Report
triumph-foods-v-bonta
63 authorities checked
How this report was built
AI inference calls
0
Citations parsed
63
Sources queried
5
Cornell LII, CourtListener, Federal court adapters, State code databases, govinfo
Source texts retrieved
54
Quotes checked
67
55 matched in source text
Verification runs deterministically against authoritative public databases. Your brief is not sent to OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or any other third-party model.
Click any citation below to see how we verified it, the matched source, and a per-quote breakdown.
§Authorities
|
1 Ass'n des Éleveurs de Canards et d'Oies du Quebec v. Bonta, 33 F.4th 1107 (9th Cir. 2022) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Association Des Eleveurs v. Rob Bonta”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
2 Augustine v. United States, 704 F.2d 1074 clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Richard Augustine v. United States”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
3 Bacchus Imports, Ltd. v. Dias, 468 U.S. 263 (1984) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Bacchus Imports, Ltd. v. Dias”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“had both the purpose and effect of discriminating in favor of local products”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
4 Bassett v. ABM Parking Servs., Inc., 883 F.3d 776 (9th Cir. 2018) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Steven Bassett v. Abm Parking Services”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
5 Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
6 Berg v. Popham, 412 U.S. 1122 (9th Cir. 2005) brief quality flagged
Case exists as cited?
Not verified
Opinion text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
Brief-quality observations
- A case named 'Berg v. Popham' exists in CourtListener at 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 12412, 2005 WL 1490472, 35 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20136, 412 F.3d 1122, 60 ERC (BNA) 1838 (ca9, 2005). The brief cites it as 412 U.S. 1122 — the brief's citation does not match the real instrument.
7 Bullfrog Films, Inc. v. Wick, 847 F.2d 502 (9th Cir. 1988) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Bullfrog Films, Inc. v. Charles Z. Wick, Director, United States Information Agency”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“put [plaintiff's] films at a competitive disadvantage in the international marketplace”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
8 Cafasso, U.S. ex rel. v. Gen. Dynamics C4 Sys., Inc., 637 F.3d 1047 (9th Cir. 2011) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
9 Camps Newfound/Owatonna, Inc. v. Town of Harrison, 520 U.S. 564 (1997) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Camps Newfound/Owatonna, Inc. v. Town of Harrison”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
10 Casumpang v. Int'l Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union, 269 F.3d 1042 (9th Cir. 2001) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Nicanor E. Casumpang, Jr. v. International Longshoremen's And Warehousemen's Union, Local 142”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“should prevail [on a motion to dismiss] only if the material jurisdictional facts are not in dispute and the moving party is entitled to prevail as a matter of law.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
11 Cavel Int'l, Inc. v. Madigan, 500 F.3d 551 (7th Cir. 2007) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Cavel International, Inc. v. Madigan”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
12 Comptroller of Treasury of Md. v. Wynne, 575 U.S. 542 (2015) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Comptroller of Treasury of Md. v. Wynne”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
13 Empacadora de Carnes de Fresnillo, S.A. de C.V. v. Curry, 476 F.3d 326 (5th Cir. 2007) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Empacadora De Carnes De Fresnillo, S.A. De C v. v. Curry”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
14 Engine Mfrs. Ass'n v. S. Coast Air Quality Mgmt. Dist., 541 U.S. 246 (2004) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Engine Manufacturers Ass'n v. South Coast Air Quality Management District”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“[I]f one State or political subdivision may enact such rules, then so may any other; and the end result would undo Congress's carefully calibrated regulatory scheme.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
15 Fleming v. Pickard, 581 F.3d 922 (9th Cir. 2009) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Fleming v. Pickard”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
16 Gen. Motors Corp. v. Tracy, 519 U.S. 278 (1997) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “General Motors Corp. v. Tracy”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“cognizable injury from unconstitutional discrimination against interstate commerce does not stop at [whomever] a State ultimately discriminates[.]”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
17 Granholm v. Heald, 544 U.S. 460 (2005) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Granholm v. Heald”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
18 Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advert. Comm'n, 432 U.S. 333 (1977) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 2 of 2 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“rais[ed] the costs of doing business in the North Carolina market for Washington apple growers and dealers, while leaving those of their North Carolina counterparts unaffected”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
“statute [with] a leveling effect which insidiously operates to the advantage of local apple producers”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
19 Iowa Pork Producers Ass'n v. Bonta, No. 2:21-CV-09940-CAS (AFMX), 2022 WL 61373 6 (C.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2022) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
We couldn't independently confirm the reporter triple, but we believe this is the matching case based on CourtListener's docket index. Matched docket: “Iowa Pork Producers Association v. Rob Bonta”.
