
docket filing
not verified
App. 16
appendix
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- concedes, and we agree, that her claim cannot turn on the 2003 amendment to the benefits plan because she was not yet disabled at that time.
- was not yet disabled at that time,
Doc. 1 at 4
docket filing
not verified
Reply Br. at 6
party filing
not verified
App. 18
appendix
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- affirmatively conceded
- impacted by [the City's policy] during her employment.
App. 11
appendix
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- qualified individual.
- qualified individuals
- qualified individual
- can perform
- holds
- desires
- Qualified individual means an individual who (a) holds or desires an employment position and (b) can perform the essential functions of that employment position.
- [Q]ualified individual means an individual who … can perform the essential functions of the employment position that such individual holds or desires.
App. 7
appendix
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- qualified individual
- expressly applie[s]only to 'qualified individuals with a disability' who 'hold[]' or 'desire[]' an 'employment position.'
https://perma.cc/2BVB-2K4P
web source
not verified
Footnote 2
footnote
not verified
Footnote 3
footnote
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- [c]onditions can be conveyed without any overt conditional subordinator
- conditions can be expressed
- the omission of conjunctions such as if
- When a command is conditional, its condition may be either overt or explicit on the one hand ('When it rains, close the windows!!') or tacit or implicit on the other ('Drive carefully!' [means] 'When you drive, drive carefully!!').
- [W]hile conditional sentences in English are often associated with the canonical form 'if p, q,' we also know that neither the use of 'if' nor a two-clause structure is essential for expressing a conditional thought.
Footnote 4
footnote
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- law of the excluded middle,