View matched docket on CourtListener →
20 19-20, Iowa Pork Producers Ass'n v. Bonta, No. 2:21-CV-09940-CAS (AFMX), 2022 WL 613736 (C.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2022) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
We couldn't independently confirm the reporter triple, but we believe this is the matching case based on CourtListener's docket index. Matched docket: “Iowa Pork Producers Association v. Rob Bonta”.
View matched docket on CourtListener →
21 J.G. v. City of Colton, No. 5:18-CV-02386-RGK-SP, 2019 WL 4233582 (C.D. Cal. July 1, 2019) pacer paywall only
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· opinion text unavailable
How we matched this
We couldn't independently confirm the reporter triple, but we believe this is the matching case based on CourtListener's docket index.
Why we couldn't check the quotes
We couldn't retrieve any opinion text for this citation from our public sources. The case may only be available on a paid service like Westlaw or Lexis. Without the text, we can't check whether the brief's quotes appear in the opinion.
View matched docket on CourtListener →Quotes attributed to this authority
These quotes have not been verified because the opinion text wasn't available. Use the docket link above to locate the cited ruling and compare directly.
[A] Rule 12(c) motion is properly brought after an answer has been filed
Not verified: opinion text unavailable.
22 Jama v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 113 F.4th 924 (9th Cir. 2024) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Faysal Jama v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
23 Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555 (1992) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“invasion of a legally protected interest [that] is (a) concrete and particularized and (b) actual or imminent, not conjectural or hypothetical.”
Found — the brief signaled the modification with a Bluebook parenthetical, so we used a relaxed match. Brief signaled: “(citation omitted)”.
24 Nat'l Pork Producers Council v. Ross, 598 U.S. 356 (2023) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “National Pork Producers Council v. Ross”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“a further, negative command, one effectively forbidding the enforcement of certain state economic regulations even when Congress has failed to legislate on the subject.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion. Brief signaled: “(citation modified)”.
25 National Meat Ass'n v. Harris, 565 U.S. 452 (2012) flagged
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
20 of 21 located
Why we flagged this
- At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “National Meat Assn. v. Harris”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“prior to delivery, away from the slaughterhouse itself”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“not involve a slaughterhouse's 'premises, facilities, and operations.'”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“[o]nce meat from a slaughtered pig has passed a post-mortem inspection, the [FMIA] 'is not concerned with whether or how it is ever actually sold'”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
“avoids the scope of the [FMIA], by altogether removing nonambulatory pigs from the slaughtering process”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
“designed to ensure the humane treatment of pigs.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“[t]he idea-and the inevitable effect-of the [sales ban] is to make sure that slaughterhouses remove nonambulatory pigs from the production process (or keep them out of the process from the beginning) by criminalizing the sale of their meat.”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
“functions as a command to slaughterhouses to structure their operations in the exact way the [state law] mandates”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
“regulates how slaughterhouses must deal with nonambulatory pigs on their premises.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“any State and Animal Legal Defense Fund were Respondents in Harris, also represented by the same counsel here. Id. [to] impose any regulation on slaughterhouses just by framing it as a ban on the sale of meat produced in whatever way the State disapproved.”
The brief's quote matches 54% of the cited opinion, but in separate passages — not as one continuous quote. This typically means the brief either paraphrased inside the quotation marks (Bluebook Rule 5.2 requires brackets for any substitution) or silently omitted intervening text (Bluebook Rule 5.3 requires “. . .” for omissions). Compare the brief's quotation against the cited opinion.
What diverges
brief: …any state and animal legal defense fund were respondents in harris, also represented by the same counsel here. id. impose any regulation on slau…
opinion: …er of §599f mandates. and indeed, if the sales ban were to avoid the fmias preemption clause, then any state could impose any regulation on slau…
“states are free to decide which animals may be turned into meat”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“one vital function of the [FMIA] and its regulations is to ensure that some kinds of livestock delivered to a slaughterhouse's gates will not be turned into meat”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
“[u]nder federal law, nonambulatory pigs are not among those excluded animals,”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“to say only that [the state law] requirements differ from those of the FMIA-not that [the state law] requirements fall outside the FMIA's scope.”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
“nonambulatory pigs”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“When such a ban is in effect, no horses will be delivered to, inspected at, or handled by a slaughterhouse, because no horses will be ordered for purchase in the first instance.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“sweeps widely”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“prevents a State from imposing any additional or different-even if non-conflicting-requirements that fall within the scope of the [FMIA] and concern a slaughterhouse's facilities or operations.”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
“functions as a command to slaughterhouses to structure their operations in the exact way the [state law] mandates”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
“usually foreclose state regulation of the commercial sales activities of slaughterhouses.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“if the sales ban were to avoid the FMIA's preemption clause, then any State could impose any regulation on slaughterhouses just by framing it as a ban on the sale of meat produced in whatever way the State disapproved. That would make a mockery of the FMIA's preemption provision.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
“if the sales ban were to avoid the FMIA's preemption clause, then any State could impose any regulation on slaughterhouses just by framing it as a ban on the sale of meat produced in whatever way the State disapproved. That would make a mockery of the FMIA's preemption provision.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
26 S. Dakota v. Wayfair, 585 U.S. 162 (2018) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“face a virtually per se rule of invalidity.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion. Brief signaled: “(citation modified)”.
27 Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, 578 U.S. 330 (2016) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 3 of 3 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“actually exist[s],”
Found word-for-word in the opinion. Brief signaled: “(citation omitted)”.
“[i]ntangible harms and a 'risk of real harm' can be sufficiently concrete”
This quote does not appear in the cited opinion's text, but may be a canonical restatement of the opinion — the language appears in another opinion this brief cites.
“affect[s]the plaintiff in a personal and individual way.”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
28 Stiles v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., No. 214CV02234MCECMK, 2017 WL 3783091 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2017) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
Matched on GovInfo, the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
View opinion on GovInfo →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“because Defendants have not filed an Answer, their motion brought under Rule 12(c) is improper.”
Found word-for-word in the opinion.
29 Stiles v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., No. 214CV02234MCECMK, 2017 WL 3783091 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2017), on reconsideration, No. 214CV02234MCECMK, 2018 WL 3093501 (E.D. Cal. June 20, 2018) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
Matched on GovInfo, the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
View opinion on GovInfo →
30 Tennessee Wine & Spirits Retailers Ass'n v. Thomas, 588 U.S. 504 (2019) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Tennessee Wine and Spirits Retailers Assn. v. Thomas”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
31 Triumph Foods, LLC v. Campbell, 715 F. Supp. 3d 143 (D. Mass. 2024) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The brief's reporter triple is independently confirmed by leagle.com's volume index, and CourtListener's docket index identifies the same case. Matched docket: “Triumph Foods, LLC v. Campbell”.
View matched docket on CourtListener →
View case page on GovInfo →
32 Tyler v. Hennepin Cnty., Minnesota, 598 U.S. 631 (2023) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· high confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
The citation's reporter triple appears in CourtListener's index, matched to “Tyler v. Hennepin County”.
View matched opinion on CourtListener →
33 United States ex rel. Relator LLC v. Riviera Fin. LLC, No. 2:22-CV-04783-RGK-PD, 2025 WL 1421265 (C.D. Cal. Feb. 6, 2025) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
We couldn't independently confirm the reporter triple, but we believe this is the matching case based on CourtListener's docket index.
View matched docket on CourtListener →
34 Triumph Foods, LLC v. Campbell, 156 F.4th 29 (1st Cir. 2025) clean
Case exists as cited?
Pass
· medium confidence
Opinion text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in opinion?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
The brief's reporter triple is independently confirmed by leagle.com's volume index, and CourtListener's docket index identifies the same case.
View matched docket on CourtListener →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“only way Triumph would be able to take advantage of the slaughterhouse exception would be to open its own federally inspected facility within the [state], which the Supreme Court has held violates the Commerce Clause.”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
35 21 U.S.C. § 601 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
36 21 U.S.C. § 602 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
Pass· 2 of 2 located
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“effective regulation of meat and meat food products in interstate [] commerce,”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
“protect the health and welfare of consumers.”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
37 21 U.S.C. § 603 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
38 21 U.S.C. § 604 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
39 21 U.S.C. § 607 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
Pass· 2 of 2 located
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“Inspected and Passed.”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“Inspected and Passed.”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
40 21 U.S.C. § 678 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
Pass· 3 of 3 located
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“requirements within the scope of this chapter with respect to premises, facilities and operations of any establishment at which inspection is provided under subchapter I of this chapter, which are in addition to, or different than those made under this chapter[.]”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“[r]equirements within the scope of [the FMIA] with respect to premises, facilities and operations of any [FMIA-inspected] establishment . . . which are in addition to, or different than those made under this chapter[.]”
Found in the source text.
“impose recordkeeping and other requirements,”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
41 21 U.S.C. §§ 672-673 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
42 Cal. Health & Safety Code § 25990 flagged
Citation exists?
Pass
· medium confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
2 of 4 located
Why we flagged this
- At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.
How we matched this
Matched on the state code's official online publication.
View text on state code →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“[l]ying down, standing up, and fully extending [their] limbs,”
Not found in the cited source text. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.
“[t]urning around freely.”
Not found in the cited source text. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.
“knowingly engag[ing] in the sale within the state”
Found, treating [bracketed] text in the quote as flexible.
“knows or should know is the meat of a covered animal who was confined in a cruel manner, or is the meat of the immediate offspring of a covered animal that was confined in a cruel manner.”
This quote does not appear in the cited opinion's text, but may be a canonical restatement of the opinion — the language appears in another opinion this brief cites.
43 Cal. Health & Safety Code § 25990-25994 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· medium confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
Matched on the state code's official online publication.
View text on state code →
44 Cal. Health & Safety Code § 25991 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· medium confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
Pass· 6 of 6 located
How we matched this
Matched on the state code's official online publication.
View text on state code →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“Confined in a cruel manner”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“[c]onfining a covered animal in a manner that prevents the animal from lying down, standing up, fully extending the animal's limbs, or turning around freely,”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“confining a breeding pig with less than 24 square feet of usable floorspace per pig,”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“undertaken at an establishment at which mandatory inspection is provided under the Federal Meat Inspection Act . . ..”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“a commercial sale by a business that sells any item covered by this chapter, but does not include any sale undertaken at an establishment at which mandatory inspection is provided under the Federal Meat Inspection Act[.]”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
“a sale shall be deemed to occur at the location where the buyer takes physical possession[.]”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
45 Cal. Health & Safety Code § 2599l clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· medium confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
Matched on the state code's official online publication.
View text on state code →
46 Cal. Health & Safety Code §§ 25990-25993 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· medium confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
Matched on the state code's official online publication.
View text on state code →
47 9 C.F.R. § 309.1 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
48 Cal. Code Regs. tit. 3, §§ 1322-1327.3 manual verify
Citation exists?
Not verified
Source text retrieved?
Link only
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
Please verify this one manually
We've identified the source URL for this citation, but the host blocks automated tools so we couldn't pull the text to verify the quotes ourselves. The link below opens fine in a browser; click through to manually confirm the section text matches the brief.
View text on state code →49 Cal. Code Regs. tit. 3 § 1322.7 manual verify
Citation exists?
Not verified
Source text retrieved?
Link only
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· source text unavailable
Please verify this one manually
We've identified the source URL for this citation, but the host blocks automated tools so we couldn't pull the text to verify the quotes ourselves. The link below opens fine in a browser; click through to manually confirm the section text matches the brief.
View text on state code →Quotes attributed to this authority
These quotes have not been verified because the source text wasn't retrieved. Use the link above to open the source and compare directly.
reasonable suspicion
Not verified: source text unavailable.
commercial sale,
Not verified: source text unavailable.
to sell, exchange, barter, trade, transfer title or possession, or distribute, conditional or otherwise, in California commerce.
Not verified: source text unavailable.
50 34 Stat. 674 manual verify
Citation exists?
Not verified
Source text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
Please verify this one manually
This citation falls outside our automated coverage. Law reviews, treatises, restatements, and legislative packages predating govinfo's collection window don't have a free full-text source we can reliably retrieve. The citation itself looks well-formed; a reviewer with access to HeinOnline, Westlaw, Lexis, or a law library can confirm. This isn't a defect in the citation; it's a coverage gap in our automated sources.
51 34 Stat. 1260 manual verify
Citation exists?
Not verified
Source text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
Please verify this one manually
This citation falls outside our automated coverage. Law reviews, treatises, restatements, and legislative packages predating govinfo's collection window don't have a free full-text source we can reliably retrieve. The citation itself looks well-formed; a reviewer with access to HeinOnline, Westlaw, Lexis, or a law library can confirm. This isn't a defect in the citation; it's a coverage gap in our automated sources.
52 Cal. Health & Safety Code §§ 25990-25993.1 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· medium confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
Matched on the state code's official online publication.
View text on state code →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“to prevent animal cruelty by phasing out extreme methods of farm animal confinement, which also threaten the health and safety of California consumers, and increase the risk of foodborne illness and associated negative fiscal impacts on the State of California.”
This quote does not appear in the cited opinion's text, but may be a canonical restatement of the opinion — the language appears in another opinion this brief cites.
56 9 C.F.R. § 412.1.2 flagged
Citation exists?
Not verified
Source text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
Why we flagged this
- We couldn't independently verify this citation against our public sources.
57 Rule 12(c) flagged
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
0 of 1 located
Why we flagged this
- At least one attributed quote wasn't located in the retrieved text.
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“after the pleadings are closed-but early enough not to delay the trial.”
Not found in the cited source text. We tried exact matching, bracketed substitutions, ellipsis-split joins, and punctuation-tolerant matching — none matched.
58 Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
Pass· 1 of 1 located
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
Quotes attributed to this authority
“failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.”
Found word-for-word in the source text.
59 Rule 12(b)(1) clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
60 L.R. 11 manual verify
Citation exists?
Not verified
Source text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
Please verify this one manually
This citation falls outside our automated coverage. Law reviews, treatises, restatements, and legislative packages predating govinfo's collection window don't have a free full-text source we can reliably retrieve. The citation itself looks well-formed; a reviewer with access to HeinOnline, Westlaw, Lexis, or a law library can confirm. This isn't a defect in the citation; it's a coverage gap in our automated sources.
61 9 C.F.R. § 301.2 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
62 9 C.F.R. § 317.8 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
63 9 C.F.R. § 325.1 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· no quotes to check
How we matched this
Matched on Cornell Law's online code (LII).
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
64 U.S. Const. art. I, § 8, cl. 3 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
N/A
How we matched this
Constitutional citation.
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
65 Art. I, § 10, cl. 2 clean
Citation exists?
Pass
· high confidence
Source text retrieved?
Yes
Quotes found in source?
N/A
How we matched this
Constitutional citation.
View text on Cornell Law (LII) →
66 H.R. Rep. No. 90-653, pt. 1, at 14 (1967) manual verify
Citation exists?
Not verified
Source text retrieved?
No
Quotes found in source?
N/A
· source text unavailable
Please verify this one manually
This citation falls outside our automated coverage. Law reviews, treatises, restatements, and legislative packages predating govinfo's collection window don't have a free full-text source we can reliably retrieve. The citation itself looks well-formed; a reviewer with access to HeinOnline, Westlaw, Lexis, or a law library can confirm. This isn't a defect in the citation; it's a coverage gap in our automated sources.
Quotes attributed to this authority
These quotes have not been verified because the source text wasn't retrieved.
provide consumer protection for all citizens, regardless of where their meat originates.
Not verified: source text unavailable.
§Record & filing references (32)
Citations to filings in this case or its record — appendices, docket entries, pleadings. These aren't published authority, so we don't retrieve or verify them. They're listed here so every citation in the brief is accounted for.
ECF No. 1 ¶ 244
docket filing
not verified
ECF No. 1 ¶ 116
docket filing
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- pervasive, continuous, and ongoing disruption of operations
- already imposed enormous costs on Triumph[.]
- new inventory management tools (e.g., stock keeping units, or bar codes), new sorting procedures, and new cold storage locations to keep each type of product separate.
- Proposition 12 impacts the operations and facilities of Triumph
- remove[] USDA-inspected Whole Pork Meat from their operations and facilities [and forces Triumph to] convert[] the USDA-approved pork to adulterated pork if destined for California.
- continuously impacts the operations and facilities of Triumph . . . on a daily basis[.]
ECF No. 1 ¶ 147
docket filing
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- the on-site ante and post-mortem provisions of the FMIA, the transportation and distribution provisions of the FMIA, the labeling provisions of the FMIA, and the recall provisions of the FMIA.
ECF No. 1 ¶ 243
docket filing
not verified
ECF No. 1 ¶ 11
docket filing
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- unfair advantage
- express advantages over out-of-state processors like Triumph
ECF No. 49 at 6-7
docket filing
not verified
ECF No. 49 at 9-11
docket filing
not verified
ECF No. 1 ¶ 144
docket filing
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- Prop 12's requirements for pigs on the farms, and the sales ban of the processed pork in California, regulations and interferesthrough both additional and different requirements-with the sweeping scope of FMIA establishments' operations on a daily, continuous basis.
- regulates and interferes with
ECF No. 49 at 11-12
docket filing
not verified
ECF No. 1 ¶ 165
docket filing
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- ensure further commingling of Proposition 12 and USDA approved pork does not happen after the processing occurs on the line itself[.]
ECF No. 1 ¶¶ 144-210
docket filing
not verified
ECF No. 1 ¶¶ 153-58
docket filing
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- adulteration
ECF No. 1 ¶¶ 159-160
docket filing
not verified
ECF No. 1 ¶¶ 161-167
docket filing
not verified
ECF No. 1 ¶ 169
docket filing
not verified
ECF No. 1 ¶¶ 168-172
docket filing
not verified
ECF No. 1 ¶¶ 173-181
docket filing
not verified
ECF No. 1 ¶¶ 182-188
docket filing
not verified
ECF No. 1 ¶¶ 189-195
docket filing
not verified
ECF No. 1 ¶ 4
docket filing
not verified
ECF No. 49 at 14
docket filing
not verified
ECF No. 1 ¶¶ 233-34
docket filing
not verified
ECF No. 1 ¶¶ 238-240
docket filing
not verified
ECF No. 1 ¶ 241
docket filing
not verified
ECF No. 1 ¶ 240
docket filing
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- update and alter their operations, contracts, policies and facilities, and maintain their sales relationships with their California customers.
ECF No. 1 ¶ 242
docket filing
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- loss of customers . . . as the processors tried to find farms will[ing] to make the investment costs to convert
ECF No. 49 at 25-26
docket filing
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- lead time argument
ECF No. 1
docket filing
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- lead in
ECF No. 23 at 19-20
docket filing
not verified
ECF No. 1 ¶ 249
docket filing
not verified
ECF No. 48 at 25-27
docket filing
not verified
Quoted language the brief sources to this reference (not to a cited case):
- engaged in
ECF No. 1 ¶¶ 286-87
docket filing
not verified